★ Independent, reader-supported & ad-free · Watching the watchers in all 50 states ★ Support Us
The Docket · Government Meeting · DKT-2026-001464

On the agenda: Avondale City Council Meeting — Flock Safety (Sep 28)

⚠ Agenda Watch  Avondale, Arizona · Monday, September 28, 2026 — in 6 days

About this record

The published agenda for this September 28 meeting contains: "Flock Safety", "license plate reader", "Flock camera", "ALPR". This is the public record BEFORE the vote — read the document, then show up. Public comment is where cancellations start.

WhenMonday, September 28, 2026
Check the agenda document for the meeting time.
WhereAvondale, Arizona
BodyCity Council Meeting
Money$500, on the table
On the record“Flock Safety”“license plate reader”“Flock camera”“ALPR”“automated license plate”“surveillance camera”

The agenda, word for word

Government public record — the full text of the published document, archived September 22, 2026. Gold highlighting of key terms is ours, not the original’s. Read the original document ↗

30 pages · scroll to read
Page 1 of 30

City of Avondale
City Council Meeting
Monday, September 28, 2026

Mayor and Council
Mike Pineda, Mayor
Curtis Nielson, Vice Mayor
Tina Conde, Councilmember
Gloria Solorio, Councilmember

Jeannette Garcia, Councilmember
Shari Weise, Councilmember

Max White, Councilmember

Administration
Ron Corbin, City Manager
Jennifer Stein, Asst. City Manager
Renee Weatherless, Asst. City Manager

Andy Mesquita, Asst. City Manager
Nicholle Harris, City Attorney

Marcella Sarmiento, City Clerk

City Council Chamber
11465 West Civic Center Drive
Avondale, AZ 85323

Watch a City Council Meeting On YouTube Live
All Regular City Council meetings will be livestreamed on the City of
Avondale YouTube channel. The livestream will begin approximately 30
minutes prior to the meeting start time.
https://www.youtube.com/@cityofavondaleaz
Please note, the livestream will not be monitored by staff; therefore, anyone wishing to
address the City Council shall appear in person to speak.
Helpful • Kind • Professional

Page 2 of 30

City Council Meeting
Notice & Agenda
Monday, September 28, 2026
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER | 11465 WEST CIVIC CENTER DRIVE | AVONDALE AZ, 85323

Request to Speak: Anyone wishing to address the Council regarding items listed on the agenda or under "Unscheduled
Public Appearance" should submit an Online Request to Speak form (http://www.avondaleaz.gov/requesttospeak) at least
one hour prior to the start of the meeting. Paper Request to Speak cards are also available at the meeting and should be
submitted to staff prior to the start of the meeting.

REGULAR MEETING
5:30 PM
Physical Access to the Council Chambers will be available 30 minutes prior to the meeting.

CALL TO ORDER BY MAYOR
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE & MOMENT OF REFLECTION
1.

ROLL CALL BY THE CITY CLERK

2.

PRESENTATION ITEMS
a.

EMPLOYEE ANNOUNCEMENTS
The following employees will be introduced to City Council. This item is for discussion only.
* Indicates a recent promotion
City Clerk's Office
• Veronica Moreno, City Clerk Specialist *
• Yaritzi Sicairos, City Clerk Specialist

Finance & Budget Department
• Fina Johnson, Director *

Economic Development
City Manager's Office
• Jaime Lyn Gonzales, Assistant Director *
• Renee Weatherless, Assistant City Manager *
Human Resources Department
City Court
• Leanne Lunsford, Benefits Analyst
• Vicki Cruz, Administrative Specialist
• Natalie Valdez, Benefits Manager
• Micaela Machuca, Court Clerk Specialist *
• Liana Bell, Assistant Director *
• Dominique Garcia, Court Clerk I
Development Services Department
• Faith Westacott, Building Permit Technician I
b.

PROCLAMATION - FIRE PREVENTION WEEK 2026
City Council will present a proclamation recognizing October 4–10, 2026, as Fire Prevention Week in
Avondale and encourage residents to practice safe charging habits to reduce the risk of lithium-ion
battery fires. This item is for discussion only.
Monday, September 28, 2026 - Page 2 of 3

Page 3 of 30

3.

UNSCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCES (Time is limited per person. Please state your name.)

4.

CONSENT AGENDA
Items on the consent agenda are of a routine nature or have been previously studied by the City Council
at a work session. They are intended to be acted upon in one motion. Council members may pull items
from consent if they would like them considered separately.
a.

MINUTES
City Council will consider a request to approve the August 31, 2026, City Council meeting minutes.
The Council will take appropriate action.

b.

SERIES 12 (RESTAURANT) LIQUOR LICENSE — COLDWATER SPRINGS GOLF CLUB
City Council will consider a request to recommend approval to the Arizona Department of Liquor
License and Control of an application for a Series 12 (Restaurant) Liquor License submitted by
Andrea Lewkowitz for the sale of alcohol at Coldwater Springs Golf Club located at 100 North
Clubhouse Drive in Avondale and authorize the City Clerk to execute the necessary documents. The
Council will take appropriate action.

5.

SUMMARY OF CURRENT EVENTS FROM MAYOR, VICE MAYOR, AND COUNCILMEMBERS
(5 minutes)

6.

ADJOURNMENT

Councilmembers of the City of Avondale will attend either in person or by telephone or video conference call. Individuals with special accessibility needs,
including sight or hearing impaired, large print, or interpreter, should contact the City Clerk at 623-333-1000 or TDD 623-333-0010 at least two business
days prior to the Council Meeting.
Los miembros del Concejo de la Ciudad de Avondale participaran ya sea en persona o por medio de llamada telefonica o por vídeo. Personas con
necesidades especiales de accesibilidad, incluyendo personas con impedimentos de vista u oido, o con necesidad de impresion grande o interprete,
deben comunicarse con la Secretaria de la Ciudad at 623-333-1000 o TDD 623-333-0010 cuando menos dos dias habiles antes de la junta del Concejo.

Monday, September 28, 2026 - Page 3 of 3

Page 4 of 30

CITY COUNCIL REPORT
ITEM NUMBER:

2.b.

SUBJECT:

Proclamation - Fire Prevention Week 2026

MEETING DATE:

9/28/2026

TO:

Mayor and Council

FROM:

Larry Rooney, Fire Chief

THROUGH:

Renee Weatherless, Assistant City Manager, (623) 333-1017

REVIEWED:

Ron Corbin, City Manager, (623) 333-1011

STRATEGIC PLAN:
This agenda item supports the following Avondale Strategic Outcome Area: Connected Community —
Avondale informs, prepares, and engages our community to ensure residents are connected to resources, the
region, and each other.

PURPOSE:
City Council will present a proclamation recognizing October 4–10, 2026, as Fire Prevention Week in Avondale
and encourage residents to practice safe charging habits to reduce the risk of lithium-ion battery fires. This
item is for discussion only.
BACKGROUND:
Fire Prevention Week is observed annually to raise public awareness of fire prevention and life safety. The
2026 theme, “Charge into Fire Safety™: Safe Charging Is a Superpower,” focuses on everyday charging
practices that can reduce the risk of fires involving lithium-ion batteries.
Lithium-ion batteries power many commonly used devices, including smartphones, tablets, laptops, power
tools, electric bicycles, and electric scooters. As the use of these devices increases, public education regarding
their safe purchase, charging, use, storage, and disposal remains an important component of community fire
prevention.

DISCUSSION:
Avondale Fire & Medical supports Fire Prevention Week through public education and community outreach.
Residents can help reduce the risk of lithium-ion battery fires by using manufacturer-approved charging
equipment, charging devices on hard, stable surfaces, avoiding overcharging, monitoring batteries for signs of
damage or overheating, and properly recycling or disposing of unwanted batteries.
Recognizing Fire Prevention Week reinforces the City’s commitment to fire safety and encourages residents,

Page 5 of 30

businesses, and community organizations to take practical steps to protect lives and property.

BUDGET IMPACT:
This item does not have a budget impact.
RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for discussion only.
Contact person for document distribution: Larry Rooney, Scott Miller, Kristin Zipprich

Page 6 of 30

PROCLAMATION
FIRE PREVENTION WEEK
Whereas, the City of Avondale is committed to ensuring the safety and security of all those living
in, working in, and visiting our community; and
Whereas, fire is a serious public safety concern, and rechargeable devices are increasingly used in
everyday life, including smartphones, tablets, laptops, power tools, electric bicycles, and electric
scooters; and
Whereas, the National Fire Protection Association has designated October 4–10, 2026, as Fire
Prevention Week, featuring the theme, “Charge into Fire Safety™: Safe Charging Is a Superpower”;
and
Whereas, lithium-ion batteries can overheat, catch fire, or explode when damaged, defective,
improperly charged, or used with incompatible charging equipment; and
Whereas, residents can reduce the risk of lithium-ion battery fires by using charging equipment
supplied or recommended by the manufacturer, charging devices on hard and stable surfaces,
avoiding overcharging, and discontinuing use of batteries that show signs of damage, swelling,
overheating, leaking, or unusual odors; and
Whereas, working smoke alarms and a practiced home fire escape plan provide additional
protection by helping occupants receive early warning and safely escape a fire; and
Whereas, Avondale Fire & Medical is dedicated to protecting life and property through fire
prevention, public education, community outreach, and emergency response; and
Whereas, residents, businesses, and community organizations play an important role in preventing
fires by understanding fire risks and practicing safe charging habits.
NOW, THEREFORE, on behalf of the Avondale City Council, the City of Avondale, Arizona, hereby
proclaims October 4–10, 2026, as Fire Prevention Week in Avondale and encourages all residents,
businesses, and community organizations to practice safe device charging, regularly test their
smoke alarms, maintain and practice a home fire escape plan, and support fire prevention efforts
throughout the community.
Proclaimed this 28th day of September 2026.

_________________________________
Mayor

Attest: _________________________________
City Clerk

Making Lives Better | Helpful - Kind - Professional

Page 7 of 30

CITY COUNCIL REPORT
ITEM NUMBER:

4.a.

SUBJECT:

Minutes

MEETING DATE:

9/28/2026

TO:

Mayor and Council

FROM:

Marcella Sarmiento, City Clerk

THROUGH:

Jennifer Stein, Assistant City Manager, (623) 333-1014

REVIEWED:

Ron Corbin, City Manager, (623) 333-1011

STRATEGIC PLAN:
This agenda item supports the following Avondale Strategic Outcome Area: Connected & Engaged
Community
Avondale informs, prepares, and engages our community to ensure residents are connected to resources, the
region, and each other.

PURPOSE:
City Council will consider a request to approve the August 31, 2026, City Council meeting minutes. The
Council will take appropriate action.
BACKGROUND:
Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statute § 38-431.01(B), the City must provide written minutes of all City Council
meetings.
DISCUSSION:
City Council held a meeting and the attached minutes have been prepared for approval.
BUDGET IMPACT:
This item has no budget impact.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends City Council approve the attached City Council meeting minutes.
Contact person for document distribution: Veronica Moreno, Emily Soria, Yaritzi Sicairos

Page 8 of 30

MINUTES OF THE AVONDALE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF AVONDALE, ARIZONA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER
August 31st, 2026
A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Avondale, Arizona was convened at
11465 West Civic Center Drive in open and public session at 5:30 p.m.
Mayor Mike Pineda led the Pledge of Allegiance, followed by a moment of silent reflection.
Members Present: Mayor Mike Pineda; Vice Mayor Curtis Nielson; Councilmembers
Tina Conde, Jeannette Garcia, Gloria Solorio, Shari Weise, and Max White*.
*Councilmember White attended the meeting virtually.
Members Absent: None.
Other Municipal Officials Present: Ron Corbin, City Manager; Jennifer Stein, Assistant
City Manager; Andrew Mesquita, Assistant City Manager; Renee Weatherless, Assistant
City Manager; Nicholle Harris, City Attorney; Marcella Sarmiento, City Clerk; Edith
Baltierrez, Neighborhood and Family Services Assistant Director; Liz Barker Alvarez,
Intergovernmental Affairs Administrator; Kirk Beaty, Public Works Director; Memo
Espinoza, Police Chief; Joel Evans, Facilities Director; Fina Johnson; Acting Finance and
Budget Director; Ted Flores, Human Resources Director; Ingrid Melle, Deputy Marketing
& Public Relations Director; Kimberly Moon, Engineering Director; Jodie Novak,
Development Services Director; Larry Rooney, Fire Chief; Jeffrey Scheetz, Chief
Information Officer; and Cheryl Covert, Economic Development Director.
Audience: Approximately 20 members of the public were present.
1. ROLL CALL BY THE CITY CLERK
2. UNSCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCES
Barney Hernandez, spokesperson for the Forever 12 Movement, urged the City to
consider locating a HAWK signal at 121st Lane and Lower Buckeye Road rather than the
proposed greenbelt location east of Cantada Ranch. He cited existing pedestrian use at
the intersection, including access to parks, schools, and nearby neighborhoods, and
requested that the final engineering report consider community input and evaluate
concerns associated with the proposed location beneath SRP electrical towers.
Zakaria Shahzada, resident, opposed the use of Flock Safety cameras, citing concerns
regarding privacy, potential surveillance of law-abiding residents, data collection and
retention, and possible misuse of law enforcement database access. The speaker
requested that the City not implement the system.
Joe Phoenix requested Council review and reduce the Planning and Development fees
associated with an accessory dwelling unit permit. He stated that the fees were excessive

Page 9 of 30

Regular Meeting
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 31, 2026
Page 2 of 16

compared with past local fees and a cited City of Phoenix project. He requested a
maximum fee of $500, and expressed concerns regarding staff communication,
consistency in fee administration, and the impacts on retired residents.
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Items on the consent agenda are of a routine nature or have been previously studied by
the City Council at a work session. They are intended to be acted upon in one motion.
Councilmembers may pull items from consent if they would like them considered
separately.
Mayor Pineda asked if any Councilmember wished to have an item removed from the
Consent Agenda. Having no requests from Council, motion was made by Vice Mayor
Nielson, seconded by Councilmember Solorio, to approve the Consent Agenda.
Upon vote, the motion was carried unanimously 7 to 0.
Councilmember Conde
Councilmember Garcia
Councilmember Solorio
Councilmember Weise
Councilmember White
Vice Mayor Nielson
Mayor Pineda

Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye

a. FIRST AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE
CITY OF AVONDALE PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION LOCAL
3924
City Council considered a request to amend the Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) between the City of Avondale and Avondale Professional Firefighters
Association (APFFA) Local 3924 to modify Sections 4.8 and 8.10 to align with the
policy modifications to City of Avondale Chapter Policy 6 and modifications to the
City's payroll system configurations and authorized the Mayor or City Manager, City
Attorney and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents.
b. RESOLUTION 1062-0826--- AMENDMENTS TO AVONDALE PERSONNEL
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES, CHAPTER 5 CLASSIFICATION AND
COMPENSATION
City Council considered a request to adopt Resolution 1062-0826, amending the
Personnel Policies and Procedures Chapter Policy 5, Classification and
Compensation to align Chapter Policy with Administrative Policy 95, Compensation,
which allows employees serving a promotional probation to receive any approved
merit increase on the same schedule as non-probationary employees, and authorized
the Mayor or City Manager, City Attorney and City Clerk to execute the necessary
documents.

Page 10 of 30

Regular Meeting
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 31, 2026
Page 3 of 16

c. RESOLUTION 1063-0826 AMENDMENTS TO AVONDALE PERSONNEL
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES, CHAPTER 6, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
City Council considered a request to adopt Resolution 1063-0826, amending the
Personnel Policies and Procedures Chapter Policy 6, Employee Benefits to increase
the military leave benefit for regular employees who are or may be members of the
National Guard or Military Reserve (U.S. Armed Forces), and authorized the Mayor or
City Manager, City Attorney and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents.
d. AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS FO FAMILY BRIDGE
HOUSING
City Council considered a request to approve an agreement with A New Leaf relating
to the operation and maintenance of the Avondale Family Bridge Homes and
authorized the Mayor or City Manager, City Attorney and City Clerk to execute the
necessary documents.
e. ORDINANCE 2032-0826--- LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH TOWER LEASE
AGREEMENT- ATC SITE 420051 (COLDWATER SPRINGS)
City Council considered a request to adopt Ordinance 2032-0826, approving the First
Amendment to Tower Lease Agreement with Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon
Wireless, acting through ATC Sequoia LLC as attorney-in-fact, for ATC Site No.
420051 (Coldwater Springs), to extend the lease term, revise rent and escalation
provisions, and update other lease terms, and authorized the Mayor or City Manager,
City Attorney and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents.
f. ORDINANCE 2033-0826, 2034-0826,2035-0826 AND 2036-0826---GRANTING OF
UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ARIZONA PBULIC SERVICE RELATED TO FIRE
STATION 171
City Council considered a request to adopt Ordinances 2033-0826, 2034-0826, 20350826, and 2036-0826, authorizing granting four (4) utility easements to Arizona Public
Service as they relate to Fire Station 171 and authorized the Mayor or City Manager,
City Attorney and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents.
4. REGULAR AGENDA
a. ORDINANCE 2037-0826 - AMENDING THE CITY OF AVONDALE CITY CODE,
CHAPTER 23 (TRAFFIC), ARTICLE I (IN GENERAL), SECTION 23-69 (GOPEDS (MOTORIZED SKATEBOARDS)), SECTION 23-74 (PENALTIES),
ARTICLE IV (BICYCLES) (DIVISION 1 –GENERALLY) SECTION 23-76
(DEFINITIONS), AND ADDING A NEW DIVISION 3 (ELECTRIC DRIVEN
DEVICES) TO ARTICLE IV (BICYCLES) — ELECTRIC DRIVENDEVICES
City Council considered a request to adopt Ordinance 2037-0826 - amending the
City of Avondale City Code, Chapter 23 (Traffic), Article I (In General), Section 2369 (Go-Peds (Motorized Skateboards)), Section 23-74 (Penalties), Article IV
(Bicycles) (Division 1 – Generally) Section 23-76 (Definitions), and adding a new
Division 3 (Electric Driven Devices) to Article IV (Bicycles), and authorized the
Mayor or City Manager, City Attorney and City Clerk to execute the necessary
documents.

Page 11 of 30

Regular Meeting
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 31, 2026
Page 4 of 16

The Police Department Chief Espinoza and Lieutenant Alt presented a revised
proposed ordinance regulating e-bikes, e-scooters, and other electric-driven
devices. The ordinance was originally developed in February 2026 and presented
to City Council on June 22, 2026. Following Council feedback, the Police
Department reviewed and incorporated the recommendations and made revisions
for City Council’s consideration and vote.
The proposed ordinance expands the City’s definitions to address emerging forms
of electric transportation that may not fall under existing Arizona Revised Statutes
definitions. The proposed definition includes personal transportation devices
powered wholly or partly by an electric motor, including electric bicycles, stand-up
scooters, electric skateboards, self-balancing one-wheel devices, and multi-wheel
devices. Medical mobility devices are excluded.
The ordinance establishes safety requirements for operating electric-driven
devices on sidewalks and roadways. Riders would be required to:





Yield the right-of-way when appropriate.
Travel at a reasonable and prudent speed.
Obey posted restrictions and areas where riding is prohibited.
Operate in a manner that allows for safe movement.
Avoid suddenly entering the path of vehicles.
Travel in the same direction as traffic when operating on roadways.

For e-bikes operated on roadways, riders would also be required to follow
applicable Arizona bicycle laws and use a designated bike lane when one is
available.
For e-scooters, additional requirements would apply to sidewalk and roadway use.
E-scooters could not be operated on roadways with speed limits exceeding 25 mph.
Riders would also be required to yield to pedestrians and provide an audible
warning when approaching pedestrians.
Electric-driven devices operated on sidewalks would be limited to a maximum
speed of 10 mph and must be operated at a reasonable and prudent speed. If a
hazard or unsafe condition exists, the operator would be required to dismount and
walk the device to a safe location before continuing. Roadway users must travel
with the flow of traffic.
The ordinance also establishes equipment requirements. Operators under 16
would be required to wear helmets and closed-toed shoes. Devices would need
functional brakes and appropriately visible lights. Operators would also be required
to have an audible warning device, such as a bell, or be able to provide an audible
warning using their voice.
The proposed ordinance establishes age restrictions based on the type of device:

Under 16: Prohibited from operating a Class 3 e-bike.

Page 12 of 30

Regular Meeting
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 31, 2026
Page 5 of 16


Under 14: Prohibited from operating Class 1 or Class 2 e-bikes.
Under 12: Prohibited from operating an e-scooter.

Parental responsibility would be addressed through the existing Arizona Revised
Statutes provisions concerning contributing to the delinquency of a minor.
The proposed ordinance would permit electric-driven devices on designated park
sidewalks unless prohibited by park rules or posted signage. However, devices
would not be permitted on park grass, plazas, sports courts, splash pads,
amphitheaters, or designated vendor corridor areas. These restrictions are
intended to reduce conflicts with pedestrians and protect park facilities and
amenities.
A graduated civil penalty structure is proposed based on violations occurring within
a 12-month period:



First violation: $50
Second violation: $250
Third and subsequent violations: $500
Payment plan court fee: $20

If adopted, the Police Department recommends a comprehensive six-month
warning and educational period before enforcement begins. The goal is to give
residents sufficient time to understand the new regulations and comply with the
requirements.
Education and outreach would include:







City social media messaging.
Presentations and outreach at schools for students and parents.
HOA and community events.
Media releases.
Resident notification messaging.
Electronic billboard messages.
Educational handouts at city events and public facilities.
Training for Police Department employees to promote consistent
understanding and enforcement.

The proposed ordinance is intended to establish clear and consistent regulations
for e-bikes, e-scooters, and other electric-driven devices while promoting safety for
riders, pedestrians, motorists, and the community. The recommendations seek to
balance the increasing use of electric transportation with the need to protect public
safety and City infrastructure. If adopted, the six-month education and warning
period would provide residents an opportunity to become familiar with the new
requirements before enforcement begins.

Page 13 of 30

Regular Meeting
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 31, 2026
Page 6 of 16

Councilmember Conde asked whether the proposed ordinance requires helmets
for passengers on e-bikes. Staff clarified that operating a single-seat e-bike with
more than one rider would violate the ordinance, and that the operator would be
responsible for the violation.
Councilmember Weise requested clarification regarding the proposed restriction
on e-scooters operating on roadways with posted speed limits exceeding 25 mph.
Staff confirmed that e-scooters would not be permitted in bicycle lanes on
roadways posted at 35 or 40 mph and would need to operate off the roadway.
Councilmember White expressed support for the proposed ordinance and
requested additional information regarding the age restriction for Class 3 e-bikes.
She asked whether statewide licensing requirements or related legislation were
being considered. Staff responded that the recommended age requirements were
consistent with those adopted or proposed by neighboring cities, including
Goodyear, Glendale, and Phoenix. Staff stated that he was not aware of any
current statewide effort to require licensing for Class 3 e-bikes and indicated that
the City’s Intergovernmental Affairs staff would confirm whether any related
legislative proposals were pending.
Councilmember White noted that e-bike policy discussions were occurring at
federal and broader levels and encouraged the City to monitor incidents and
emerging regulations. She also requested consideration of extending the proposed
six-month implementation period to one year to allow additional time for public
education, awareness, and enforcement, and to reduce potential financial impacts
on families who rely on electric transportation for school commuting.
Mr. Corbin stated that the implementation and enforcement timeline is an
administrative matter for the Police Department and does not require an ordinance
amendment. He indicated that staff would consider Council’s feedback during
implementation, evaluate the effectiveness of public education efforts, and have
officers assess enforcement situations individually.
Councilmember Solorio expressed appreciation for staff’s work in developing the
ordinance, stating that the proposal was intentional, precise, and clear. She voiced
support for the recommended provisions.
Mayor Pineda asked whether the proposed City ordinance would apply to e-bike
use within residential communities that may also be subject to homeowners’
association rules. Lieutenant Alt confirmed that the ordinance would constitute City
code and would apply accordingly.
Hearing no further questions, Mayor Pineda opened the floor to a motion.
Councilmember Solorio moved to adopt Ordinance 2037-0826, amending the City
of Avondale City Code, Chapter 23 (Traffic) and authorize the Mayor or City
Manager, City Attorney and City Clerk to execute the necessary documents; Vice
Mayor Nielson seconded the motion.

Page 14 of 30

Regular Meeting
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 31, 2026
Page 7 of 16

Councilmember Garcia expressed support for the proposed ordinance, citing
increasing safety concerns related to e-bikes and e-scooters. She emphasized the
importance of educating residents and parents during the implementation period,
including through warnings and outreach, and stated that she would vote in favor
of the item to promote community safety.
Councilmember Conde expressed support for the proposed ordinance and
requested consideration of two amendments: lowering the minimum age for escooter operation from 12 to 11 years old and removing the requirement for riders
to wear closed-toe shoes. She stated that these changes reflected feedback
received from community members and individuals who work with children.
Councilmember Conde made the motion to amend the main motion changing the
age from 12 to 11; Councilmember Garcia seconded the motion.
Councilmember Weiss requested clarification that Council was considering the
amended motion to reduce the minimum e-scooter age from 12 to 11. She asked
about age restrictions in surrounding communities and the basis for the originally
proposed age of 12. Staff noted that Goodyear, Glendale, and Phoenix restrict escooter operation by individuals under age 12, while Peoria and Surprise do not
specify age restrictions. Mayor Pineda clarified that the age of 12 had been
suggested during prior Council discussion rather than by staff. Councilmember
Weiss also referenced the American Academy of Pediatrics’ recommendation that
e-scooter riders be at least 16 years old.
Councilmember Conde supported setting the minimum e-scooter age at 11, noting
Avondale’s family-oriented community and the need for youth transportation to
school and local parks. She emphasized that education and parental or guardian
judgment could help promote safe operation by younger riders.
Vice Mayor Nielsen expressed support for allowing e-scooter use by some 11year-olds, noting that responsible parental guidance and a child’s demonstrated
ability can support safe travel to school. She emphasized that an age limit should
recognize that individual maturity and transportation needs may vary.
Councilmember White expressed support for lowering the minimum age and
emphasized that safety should remain the primary focus. She advocated for a
comprehensive education and outreach effort, including coordination with schools
and exploration of Safe Routes to School grant opportunities to support active
transportation. She also recommended allowing sufficient time for education
before enforcement and noted potential transportation and economic impacts on
families whose children use e-scooters to travel to school.
Upon vote, the amended motion was carried 4 to 3.
Councilmember Conde
Councilmember Garcia

Aye
Aye

Page 15 of 30

Regular Meeting
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 31, 2026
Page 8 of 16

Councilmember White
Vice Mayor Nielson

Aye
Aye

Councilmember Solorio
Councilmember Weise
Mayor Pineda

Nay
Nay
Nay

Councilmember Conde made the motion to amend the main motion by removing
the requirement to be wearing closed-toe shoes; Councilmember Wiese seconded
the motion.
Councilmember Garcia discussed safety considerations related to footwear, noting
that closed-toe shoes may help reduce foot injuries. She also acknowledged that,
given Arizona’s climate and practical limitations, some youth may continue to ride
e-scooters while wearing sandals or flip-flops.
Councilmember Conde supported removing the closed-toe shoe requirement,
stating that footwear choices should remain the responsibility of parents and
guardians rather than be regulated by the City. She noted that she had not
observed children riding e-scooters in open-toe footwear and cited neighboring
jurisdictions, including Goodyear, as not imposing a similar requirement.
Councilmember Weise stated that she had proposed the closed-toe shoe
requirement based on injury-risk information related to e-scooter use. She
indicated support for removing the mandate if footwear safety, along with
protective and visibility measures, is addressed through rider education.
Councilmember Garcia asked if motorcycle riders must wear closed-toed shoes.
Lieutenant Alt replied that it is not a requirement.
Councilmember White asked if closed-toed shoes are required while driving in
Arizona. Lieutenant Alt replied that is not a requirement.
Councilmember White supported not regulating footwear for e-scooter riders,
emphasizing parental discretion and the practical context of children using
scooters recreationally near their homes. She stated that safety education should
be balanced with allowing families to make appropriate choices for their children.
Mayor Pineda recognized Councilmember Conde’s request regarding helmet
education and potential helmet distribution and invited further Council discussion
following staff’s response.
Councilmember White commended staff and public safety personnel for prioritizing
youth safety. She emphasized the importance of a comprehensive safety
education program involving police, fire, and traffic-safety instruction, and

Page 16 of 30

Regular Meeting
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 31, 2026
Page 9 of 16

encouraged staff to consider Cleveland Heights’ longstanding Safety Town
program as a potential model.
Mayor Pineda expressed initial support for the closed-toe shoe provision based on
safety concerns but acknowledged concerns about the appropriate extent of City
regulation of residents’ personal choices. He stated that Council should deliberate
and vote.
Upon vote, the amended motion was carried unanimously 7 to 0.
Councilmember Conde
Councilmember Garcia
Councilmember Solorio
Councilmember Weise
Councilmember White
Vice Mayor Nielson
Mayor Pineda

Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye

Councilmember Solorio moved to adopt the main motion – adopting Ordinance
2037-0826, amending the City of Avondale City Code, Chapter 23 (Traffic) and
authorize the Mayor or City Manager, City Attorney and City Clerk to execute the
necessary documents, as amended (changing the age from 12 to 11 and removing
the requirement to be wearing closed-toe shoes); Vice Mayor Nielson seconded
the motion.
Upon vote, the motion was carried unanimously 7 to 0.
Councilmember Conde
Councilmember Garcia
Councilmember Solorio
Councilmember Weise
Councilmember White
Vice Mayor Nielson
Mayor Pineda

Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye

b. WATER SYSTEM FLUORIDATION DISCUSSION
City Council received a presentation on adding fluoride to a Public Water System
(PWS), also known as fluoridation. This item was for discussion only.
Public Works Assistant Director Eric Bay presented information regarding water
system fluoridation at the request of the Water Division. The presentation was
provided for informational and discussion purposes only; no action or direction was
requested from City Council.
Mr. Bay provided background on fluoride, including its natural occurrence in soil
and groundwater, federal drinking water standards, and recommendations from
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Dental

Page 17 of 30

Regular Meeting
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 31, 2026
Page 10 of 16

Association. He explained that the City of Avondale does not currently add fluoride
to its water system; however, fluoride occurs naturally in the City’s groundwater.
During 2024, fluoride concentrations ranged from non-detectable levels to 1.1
parts per million, with an average of 0.27 parts per million.
Mr. Bay outlined the potential requirements for implementing a fluoridation
program, including site-specific testing, a feasibility study, engineering and design,
installation of dosing equipment, employee training, safety procedures, personal
protective equipment, and ongoing operational requirements. The estimated
annual chemical cost is approximately $25,000; however, the total implementation
cost could not be accurately determined without a feasibility study.
Mr. Bay presented a comparison of local municipalities:
Does Add Fluoride

Does Not Add Fluoride

Phoenix

Avondale

Chandler

Goodyear

Gilbert

Carefree

Glendale

Gila Bend

Mesa

Paradise Valley

Peoria

Queen Creek

Tempe

Scottsdale
Surprise
Wickenburg

Mr. Bay noted that implementation could require significant infrastructure
investment at multiple well sites and could affect the City’s PFAS treatment
strategy because certain PFAS treatment processes may also remove fluoride
from the water. Additional costs could include equipment replacement, employee
training, safety equipment, and ongoing maintenance.
Mr. Bay reviewed the health considerations associated with fluoride levels, the
presence of naturally occurring fluoride in Avondale’s groundwater, and the fact
that residents may use reverse-osmosis systems that remove fluoride from
drinking water.
Following discussion, Councilmembers
informational presentation.

expressed

appreciation

for

the

In response to a question from Councilmember White, Mr. Bay explained staff were
unable to obtain a cost estimate as it has been several years since the local
engineering firm had provided any sort of design or engineers’ cost estimate. Mr.

Page 18 of 30

Regular Meeting
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 31, 2026
Page 11 of 16

Corbin explained it would likely be a six-figure study which would then provide an
estimate cost.
Councilmember White shared information regarding fluorosis that she obtained
from Clevland Clinic organization.
Councilmember Weise explained the topic was brought forward from a question
from a resident who is present at the meeting.
Vice Mayor Nielson shared his personal experience with fluoride.
Mayor Pineda thanked staff for the presentation and echoed the comments from
City Council; the consensus was that fluoridation was not a priority at this time,
particularly given the potential costs, infrastructure requirements, PFAS treatment
considerations, and policy implications.
No formal action was taken.
PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED:
• Naya Smith – Avondale Resident
I am writing in support of community water fluoridation in Avondale. Avondale’s
water contains naturally occurring fluoride, but at approximately 0.27 parts per
million, it is well below the 0.7 ppm level recommended for preventing tooth decay.
Many Arizona communities, including Phoenix, Mesa, Glendale, Chandler, Gilbert,
Scottsdale, Tempe, Peoria, and others, adjust the fluoride in their water to provide
this benefit to their residents. Avondale families deserve access to the same
proven public health measure, especially because preventing cavities should not
depend on a family’s income or ability to regularly access dental care. I appreciate
the Council considering this issue and ask the City to move forward with exploring
what would be required to bring Avondale’s water to the recommended fluoride
level of 0.7 ppm.
5. SUMMARY OF CURRENT EVENTS FROM MAYOR, VICE MAYOR, AND
COUNCILMEMBERS
Councilmember White recognized local student athletes for their achievements in the
cross-country competitions recently held in Flagstaff. She shared the concerns of
residents who lost power during the recent storms and noted the importance of reliable
utilities. She noted her attendance at the League of Arizona Cities and Towns Conference
and participation in Valley Metro, thanking City Council for the opportunity to serve in that
role. In closing, she noted her attendance at the football kickoff for the Fiesta Sports
Foundation.
Councilmember Garica expressed her appreciation to the local nonprofit organizations
for their contributions to the community.

Page 19 of 30

Regular Meeting
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 31, 2026
Page 12 of 16

Councilmember Solorio expressed her appreciation to staff for their efforts supporting City
Council at the League of Arizona Cities and Towns Conference. She expressed her
appreciation to Public Safety staff for their efforts this past month.
Councilmember Weise expressed her appreciation to Public Safety for showing support
to residents, Dan and Barb Schuh.
Vice Mayor Nielson noted his attendance at the Arizona Water Users meeting and spoke
about the recent drought discussions, noting Public Works and other agencies have plans
in place.
Mayor Pineda expressed his appreciation to staff for their efforts during the recent
monsoon storms and expressed appreciation for the prompt response provided by City
staff, including Public Works, Parks and Recreation, Police, Fire, and other departments.
He recognized the City’s growing healthcare sector and educational partnerships that
contribute to workforce development. The Mayor and Council expressed appreciation to
Assistant City Manager Dale Nannenga for his 46 years of public service and
congratulated him on his retirement. Congratulations were also extended to staff
members assuming new leadership roles within the City of Avondale.
6. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Council, Councilmember Garcia moved to
adjourn the Regular Meeting; Councilmember Conde seconded the motion.
Upon vote, the motion was carried unanimously 7 to 0.
Councilmember Conde
Councilmember Garcia
Councilmember Solorio
Councilmember Weise
Councilmember White
Vice Mayor Nielson
Mayor Pineda

Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye

The meeting was adjourned at 6:57 p.m.

_____________________________
Mike Pineda, Mayor

Page 20 of 30

Regular Meeting
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 31, 2026
Page 13 of 16

CERTIFICATION AND ATTESTATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing minutes are a true and correct copy of the minutes of
the Regular Meeting of the Council of the City of Avondale held on the 31st day of August
2026. I further certify that the meeting was duly called and held, and that the quorum was
present.
________________________________
Marcella Sarmiento, City Clerk

________________________________
Date Approved by City Council

Page 21 of 30

Regular Meeting
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 31, 2026
Page 14 of 16

PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED:
• Michael Hofmann – Avondale Resident:
Mayor Pineda and Members of the Avondale City Council, I am again asking you to end
Avondale's automated mass surveillance program. Not regulate it. Not add another
policy. Not replace Flock Safety with another vendor. End it. Stop deployment of the 58
additional license plate reader cameras funded in the FY2027 budget and begin
dismantling the existing network. Other Arizona communities have already demonstrated
that government can say no to this technology. Tempe turned off its Flock cameras and
ended its contract. Mayor Corey Woods acknowledged that the cameras had assisted
police but concluded, "the risk of misuse is too great." Tempe also said it would not
replace Flock with another ALPR company. Pinal County Sheriff Ross Teeple announced
that his office would not renew its Flock contract, specifically raising the Fourth
Amendment and his responsibility to protect individual liberties. Chandler discontinued its
40 fixed Flock cameras after an audit identified an unexplained anomaly involving use of
the system. Surprise canceled its Flock contract following an investigation into potential
misuse. These communities did not have to wait for a catastrophe before acting. Neither
does Avondale. Avondale's FY2027 budget identifies 15 existing license plate reader
cameras and provides $239,000 in ongoing funding for 58 additional cameras. The stated
objective is "city wide coverage." If fully deployed, that could mean 73 license plate reader
cameras throughout Avondale. The same budget includes $120,000 for the Public Safety
Drone Program and $103,000 for Police Data Sharing. It also states that Avondale can
search camera information made available through more than 140 law enforcement
agencies sharing their cameras with the city. This is not a handful of cameras helping an
officer investigate a specific crime. This is surveillance infrastructure. The Fourth
Amendment exists because government power requires limits. Supreme Court decisions
including United States v. Jones, Riley v. California and Carpenter v. United States have
recognized the constitutional implications that arise when technology dramatically
expands government's ability to collect and reconstruct information about people's lives
and movements. There is a fundamental difference between a police officer seeing my
license plate on a public road and government infrastructure automatically recording
where vehicles travel, storing those observations, searching them later and combining
them with information collected by agencies across the country. Residents should not
have to wait until that information is abused before objecting to its collection. The people
operating these systems today will not necessarily be the people operating them
tomorrow. Laws change. Leaders change. Definitions of wrongdoing change. The
surveillance infrastructure remains. That is why another safeguard is not the answer.
Neither is a shorter retention period, another audit, a new policy or a different vendor. The
problem is the mass-surveillance network itself. My request to Council is simple: End the
58-camera expansion. End Avondale's automated license plate reader program. End
participation in mass location-surveillance networks. Do not replace Flock with another
surveillance vendor or rebuild the same system under another name. Tempe
demonstrated that an Arizona city can decide the risk is too great. Pinal County
demonstrated that Arizona law enforcement can cite the Fourth Amendment and
individual liberty as reasons to walk away. Avondale can make that choice too. I am
asking you to make it. End mass surveillance in Avondale. [sources and links not included]

Page 22 of 30

Regular Meeting
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 31, 2026
Page 15 of 16

• Michelle Caddell – Avondale Resident
My name is Michelle Caddell. I Have a masters in business administration, specializing
in Information systems. I understand the value of information and the way others can
profit off of personal information and privacy. Here are more of my concerns with Flock
cameras. I would like to join the other cities in Arizona that have canceled their Flock
contracts. It is less stressful to drive in a city where Flock cameras or similar cameras
aren't being used. Tempe, Cave Creek, Apache Junction, Chandler, Pinal County, Sierra
Vista, City of South Tucson, Flagstaff, Sedona Misuse Google AI Overview-How many
cases of misuse of Flock cameras by law enforcement? Documented Cases and
StatisticsFlock-Specific Incidents: An investigative report by The Washington Post tallied
at least 46 instances where officers improperly accessed or abused Flock Safety
equipment. Broader ALPR Misuse: The Institute for Justice Database of ALPR Abuse has
cataloged more than 100 total incidents of license plate reader misconduct nationwide.
Recent Investigations: A USA Today investigation identified at least 19 law enforcement
employees across five states who were investigated, fired, or arrested for improper
tracking. KTAR NEWS-Goodyear investigating potential misuse of Flock technology by
officerA criminal investigation is underway after an internal affairs audit found potential
misuse of Flock Safety’s automated license plate reader technology by a Goodyear police
officer. The officer has been put on administrative leave and had their access to the
department’s computers restricted.The Glendale Police Department is conducting the
criminal probe. The Goodyear Police Department will resume its administrative
investigation into the potential misuse when it is complete. Is Mass Surveillance A
Violation of Human Rights? Per Google AI Overview-Yes, international bodies and human
rights organizations widely consider mass surveillance to be a violation of the human right
to privacy. The Human Rights Impact Right to Privacy: Indiscriminate data collection
interferes directly with international protections for private life and communications.
Chilling Effect: Bulk monitoring suppresses freedoms of expression, assembly, and the
press by making people fearful of speaking or protesting freely. Presumption of Guilt:
Mass surveillance treats an entire population as suspected wrongdoers rather than
respecting individual innocence. Mass surveillance without a warrant is generally legal in
public spaces within Arizona, though it faces intense legal scrutiny, ongoing legislative
battles, and strong pushback from civil liberties groups.Under both federal and state laws,
the legality of warrantless surveillance depends heavily on whether an individual has a
"reasonable expectation of privacy" in the specific context being monitored. A reasonable
expectation of privacy is a legal test used under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S.
Constitution to decide if a government search or surveillance is legal. The Data
Aggregation Debate Mass tracking concerns: Civil liberties organizations, such as the
American Civil NOT SPEAKING Liberties Union, argue that linking thousands of cameras
creates a continuous surveillance dragnet. Digital privacy limits: Landmark rulings like
Carpenter v. United States and Chatrie v. United States establish that long-term or
comprehensive location tracking can infringe on personal privacy. As technology evolves
so should the laws to protect people's privacy. Everyone should not be treated like a
criminal. With the use of mass surveillance cameras like Flock cameras, landscaping our
front yards without law enforcement cameras watching feels like a privilege.

Page 23 of 30

Regular Meeting
City Council Meeting Minutes
August 31, 2026
Page 16 of 16

• Hilary McKillip – Avondale Resident
I see that almost a quarter of a million dollars has been allotted on the 2027 budget for
Automatic License Plate Reader Cameras, more commonly known as ALPRs I am
against these and do not want my taxpayer money funding mass surveillance of myself
and my neighbors. ALPRs are unreliable, at best, and dangerous, at worst. The Institute
for Justice reviewed media reports and court records and identified at least 27 cases since
2018 in which innocent motorists were stopped, detained, or arrested following errors
involving stationary ALPR systems. In nearly two-thirds of the cases IJ analyzed, officers
pointed guns at innocent people before discovering the error. I am not asking Council to
choose between privacy and public safety. I am asking Council to consider documented
evidence of wrongful stops, misuse and data-sharing concerns before expanding
Avondale's surveillance infrastructure. Once 58 additional cameras are deployed, the
infrastructure already exists regardless of how policies, vendors, leadership or laws
change in the future. Say no to Flock and other surveillance systems. They do not make
us safer

Page 24 of 30

CITY COUNCIL REPORT
ITEM NUMBER:

4.b.

SUBJECT:

Series 12 (Restaurant) Liquor License — Coldwater Springs Golf Club

MEETING DATE:

9/28/2026

TO:

Mayor and Council

FROM:

Marcella Sarmiento, City Clerk

THROUGH:

Jennifer Stein, Assistant City Manager, (623) 333-1014

REVIEWED:

Ron Corbin, City Manager, (623) 333-1011

STRATEGIC PLAN:
This agenda item supports the following Avondale Strategic Outcome Area: Economic Growth and
Prosperity
Avondale supports a thriving local economy by fostering and supporting business growth, job creation, and
workforce development. The City advances economic development, attracts high-quality entertainment and
full-service amenities, and promotes a variety of attainable housing opportunities that strengthen the City’s
vitality.

PURPOSE:
City Council will consider a request to recommend approval to the Arizona Department of Liquor License and
Control of an application for a Series 12 (Restaurant) Liquor License submitted by Andrea Lewkowitz for the
sale of alcohol at Coldwater Springs Golf Club located at 100 North Clubhouse Drive in Avondale and
authorize the City Clerk to execute the necessary documents. The Council will take appropriate action.
BACKGROUND:
Issuance of a Series 12 (Restaurant) liquor license is required to allow alcohol sales on the premises. Series
12 restaurant liquor licenses are exempt from the state-mandated 300-foot separation requirement from
churches, schools, or fenced school recreational areas.
Coldwater Springs Golf Club is an existing establishment located at 100 North Clubhouse Drive in Avondale.
The City Council recommended approval of a Series 12 restaurant liquor license at the establishment on
January 22, 2019; however, the business is reapplying for a new license due to a change in ownership.
Previous Ownership: Gibson Golf Management LLC
New Ownership: Coldwater Golf Park LLC
DISCUSSION:
As required by state law and city ordinance, the application was posted for the required period of time. The
Police, Fire & Medical, Development Services and Finance Departments have reviewed the application and
are recommending approval.

Page 25 of 30

BUDGET IMPACT:
The liquor license fee in the amount of $250 has been paid in full.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff are recommending that City Council recommend approval to the Arizona Department of Liquor License
and Control of an application for a Series 12 (Restaurant) submitted by Andrea Lewkowitz for the sale of
alcohol at Coldwater Springs Golf Club located at 100 North Clubhouse Drive in Avondale and authorize the
City Clerk to execute the necessary documents.
Contact person for document distribution: Chris Pierson

Page 26 of 30

***AMENDMENT | JOB #408325***

COLDWATER SPRINGS GOLF CLUB
100 N CLUBHOUSE DRIVE
AVONDALE, AZ 85323
4,900 SF

= areas not included

ENTRANCE/EXIT

LIQUOR STORAGE

LIQUOR STORAGE
ENTRANCE/
EXIT

PATIO

DINING

Page 27 of 30

LICENSE REVIEW FORM
Type of License
Applicant’s Name
Business Name
Business Address
Department Comments

Police Department

Fire Department

Development Services

Finance Department

Approved

Denied

______________________

______________________

E-Signature

Title

______________________

______________________

Name

Date

This license is scheduled for the City Council Meeting on: ______________________
Please

form

: ______________________

Page 28 of 30

LICENSE REVIEW FORM
Type of License
Applicant’s Name
Business Name
Business Address
Department Comments

Police Department

Fire Department

Development Services

Finance Department

Approved

Denied

______________________

______________________

E-Signature

Title

______________________

______________________

Name

Date

This license is scheduled for the City Council Meeting on: ______________________
Please

form

: ______________________

Page 29 of 30

LICENSE REVIEW FORM
Type of License
Applicant’s Name
Business Name
Business Address
Department Comments

Police Department

Fire Department

Development Services

Finance Department

Approved

Denied

______________________

______________________

E-Signature

Title

______________________

______________________

Name

Date

This license is scheduled for the City Council Meeting on: ______________________
Please

form

: ______________________

Page 30 of 30

LICENSE REVIEW FORM
Type of License
Applicant’s Name
Business Name
Business Address
Department Comments

Police Department

Fire Department

Development Services

Finance Department

Approved

Denied

______________________

______________________

E-Signature

Title

______________________

______________________

Name

Date

This license is scheduled for the City Council Meeting on: ______________________
Please

form

: ______________________

Provenance

Where this record came from. Every source is listed, permanently.

  • Agenda Watch · Sep 22, 2026

Permanent ID DKT-2026-001464 — this record is never deleted.

Record history

Every change to this record, logged as it happened.

  • Sep 22, 2026 Filed on the Docket
  • Sep 22, 2026 Full document archived — public record

← The full Docket · every meeting, vote, and action on the permanent record · also in the National Record Index.