On the agenda: Grass Valley City of Grass Valley City Council Meeting - Jun 08, 2021 — automated license plate (Oct 11)

GRASS VALLEY
City Council Regular Meeting, Capital Improvements Authority and
Redevelopment "Successor Agency"
Tuesday, June 08, 2021 at 7:00 PM
Council Chambers, Grass Valley City Hall | 125 East Main Street, Grass Valley, California
Telephone: (530) 274-4310 – Fax: (530) 274-4399
E-Mail: [email protected]
Web Site: www.cityofgrassvalley.com

AGENDA
Any person with a disability who requires accommodations to participate in this meeting
should telephone the City Clerk’s office at (530)274-4390, at least 48 hours prior to the
meeting to make a request for a disability related modification or accommodation.
VIRTUAL MEETING NOTICE
In response to Governor Newsom's Executive Order N-29-20 and Resolution 2020-09 Declaring
the Existence of a Local Emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic, public participation in
the City of Grass Valley City Council and other public meetings shall be electronic only, and
without a physical location for public participation, until further notice in compliance with
California state guidelines on social distancing. City Council welcomes you to attend the
meetings electronically, which are scheduled at 7:00 p.m. on the 2nd and 4th Tuesdays of
each month. Your interest is encouraged and appreciated.
This meeting is being broadcast “live” on Comcast Channel 17 by Nevada County Media, on
the internet at www.cityofgrassvalley.com, or on the City of Grass Valley YouTube channel at
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdAaL-uwdN8iTz8bI7SCuPQ. Indexed archives of
meetings are available via this link as well.
Members of the public are encouraged to submit public comments via voicemail at (530) 2744390 and email to [email protected]. Comments will be reviewed and distributed
before the meeting if received by 5pm. Comments received after that will be addressed during
the item and/or at the end of the meeting. Council will have the option to modify their action
on items based on comments received. Action may be taken on any agenda item.
Agenda materials, staff reports, and background information related to regular agenda items
are available on the City of Grass Valley website: www.cityofgrassvalley.com. Materials
related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda
packet will be made available on the City of Grass Valley website at
www.cityofgrassvalley.com subject to City staff’s ability to post the documents before the
meeting.
If you do not have the means to participate in meetings electronically, contact the City
at (530) 274-4390 and staff will be happy to identify alternative means for you to
participate.

Page 1

CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
AGENDA APPROVAL - The City Council reserves the right to hear items in a different order
to accomplish business in the most efficient manner.
REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION
INTRODUCTIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
PUBLIC COMMENT - Members of the public are encouraged to submit public comments via
voicemail at (530) 274-4390 and email to [email protected]. Comments will be
reviewed and distributed before the meeting if received by 5pm. Comments received after
that will be addressed during the item and/or at the end of the meeting. Council will have
the option to modify their action on items based on comments received. Action may be
taken on any agenda item.
CONSENT ITEMS - All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are to be considered
routine by the City Council and/or Grass Valley Redevelopment Agency and will be enacted
by one motion in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion of these items
unless, before the City Council and/or Grass Valley Redevelopment Agency votes on the
motion to adopt, members of the Council and/or Agency, staff or the public request
specific items to be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion and action
(roll call vote).
1. Approval of the Regular Meeting Minutes of May 25, 2021.
RECOMMENDATION: Council approve minutes as submitted.
2. Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2021-22
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution 2021-18 establishing the Appropriations limit
for the City of Grass Valley for the Fiscal Year 2021-22.
3. Annual Approval of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) Adjustment to the Special
Emergency Medical and Fire Response Tax.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council 1) Approve a rate increase to the Special
Emergency Medical and Fire Response Tax of 1.4% based on the December 2020 CPI.
2) Adopt Resolution 2021-16 requesting that the Nevada County Auditor place the
adjusted special tax on the FY 21/22 property tax rolls.
4. GVTIF Program, Nexus Study and Update – Award Contract
RECOMMENDATION: That Council 1) authorize the Assistant City Engineer to execute
a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with GHD, in the amount of $35,000 to
update Grass Valley Traffic Impact Fee Program 2) authorize the Assistant City
Engineer to approve contract change orders for up to 10% of the contract amount
5. 2021/22 Capital Improvement Program – RMRA Budget
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt a Resolution to include Road Maintenance
and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) funding in the Fiscal Year 2021/22 budget and
specifying a list of projects to be funded with RMRA funds.
City of Grass Valley, CA

AGENDA

June 08, 2021Page 2

ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION OR SEPARATE ACTION AND /
OR ANY ADDED AGENDA ITEMS
REORGANIZATION RELATED ITEMS
PUBLIC HEARING
6. Collection of delinquent sewer and/or water accounts on the Nevada County tax roll
RECOMMENDATION: After holding a public hearing, adopt Resolution 2021- 19
requesting that the County of Nevada levy and collect delinquent water and sewer
service charges on the tax roll.
7. Adopt five Resolutions of Intention to Order Improvements for Landscaping and
Lighting Districts (LLD) – Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2021-22 and Benefit
Assessments Districts (A.D.) – Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2021-22 and set
public hearing on June 22, 2021.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt five Resolutions of Intention for Commercial LLD #1988-1,
Residential LLD #1988-2, Morgan Ranch Unit 7 A.D. #2003-1, Morgan Ranch West A.D.
#2010-1 and Ridge Meadows A.D. and set public hearing on June 22, 2021. The five
Resolutions related to the Commercial and Residential Landscaping and Lighting
Districts, the Morgan Ranch-Unit 7 Benefit Assessment District, the Morgan Ranch
West Benefit Assessment District and Ridge Meadows Benefit Assessment District are
as follows: 1)
Resolution of Intention No. 2021-21 to Order Improvements
Pursuant to The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 – Assessment District No. 19881, Commercial Landscaping and Lighting District. 2) Resolution of Intention No. 202122 to Order Improvements Pursuant to The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 –
Assessment District No. 1988-2, Residential Landscaping and Lighting
District. 3) Resolution of Intention No. 2021-23 to Order Improvements Pursuant to
The Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 (Sections 54703 and following, California
Government Code; hereafter the “1982 Act”) – Morgan Ranch-Unit 7 Benefit
Assessment District No. 2003-1. 4) Resolution of Intention No. 2021-24 to Order
Improvements Pursuant to The Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 (Sections 54703 and
following, California Government Code; hereafter the “1982 Act”) – Morgan Ranch
West Benefit Assessment District No. 2010-1. 5) Resolution of Intention No. 2021-25
to Order Improvements Pursuant to The Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 (Sections
54703 and following, California Government Code; hereafter the “1982 Act”) – Ridge
Meadows Benefit Assessment District No. 2016-1.
8. Public Hearing to review and consider adopting the Proposed Budget for the City of
Grass Valley and the Successor Agency for Fiscal Year 2021-22.
RECOMMENDATION: After considering public testimony, adopt Resolution No. 2021-20
approving the Proposed Budget for the City of Grass Valley and the Successor Agency
for fiscal year 2021-22. A 4/5s vote of the Council is required for adoption of the
budget.
ADMINISTRATIVE
9. Grass Valley Police Department’s operation of automated license plate recognition
(ALPR or LPR) systems and data sharing agreement through Vigilant/Motorola.
RECOMMENDATION: Informational
City of Grass Valley, CA

AGENDA

June 08, 2021Page 3

10. Water Conservation
RECOMMENDATION: That Council review and provide any comments on the draft
resolution implementing Water Conservation Requirements.
BRIEF REPORTS BY COUNCIL MEMBERS
ADJOURN
POSTING NOTICE
This is to certify that the above notice of a Closed meeting of The City Council, scheduled
for Tuesday, June 8th 2021 at 7:00 PM was posted at city hall, easily accessible to the
public, as of 6:00 p.m. Friday, June 4th, 2021.
________________________
Taylor Day, Deputy City Clerk

City of Grass Valley, CA

AGENDA

June 08, 2021Page 4

Item # 1.

GRASS VALLEY
City Council Regular Meeting, Capital Improvements Authority and
Redevelopment "Successor Agency"
Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 7:00 PM
Council Chambers, Grass Valley City Hall | 125 East Main Street, Grass Valley, California
Telephone: (530) 274-4310 – Fax: (530) 274-4399
E-Mail: [email protected]
Web Site: www.cityofgrassvalley.com

MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
Called to order at 7:04 by Mayor Aguilar
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Aguilar
ROLL CALL
PRESENT
Mayor Ben Aguilar
Vice Mayor Jan Arbuckle
Council Member Bob Branstrom
Council Member Hilary Hodge
Council Member Tom Ivy
AGENDA APPROVAL Motion for agenda approval made by Vice Mayor Arbuckle, Seconded by Council Member
Branstrom.
Voting Yea: Mayor Aguilar, Vice Mayor Arbuckle, Council Member Branstrom, Council Member
Hodge, Council Member Ivy
REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION
Nothing to report out of Closed Session.
INTRODUCTIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
1. American Legion Auxiliary Veteran's Poppy Days - May 28th & 29th
Mayor Aguilar presented this proclamation to the Veterans Allegiance.
PUBLIC COMMENT Public Comments are attached.

Page 5

Item # 1.

CONSENT ITEMS Motion to approve consent items made by Council Member Hodge, Seconded by Vice Mayor
Arbuckle.
Voting Yea: Mayor Aguilar, Vice Mayor Arbuckle, Council Member Branstrom, Council Member
Hodge, Council Member Ivy
2. Approval of the Regular Meeting Minutes of May 11, 2021
RECOMMENDATION: Council approve minutes as submitted.
3. Local Emergency Proclamation (COVID-19)
RECOMMENDATION: Continuance of Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) proclamation
declaring a Local State of Emergency.
4. Extension of an agreement between the City and Nevada County for the County to
provide building inspection, plan review, and other related building services for the
City
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to sign the attached Agreement between
the City of Grass Valley and Nevada County for the provision of building services.
5. Out of State Travel - Motorola System Demo and Training
RECOMMENDATION: Approve Out of State Travel.
6. Condon Park Parking Improvements Project – Authorization to Bid
RECOMMENDATION: That Council 1) approve the findings that the project is
categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and 2) authorize the advertisement for bids.
7. Generator Equipment Standardization and Sole Source Procurement Authorization
RECOMMENDATION: That Council: 1) adopt Resolution 2021-13: a) declaring the work
associated with the replacement of the generator and associated equipment at Fire
Station 2 provided by Generac and performed by Energy Systems Power Systems an
Emergency; b) approving the findings that the project is categorically exempt from
the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and c) authorizing
the procurement of a construction contract without a competitive bid process due
to the urgent necessity of the work for the preservation of life, health and property
in accordance with City Charter Article XIII and Municipal Code Section 3.08.140 Sole
Source Procurement (requires 4/5 roll call vote); 2) authorize the Fire Chief to
execute the construction contract, subject to legal review and permitting, for the
purchase and installation of a Generac generator and automatic transfer switch at
Grass Valley Fire Station 2 for no more than $157,500.00; and 3) authorize the Fire
Chief to approve construction change orders for up to 10% of the total contract
amount.
8. Certification of promotional list for Battalion Chief, Captain, and Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That Council 1) certify the newly developed promotional
eligibility list for Battalion Chief, Captain, and Engineer effective May 26, 2021.

City of Grass Valley, CA

MINUTES

May 25, 2021Page 6

Item # 1.

9. Job Description Approval - Superintendent II
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve a revised job description for the position
of Superintendent II and 2) authorize the City Manager to approve any budget
amendments and transfers to complete the subject action.
10. Request to amend Per Capita Grant Program grant contract to increase fund
allocation from $177,952 to $252,952.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No.
2021–15, allowing for the allocation of an additional $75,000 to the City’s Per Capita
Grand fund.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION OR SEPARATE ACTION AND /
OR ANY ADDED AGENDA ITEMS
None.
PUBLIC HEARING
ADMINISTRATIVE
11. Historical Commission Recommendation of Memorial Park Centennial Courtyard
Project and Alternatives
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider Staff’s and the Historical
Commission recommendations and alternatives, which include the following actions:
1.)Determine the project Categorically Exempt as the appropriate level of
environmental review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and Guidelines; 2.) Consider the Memorial Park Centennial Courtyard Project
and Alternatives outlined in this Staff Report; and, 3.) Approve a selected option
based upon Staff’s and the Historical Commission presentations at the May 25, 2021,
City Council meeting.
Motion made to 1) Determine the project Categorically Exempt as the appropriate
level of environmental review in accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) and Guidelines; 2) Consider the Memorial Park Centennial
Courtyard Project and Alternatives outlined in this Staff Report; and, 3) Approve a
selected option based upon Staff’s and the Historical Commission presentations at
the May 25, 2021, City Council meeting by Vice Mayor Arbuckle, Seconded by Council
Member Hodge.
Voting Yea: Mayor Aguilar, Vice Mayor Arbuckle, Council Member Branstrom, Council
Member Hodge, Council Member Ivy
12. Marketing Consultant
RECOMMENDATION: That Council authorize the City Manager to execute a
Professional Services Agreement with Banner Mountain Media
Motion to authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement
with Banner Mountain Media made by Vice Mayor Arbuckle, Seconded by Council
Member Hodge.
Voting Yea: Mayor Aguilar, Vice Mayor Arbuckle, Council Member Branstrom, Council
Member Hodge, Council Member Ivy
City of Grass Valley, CA

MINUTES

May 25, 2021Page 7

Item # 1.

13. FY 2021-22 Preliminary Budget Overview
RECOMMENDATION: (1) It is recommended that the City Council approve by Motion
the FY 2021-22 Preliminary Budget and provide further direction to staff as it relates
to the preparation of the FY 2021-22 Final Budget. (2) Set June 8, 2021 as the date
for the public hearing for the FY 2021-22 Final Budget.
Motion to approve the FY 2021-22 Preliminary Budget and provide further direction
to staff as it relates to the preparation of the FY 2021-22 Final Budget and to set
June 8, 2021 as the date for the public hearing for the FY 2021-22 Final Budget by
Council Member Hodge, Seconded by Vice Mayor Arbuckle.
Voting Yea: Mayor Aguilar, Vice Mayor Arbuckle, Council Member Hodge, Council
Member Ivy, Council Member Branstrom.
BRIEF REPORTS BY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Councilmember Ivy - attended an Organic Waste Subcommittee Meeting and attended his
first yard waste drop off the past weekend. Councilmember Hodge is urging everyone to
keep up shopping local. Councilmember Branstrom attended league of cities meetings and is
happy that what is happening outside of city limits and how other communities are
struggling and how the City of Grass Valley is looking good on its finances. Vice Mayor
Arbuckle attended league of cities meetings, Nevada County law and fire council meeting,
NCTC Meeting, Master Plan on Aging meeting, and JEDI meeting. Mayor Aguilar along with
City Manager presented the latest City Project Priorities, public safety, and recreation to
the board of supervisors and he had a Lafco Budget meeting, and I is looking forward to the
4th of July fireworks since the city will be putting them on like they did last year.
ADJOURN
Meeting adjourned by Mayor Aguilar at 8:43 PM

_________________________________

_____________________________________

Ben Aguilar, Mayor

Taylor Day, Deputy City Clerk

City of Grass Valley, CA

MINUTES

May 25, 2021Page 8

Mail - Public Comments - Outlook

5n512021

Item # 1.

Voice Mail (3 minutes and 11 seconds)
WIRELESS CALLER
Mon 5/24/2021 2:11 PM

To: Public Comments < [email protected]

>

$ t attachments (1 MB)
audio.mp3;

My name is Tony Lori, a one, three seven eight four Greenhorn road in Grass Valley, California. The title from
my comment today he is hazards of gold mining, especially where people live. There is more at stake here
than what's contained in the results of the E. I are deciding the fate of the community on this document.
Alone is an incomplete assessment of the potential for impacts that will alter the quality of life here forever.
The devaluation of hundreds of properties cannot be overlooked. lt is not mere speculation to state. We will
suffer significant reduction in the large savings of our homes. That could be a total loss should our water
source be illuminated by the twenty four seven pump out of our aquifers. All this in a time of drought and
dire need for every bit of our water. Another concern not covered by the E I R is the impact on our area as an
environmental Oasis for the enjoyment of outdoors and nature residents and tourists alike. Revel in the
beauty of our Trails, lakes, wildlife, rivers, clean air and quiet environment of full scale twenty four seven
mining operation with endless truck and equipment emissions will cause irreparable damage to all of that.
Our town will transformed from a beautiful foothills. Get away to a dry industrial mining wasteland. Much
more can be said on the subject of extenuating impacts, but let's move on to some final thoughts. Either the
CEO of Rice goals has never actually operated in mind and lacks the necessary experience, or he is purposely
misrepresenting the scope of their project proposal. Possibly the answer is both, being that he is currently
under trial for toxic spills in Canada. He obviously has some experience in operation and knows the potential
for failure. He has publicly repeated the phrase is there will be no impacts and we have designed it to have no
impacts. ls this the type of company officials without accounting lots running a gold mine in the middle of our
community based on factual evidence? Deep bedrock gold mining is absolutely known cause environmental
impact disasters. Facts are written in gold mining history here. What is your honest reply? lf I came to your
house and said I would like to open a mind in your vicinity, there's a chance I may suck your well dry and
cause a terrible problem with the environment. But I will be providing some jobs and hauling a lot of gold out
of the ground. Are you willing to take that chance? What's in it for you and our community? Do you need my
new job? Will you any profit from the gold? How many jobs are worth the loss of your well being and quality
of life? l'll close this comment with one example of the real world reach of mining impacts. According to the
mineral rights and existing tunnel Maps, the area of mining in one of the directions travels all the way under
the Brunswick Basin. As I was sitting in the dentist chair at Doctor Evans Brunswick East Office, it occurred to
me that I did not want to risk having that delicate procedure done while blasting and drilling for gold was
happening directly below. Please oppose this egregious eighty year proposal to devolve are beautiful foothills
back to a destructive time of greed and gold mining.
You received a voice mail from WIRELESS CALLER.

Thank you for using Transcription! lf you don't see a transcript above, it's because the audio quality was not clear
enough to transcribe.
Set Up Voice-[4ej-[
Page 9

Mall - Public Comments - Outlook

s,ti2il2021

Item # 1.

Public Comment
Laura Gerhart
Mon 5/24/2021 1 1:25 aM

To: Public Comments < [email protected]

>

Since the Council is not yet open to the public, I request that my letter be read at the upcoming Grass
Valley Council meeting so it can be part of the public record. Thank you.

sl24l202L
TO: Grass Valley City Council
FR: Laura Gerhafi Grass Valley property owner, 11010 Brunswick Drive, Grass Valley, 95945
RE: Reopening of the ldaho Maryland Mine

As a homeowner and long-time resident I am writing today with deep concern about what I consider to be Rise
Gold/Grass Valleyt efforts to minimize the effects their industrial mining operation will have on the quiet rural
areas around the proposed mine and dump sites. Rise Gold/Grass Valley is emphasizing that mining will be done
500-1000 feet underground and that the blasting and crushing will be "unnoticeable and undetectable."
Even if this was true, which I do not believe and which is not what the evidence points to in other "modern"

mining efforts, their willingness to downplay the underground operations and overlook the above ground impacts
point to the company's underlying aim to promote their agenda above honestly considering the effect the mine
willhave on our community.
I am not well-educated in the particulars of the modern mining industry; however, it as easy to imagine the noise
and dust that will be created by mechanisms aimed at getting the rock to the surface from 500-100O ft. below. ln
addition, the line of large truck idling while waiting to have the ore loaded and the sound of all that material
landing in a truck bed, over and over for 16 hours a day sounds impactful.

Then, there is the transportation of it out onto Brunswick Road with a truck every 10 minutes or so gearing up
and down to get out of the compound, at Greenhorn 4 way stop and while turning onto Whispering Pines. Not to
mention the truck passing back and forth up and down Bennett Road all day.

lf thatt not enough, the operation includes the sound of morning to night heavy equipment compacting,
excavating, and grading fill piles up to 7 stories tal!. That's 70 feet! That's higher than most buildings in our lovely
county. Just the beep, beep, beep of the movers constantly backing up will be excruciating for miles around let
alone the noise of the work being done.
The whole thing sounds like a noiry intrusive, bad idea. lt sounds incredibly impactful. I urge you not to dismiss or

diminish the concerns of residents about the reopening of the ldaho Maryland Mine. We make up the county. We
purchase goods and services, we participate in community life with work and volunteer activities, we pay taxes,
and there are a great many of us who will be affected.
Please do not bring this disrupfve proposition to our area in exchange for less than 300 new jobs and a relatively

small amount of tax revenue that can likely be acquired in a way more conducive to the health and quality of life
that we who live here cherish.

Respectfully,
Laura Gerhart

Page 10

5t25t2021

Mail - Public Comrnonts - Outlook

Item # 1.

Rise Gold Mining project - Disaster in the making

jeffmbellucci
Mon 5/24/2021 7:39 PM

To: Pu blic Comments < public@cityofgraswal ley.com >

Dear Nevada City Council Members,

Gold mining in California has been romanticized (we even have a football team named after the influx
of settlers that came here in 1849). However, now that l've actually lived in Grass Valley for a number
of years, !'ve learned a more complete history, including why most mines were closed in the first place

When I walk on localtrails, I see all the signs for areas off limits because of high Ievels of poisons, like
arsenic and mercury. There are superfund sites left behind in this area that will likely never be fully
cleaned up. Despite bringing many people to the area in the past, mining did a huge amount of
irreparable environmental harm.

lf Rise Gold is successful in re-opening the Idaho-Maryland mine, how many wells wil! run dry? How
many roads will be destroyed by the thousands of dump trucks they weren't designed to carry? Where
will all that toxic runoff that they pump out of their tunnels and shafts end up? How much wil! our
property values be negatively impacted by the constant noise and truck traffic?
No one can adequately or definitively answer those questions which makes their plan a total nonstarter. I never agreed to heavy industry about a mile from my door when I bought my home in Cedar
Ridge. The fact that myself and other residents have no say in this matter is unconscionable. This
should be a ballot measure, but it's not. Since normal democracy has failed us, you have a duty to
stop this mine from proceeding however you can.
! am sure you are already aware of how much damage was done to the landscape and environment of

this area by past gold mining operations, which is all the more reason to be against this project by a
Canadian gold company trying to profit from our area without any regard for the inevitable
consequences.
lf things go sideways with the operation at any point, Rise Gold willjust declare bankruptcy (as the
CEO Ben Mossman has with a p1gialJrmining-p4ieE[), and allthat burden will be on us. How willwe
afford that very real possibility? For a local example, just look to Nofth San Juan, where a mining
company took zero responsibility for dry wells and damage to the local aquifer. The ldaho-Maryland
Mine has the potential to affect 10 times as many wells or more. The fact that this is even being
considered is so incredibly short-sighted.
Gold mining had it's time and place in California, but now it's over. Slightly increased loca! income
and a couple hundred jobs (at best) is NOT worth destroying our collective quality of life and
environment. I can almost promise that whatever income the county could take in from the mine, it
will end up being saddled with multiples of that amount in cleanup and remediation after Rise says
goodbye and leaves town to trash somewhere else.
It is in your hands to prevent a potential environmental and economic catastrophe. Please make the
Page 11
only sensible decision and oppose this mine.
htpsJ/outlook.offce365.com/mail/lnboxfrdAAQkADcyZlg0ZDYylWlzN2EtNDRJNC04NWRhLTASOTAWk4MTA4MgAQAJOTohzlyzE2uhOmYTrzlB...

112

51125t2021

Mail - Public Comments - Outlook

Item # 1.

Sincerely,

Jeff Bellucci - Nevada County resident

Page 12
htps://outlook.office365.com/maiUinbox/id/AAQlcADcyZTg0ZDYyLWlzN2EtNDRjNC04NWRhLTASOTAyNJk4MTA4MgACINGTTo2BpE2UhOmYTrzlB...

A2

5t25t2021

Mail - Public Comments - Outlook

Item # 1.

Public Comment
audrey schwartz
Tue 5/25/2021 3:50 PM

To: Pu blic Comments < publ ic@cityofgraswal ley.com>

To City Council Members.

Today mark a year since George Floyd was murdered by Minneapolis police. Racism is still
rampant and Black People are still being murdered. What are you doing as a council to stop racial
violence and achieve racialjustice and racial equity in grass valley? Have you investigated Grass Valley
PD to see if any officers have complaints against them for racism and or excessive use of force? Have
you made sure that GVPD is up to date on implicit bias and cultural sensitivity training? Have you
researched to see if any of the GVPD is racist? Have you hired a Diversity Equity and lnclusion team for
the GVPD as well as for all city jobs including city council? Across the country cities have and are
working to implement alternatives to policing, what are you doing about that?
Have you set up any committees to work towards racialjustice and DEI? Are you vetting all city
employees and grass valley committees to make sure no more racists are on them, (as was the case for

at least one member of the Grass Valley historical committee)? Are you applying budget funds
towards organizations who are working to advance racialjustice in the community? What policies are
you implementing as City Council to address racism? What willyour legary be as city council
members? Right now, what stands out is that you sided with racists when you took down Black Lives
Matter signs from local store fronts. That is the same racism that murdered George FIoyd. What will
you do to change that?
Will you please put an item on the next agenda to address working to achieve racialjustice and
racial equity ln Grass Valley?
Stop white supremacy now
Black Lives Matter.

-Audrey Schwartz
Sent from my iPhone

Page 13

5nffi021

Mall - Publlc Commente - Outlook

Item # 1.

Public Comment GVDA
Marni Marshall
Iue 5/25/2021 4:34 PM
To: Public Comments < publ ic@cityofgraswal ley.com >

Good afternoon.

Thank for including our farmers market comment so last minute the last Council meeting.
For tonight:

Come downtown forthe Farmers Market on Mill Street Thursdays 4-7pm through to June 17th
The regular Thursday Market starts June 24th, whidl farmers will be a part d, and lhe time for Thursday Night Market is G9pm.
4th of July Parade applications arc ready at the Greabr Gnass Valley Chambe of Commerce.
Stay tuned to W.dmlowngE$Syalil,Cgm fur updates of 4th of July weekend downbum, parade, and fireworks.

MarniMarshall
Grass Valley Downtown Association

Executive Director
530-272-8315 office
530-798-9690 cell

Page 14

Mail - Public Comments - Outbok

5t2512021

Item # 1.

Voice Mail (3 minutes and 58 seconds)
WIRELESS CALLER
Tue 5/25/2021 4:08 PM

To: Pu bl ic Com ments < pu bl ic@cityofg raswa ley.com >
I

! 1 attachments (2 MB)
audio.mp3;

Yes hello this is Matthew Coulter Grass Valley. l'd like to comment on number 8 #11 #13 and also the closed

session dealing with the litigation against the city. I was going to say for the city that they should save their
money 'cause there's a lot more coming down the Pike so be ready for that. And as far as #13 that's field
AT&T Yard. I would like to comment on that being that I believe the animal shelter should be moved to that
location which is a little farther away from the shooting range and also the heinous smell of the sewage

treatment plant with dogs have 4000 the amount of receptors in their nose so I imagine that smell 4000 times
stronger that's and called for. That's actually torture and animal abuse. What's going on that shelter at this
point? #11 the basketball in new pickleball court. Designed for Memorial Park l'm adamantly against and will
fight tooth and nail. I can't believe that this is a presentation by the Historical Society or historical
Commission. l'm already listening to pick a ball from my bedroom with the windows closed. That's how loud it
is and they want to move it even closer. And basketball court even closer. My window is fifty feet from the
playground and these items make even more noise than the playground, and I don't think it's a good idea. I
don't think Memorial Park should be a Sports Complex. That's not what it was intended for. lt was intended as
a Memorial Park or they would have called 1T baseballfield or something else. Then Memorial Park. The
history does not dictate that is turned into a Sports Complex. Every square foot is just not what it was
intended for. I see other things getting attention in the park and the Veterans Area gets absolutely none. And
when it does get attention, they literally mow over the trash and turn it into mulch. So it takes me a couple
hours to pick it up instead of five minutes. 'cause the city will not pick up the trash. Number eight we were
promised with the tax hike. We were promised paramedics on the fire engines and we have never achieved
that goa! and l'm just wondering why we're being taxed for something that is not being provided. That's #8.
And then in the public comment section, I would like to say that l'm definitely adamantly against the ldaho
Maryland mine project that the city seems to be so behind, and also these developments that are going in
everywhere that are a keyhole. Developments with one way in one way out, no traffic improvements
specifically. Also Loma Rica ranch. I believe the Planning Commission and others squash the tunnel idea
because the safety aspect multiple citizens spoke on the pedestrian tunnel as a hazard and they are going to
go ahead with it. So just be prepared for the homeless to be completely living in there. You are making a
perfect environment for muggings, rapes, robberies, and almost to live in. lt is a nice fire shelter, though l'll
say that originally in the planet was supposed to be bridges going across Brunswick Road and or C drive, but
the developers said that was too expensive, so obviously this is a give me again to the developer that doesn't
care. Ann isn't aware of the communities needs. Again, public comments. Slow down speed racer's. You turn
this place into Roseville overnight. Thank you.
You received a voice mail from WIRELESS CALLER.

Thank you for using Transcription! lf you don't see a transcript above, it's because the audio quality was not clear
enough to transcribe.
Set Up_Yeice !!eil

Page 15

hilps://outlook.offce365.com/maiUinbox/WAAQkADcyZTgOZDYytWlzN2EtNDRjNC04NWRhLTASOTAyNik4MTA4MgAQAExlClGm6XSBgGv8Q4wfT

1n

5t25t2021

Mail - Public Comments - Outbok

Item # 1.

Page 16

5125t202'.1

Mail - Public CommentE - Outlook

Item # 1.

Item 13 on tonight's agenda
audrey schwartz
Tue 5/25/2021 8:01 PM

To: Pu blic Comments < publ ic@cityofgrassval ley.com >
To City Council,

Would you please request an audit of the GVPD in order to get a data analysis of the City of Grass
Valley's police response as a way to promote transparency and accountability in the Grass Valley
government?
The objectives of this audit would be to find out the characteristics of the GVPD's calls for service that

they respond to.
The characteristics of officer initiated stops in Grass Valley

How much time the officers spend responding to calls for service.
How many calls for service are related to mental health and houselessness.

And can the City improve the transparenry of GVPD calls.
The is audit is important in order to reimagine policing in Grass Valley.

Would City Council also please re allocate funds that police use to respond to mental health, domestic
violence, wellness checks, responses to calls on people who are unhoused, and all other nonviolent calls,
to fund a mobile response unit that is independent of police in order to not escalate or endanger
civilians.

Would you also please allocate funds towards a racialjustice committee as well as a Diversity, Equity and
lnclusion Committee?
Would you also please spend funds towards organizations who are actively working towards racial
justice as well as organizations actively helping Blach lndigenous, and People of Color in the community
Black lives matter.
Rest ln Peace George FLoyd.

-Audrey Schwartz
Sent from my iPhone

Page 17

Item # 2.

City of Grass Valley
City Council
Agenda Action Sheet

Council Meeting Date:

June 8, 2021

Date Prepared: June 4, 2021

Prepared by:

Andy Heath, Finance Director

Title:

Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2021-22

Agenda:

Consent

Recommended Motions:

Adopt Resolution 2021-18 establishing the Appropriations limit
for the City of Grass Valley for the Fiscal Year 2021-22.

DISCUSSION
Each year the City is required to adopt an appropriations limit by resolution. The limit is based on
the 1978-79 appropriations “base” adjusted each year by allowed factors. Under Proposition 111,
there are two options available for each of the major adjustment factors. For the price factor, the
City can elect to use the percent growth in State per capita personal income or the percent change
in assessed valuation in new non-residential construction. For the population factor, the City can
elect to use either the percent growth in County population or the percent growth in City
population.
For the population factor, the most favorable to the City is the percent growth in County population
of -0.30 percent. For the price factor, staff has used the percentage change in State per capita
income (5.73%) to calculate the limitation, resulting in a price factor of 1.0573.
The population and price factors are multiplied together for a combined factor of 1.0541. The
combined factor when applied to the FY 2020-21 limit of $24,020,613 determines the FY 202122 limit of $25,320,128.
Based on the City’s FY 2021-22 Proposed Budget, the City will be well under its spending limit.
COUNCIL GOALS / OBJECTIVES
Establishing the FY 2021-22 Appropriations Limit executes portions of the work tasks towards
achieving / maintaining the Strategic Plan goal to maintain a High-Performance Government and
Quality Service.

C:\windows\TEMP\tmpAEF6.tmp

Page 18

Agenda Item # _______

Item # 2.

City of Grass Valley
City Council
Agenda Action Sheet

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

REVIEWED BY:

____ City Manager

C:\windows\TEMP\tmpAEF6.tmp

Page 19

Agenda Item # _______

Item # 2.

RESOLUTION NO. 2021-18
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRASS
VALLEY ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE
CITY OF GRASS VALLEY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22
PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIII B OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION.
WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the California Constitution (Proposition 4) provides
for an annual appropriations limit for state and local governments beginning with the
1980-81 fiscal year, based on 1978-79 appropriations, as adjusted for the changes in
the cost of living or per capita personal income, population and other specified factors,
and
WHEREAS, implementing legislation which became effective January 1, 1981,
provides that each year the governing body of each local jurisdiction shall, by
resolution, establish its appropriations limit for the year pursuant to Article XIII B at a
regularly scheduled meeting or noticed special meeting; and
WHEREAS, documentation used in determination of the Fiscal Year 2020-21
appropriations limit has been available to the public prior to City Council’s determination
in this matter as required by Government Code Section 7910.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Grass
Valley, as follows:
1.

That the foregoing statements are true and correct.

2.

That the appropriations limit for the City of Grass Valley for the Fiscal
Year 2021-22 pursuant to Article XIII B of the California Constitution is
established at $25,320,128.

3.

That the factors used to calculate the Fiscal Year 2021-22 appropriations
limit are the percentage change in the population of Nevada County of
0.9970 times the percentage change in California per capita income of
1.0573 for a total factor of 1.0541 applied to the Fiscal Year 2020-21
established limit of $24,020,613.

ADOPTED as a Resolution of the Council of the City of Grass Valley at a
meeting thereof held on the 8th day of June, 2021, by the following vote:
AYES:

Council Member

NOES:

Council Member

ABSENT:

Council Member

ABSTAINING: Council Member

Page 20

Item # 2.

____________________________________
Ben Aguilar, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Taylor Day, Deputy City Clerk
APPROVAL AS TO FORM:
____________________________________
Michael Colantuono, City Attorney

Page 21

Item # 2.

CITY OF GRASS VALLEY
HISTORY OF APPROPRIATIONS LIMITS
FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BUDGET

1978-79 BASE:
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS
LESS NON-PROCEEDS OF TAXES

1979-80
1980-81
1981-82
1982-83
1983-84
1984-85
1985-86
1986-87
1987-88
1988-89
1989-90
1990-91
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
1996-97
1997-98
1998-99
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22

1978-79 APPROPRIATIONS BASE

$5,436,250
3,260,107
--------------------------2,176,143

LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
IIMiT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMlT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT
LIMIT

NOT APPLICABLE
2,728,883
3,149,749
3,525,514
3,710,562
4,153,974
4,405,705
4,602,640
4,901,812
5,094,453
5,532,576
6,112,580
6,631,725
6,839,298
7,173,056
7,352,382
7,934,247
8,405,264
8,797,587
9,272,657
10,045,524
10,634,192
12,636,442
12,670,584
12,994,386
13,576,534
15,143,267
15,685,396
16,392,807
17,320,640
17,329,300
16,805,955
17,301,791
17,815,654
18,720,689
18,686,992
19,486,795
20,546,877
21,352,315
22,257,653
23,087,863
24,020,613
25,320,128

THE 2021-22 LIMIT IS CALCULATED BY MULTIPYING THE POPULATION FACTOR FOR
NEVADA COUNTY OF -0.30 PERGENT TIMES THE PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN CALIFORNIA
PER CAPITA INCOME OF 1.0573 FOR A TOTAL CALCULATION FACTOR OF 1.0541.
THE 2020-21 LIMIT TIMES THE CALCULATION FACTOR DETERMINES THE 2021-22 LIMIT.
APPROPRIATIONS IN THE 2021-22 PROPOSED BUDGET THAT ARE SUBJECT TO THE
LIMITATION HAVE BEEN CALCULATED TO BE:
$18,412,528

Page 22

~
~s
Q

~~
~~i
IfII

~

Item # 2.

Z
~t
~i

f~EPAI?TMENT C7~
°'~~, FpR~` P

'

Gavin Newsom . ~oVernor
.~tC7~F'.. ~[:f~l~t7~ E ~gQ1T1 1 ~ ~J~ r SC:1C(C'~311P.1"tfC} {..f~rq)~ ~ 1~t~~V
p ■ 4W~14V,C~iJf.CQ.~OY

flFF'C~ C?F T1~E ptRECTC?R

May 2021
Dear Fiscal Officer:
Subject: Price Factor and Population Information
Appropriations Limit
California Revenue and Taxation Code section 2227 requires the Department of Finance (Finance)
to transmit an estimate of the percentage change in population to local governments. Each local
jurisdiction must use their percentage change in population factor for January 1, 2021, in
conjunction with a change in the cost of living, or price factor, to calculate their appropriations
limit for fiscal year 2021-22. Attachment A provides the change in California's per capita personal
income and an example for utilizing the price factor and population percentage change factor
to calculate the 2021-22 appropriations limit. Attachment B provides the city and unincorporated
county population percentage change. Attachment C provides the population percentage
change for counties and their summed incorporated areas. The population percentage change
data excludes federal and state institutionalized populations and military populations.
Population Percent Change for Special Districts
Some special districts must estabPish an annual appropriations limit. California Revenue and
Taxation Code section 2228 provides additional information regarding the appropriations limit.
Article XIII B, section 9(Cj of the California Constitution exempts certain special districts from the
appropriations limit calculation mandate. The code section and the California Constitution can
be accessed at the following website: http://le_ info.legislature.ca.govlfaces/codes.xhtml.
Special districts required by law to calculate their appropriations limit must present the calculation
as part of their annual audit. Any questions special districts have on this requirement should be
directed to their county, district legal counsel, or the law itself. No state agency reviews the local
appropriations limits.
Population Certification
The population certification program applies only to cities and counties. California Revenue and
Taxation Code section 11005.6 mandates Finance to automatically certify any population
estimate that exceeds the current certified population with the State Controller's Office. Finance
will certify the higher estimate to the State Controller by June 1, 2421.
Please Note: The prior year's city population estimates may be revised. The per capita personal
income change is based on historical data. Given the stay-at-home orders due to COVID-19,
growth in the coming years may be substantially lower than recent trends.
If you have any questions regarding this data, please contact the Demographic Research Unit at
(916) 323-4086.
KEELY MARTIN BOSLER
Director
By:
/sJ Erika Li
Erika Li
Chief Deputy Director
Attachment

Page 23

Item # 2.

May 2021
Attachment A

A.

Price Factor: Article XIIP B specifies that local jurisdictions select their cost of living
factor to compute their appropriation limit by a vote of their governing body. The
cost of living factor provided here is per capita personal income. ff the percentage
change in per capita personal income is selected, the percentage change to be
used in setting the fiscal year 2021-22 appropriation limit is:
Per Capita Personal Income
Fiscal Year
(FY)

Percentage change
over prior year

2021-22

5.73

Following is an example using sample population change and the change in
California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a 2021-22
appropriation limit.
2021-22:
Per Capita Cost of Living Change = 5.73 percent
Population Change = -0.46 percent

Per Capita Cost of Living converted to a ratio:

5.73 + 100 = 1.0573
100

Population converted to a ratio:

-0.46 + 100 = 0.9954
100

Calculation of factor for FY 2021-22:

1.0573 x 0.9954 = 1.0524

Page 24

E-1: City/CountyJState Population Estimates with Annual Percent Change
January 1, 2020 and 2Q21
JURISDICTION

Napa
American Canyon

Total Population
1/1/20
1/1/21

139,000

137,637

Percent
Change

JURISDICTION

Total Population
1/1/20
1/1/21

Balance of County

127,510

127,787

Item # 2.

Percent
Change
0.2

20,901

20,802

-1.0
-0.5

Placer

399,015

404,994

1.5

Calistoga

5,352

5,340

-0.2

Auburn

14,372

14,433

0.4

Napa

79,016
6,094

79,397

0.5
-0.4

Colfax

2,154

Lincoln

2,172
49,624

0.8

48,584

2,713
24,924

2,642

-2.6
-6.2

Loomis
Rocklin

6,787

6,808

0.3

69,702

70,469

Roseville

143,493

146,875

1.1
2.4

Balance of County

113,923

114,613

0.6
-0.8

St Helena
Yountville
Balance of County

6,070
23,386

2.1

Nevada

97,775

97,466

-0.3

Grass Vglley

12,806

12,758

-0.4

Nevgda City

3,101

3,0&1

-0.6

Plumas

18,256

18,116

Truckee

16,108

16,213

0.7

Porfola

1,947

1,928

-1.0

Balance of County

65,760

65,414

-0.5

Balance of County

16,309

16,188

-0.7

Riverside

2,440,719

2,454,453

0.6

Orange

3,180,491

3,153,764

-0.8

Aliso Viejo

50,351

49,813

-1.1

Banning

31,057

32,233

3.8

Anaheim.

357,059

353,468

-1.0

Beaumont

51,731

52,686

1.8

Brea

45,498

45,137

-0.8

Blythe

19,530

18,556

-5.0

Buena Park

82,336
113,667

81,626

-0.9

Calimesa

9,522

10,236

7.5

112,780

Canyon Lake

0.1

48,531

Cathedral City

11,018
53,494

11,025

49,055

-0.8
-1.1

53,973

0.9

33,466

33,189

-0.8

Coachella

47,583

0.5

Fountain Valley

55,419

-0.8

142,070

-1.9

Corona
Desert Hot Springs

168,332

Fullerton

54,953
139,431

47,825
169,454

30,036

30,086

0.2

Garden Grove

173,457

-0.6

Eastvale

66,535

67,626

1.6

Huntington Beach

Costa Mesa
Cypress
Dana Point

0.7

19$,725

172,476
196,874

-0.9

Hemet

84,391

84,525

0.2

Irvine

277,988

271,564

-2.3

Indian Wells

5,371

5,428

1.1

Laguna Beach

22,690
31,397

22,495

-0.9

Indio

90,804

31,073

-1.0

Jurupa Valley

107,000

91,621
108,097

0.9

Laguna Hills
Laguna Niguel

64,559

65,168

0.9

Lake Elsinore

63,591

64,7&2

1.8

Laguna Woods

16,209
63,471

16,036

-1.1

La Quinta

0.8

-1.0

99,686

2.7

84,556
15,607

84,538
15,442

Q.0

Menifee
Moreno Valley

40,906
97,094

41,247

62,808

Murrieta

208,791
114,541

209,426
115,172

0.3

-1.1

11,602

11,538

-0.6

Norco

27,611

26,107

-5.4

Mission Viejo
Newport Beach

95,130

94,119

-1.1

Palm Desert

53,828

53,892

0.1

86,415

85,865

-0.6

Palm Springs

47,509

47,754

0.5

Orange

139,504

-1.5

Perris

0.5

51,569

-0.8

Rancho Mirage

78,575
18,611

78,977

Placentia
Rancho Santa
Margarita
San Clemente
San Juan
Capistrano
Santa Ana
Seal Beach

137,366
51,173

18,799

Riverside
San Jacinto

328,766

324,302

1.0
-1.4

50,207

0.2

La Habra
Lake Forest
La Palma
Los Alamitos

1.0

0.6

48,708

48,183

-1.1

64,538

64,065

-0.7

Temecula

112,512

51,269
112,771

36,081

35,801

-0.8

Wildomar

36,963

37,013

0.1

331,304

331,369

0.0

Balance of County

384,810

389,905

1.3

24,711

24,443

-1.1

Stanton

39,150

39,573

1.1

1,561,014

0.5

80,511

80,009

-0.6

87,788

Villa Park

5,759

-1.1

87,811
178,124

0.0
1.2

Westminster

5,821
91,931

Sacramento
Citrus Heights
Elk Grove

1,553,157

Tustin

Folsom

82,303

68,426

91,466
67,846

-0.5

Yorba Linda

-0.8

Galt

1.5
0.4Page 25

176,036
81,106
26,006

26,116

2.1

Item # 3.

City of Grass Valley
City Council
Agenda Action Sheet

Council Meeting Date: June 8, 2021

Date Prepared: June 3, 2021

Prepared by: Mark Buttron- Fire Chief
Title: Annual Approval of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) Adjustment to the Special
Emergency Medical and Fire Response Tax.
Recommended Motion: That Council 1) Approve a rate increase to the Special Emergency
Medical and Fire Response Tax of 1.4% based on the December 2020 CPI. 2) Adopt Resolution
2021-16 requesting that the Nevada County Auditor place the adjusted special tax on the FY
21/22 property tax rolls.
Agenda: Consent
Background Information: In June of 1997 the voters of the City of Grass Valley approved the
Special Emergency Medical and Fire Response Tax (Measure A) to fund three additional
firefighters. The voter approval contained a provision allowing for an annual inflation adjustment
to the special tax based upon the CPI-All U.S. Cities for the prior calendar year. That adjustment
is necessary in order to maintain ongoing funding for the three firefighters. The CPI for the year
ending December 2020 was 1.4%
The 2021/2022 Special Emergency Medical and Fire Response Tax with the December 2020 CPI
applied are as follows:
Fiscal Year 2021/2022

Classification
Single Family Residential (per parcel)
Multi-Family (per unit-duplex or larger)
Mobile Home Park (per unit)
Commercial / Industrial (per business)
Any Other Improved Parcel
Any Unimproved Buildable Parcel

FY 20/21

1.40%

FY 21/22

2020
CPI Increase

Existing
45.32
22.04
31.30
48.56
48.56
16.12

0.63
0.31
0.44
0.68
0.68
0.23

$
$
$
$
$
$

New Fee
45.95
22.35
31.74
49.24
49.24
16.35

FY 21/22
Adjsuted per
Nevada Co.
Auditor
(0.01) $
(0.01) $
$
$
$
(0.01) $

Adjusted Fee
45.94
22.34
31.74
49.24
49.24
16.34

Agenda Item # _______

Page 26

Item # 3.

City of Grass Valley
City Council
Agenda Action Sheet

Council Goals/Objectives: Goal #6- Public Safety.
Fiscal Impact: N/A
Funds Available: N/A

Account #:

Reviewed by:
____ City Manager

Agenda Item # _______

Page 27

RESOLUTION NO. 2021-16

Item # 3.

RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR TO PLACE THE CURRENT
SPECIAL EMERGENCY MEDICAL AND FIRE RESPONSE TAX ON THE PROPERTY
TAX ROLL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020-21
WHEREAS, on March 11, 1997, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 97-22, calling
for a Special Municipal Election to be held in the City of Grass Valley on June 3, 1997 for the
purpose of submitting to the qualified voters of the City the issue as to whether to impose a
special emergency medical an fire response tax (Measure A); and
WHEREAS, a Special Election was held in the County of Nevada for the City of Grass
Valley on the 3rd day of June 1997, in accordance with the provisions of the City Charter,
California Elections Code, and other State Laws concerning election matters; and
WHEREAS, the County Clerk did conduct said election, canvass the returns and certify
the Statement of Results of the Election on June 5, 1997; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 218 required that all special taxes receive at least 66-2/3rds
vote and Measure A, the Emergency Medical and Fire Response Tax passed with a 78.3%
approval; and
WHEREAS, the special response tax contained a provision for an automatic cost of
living allowance not to exceed 5% per year; and
WHEREAS, the December 2020 cost of living allowance as determined by the CPI – All
U.S. Cities Index showed a 1.4% annual increase; and
WHEREAS, the cost of living allowance increase is necessary to continue to fund the
firefighters as provided for in the special emergency response tax; and
WHEREAS, the total CPI for establishing the FY 2021 - 2022 special tax is 1.4%.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Grass Valley, as
follows:
1. That the above recitals are true and correct.
2. The new special tax rates will now be:
Fiscal Year 2021/2022

Classification
Single Family Residential (per parcel)
Multi-Family (per unit-duplex or larger)
Mobile Home Park (per unit)
Commercial / Industrial (per business)
Any Other Improved Parcel
Any Unimproved Buildable Parcel

FY 20/21

1.40%

FY 21/22

2020
CPI Increase

Existing
45.32
22.04
31.30
48.56
48.56
16.12

0.63
0.31
0.44
0.68
0.68
0.23

$
$
$
$
$
$

New Fee
45.95
22.35
31.74
49.24
49.24
16.35

FY 21/22
Adjsuted per
Nevada Co.
Auditor
(0.01) $
(0.01) $
$
$
$
(0.01) $

Adjusted Fee
45.94
22.34
31.74
49.24
49.24
16.34

Page 28

Item # 3.

3. The City Council hereby requests that the County Auditor place the current
Emergency Medical and Fire Response Taxes on the FY 2021-22 property tax
roll.
4. The City Clerk is hereby requested to forward a copy of this resolution to the
County Auditor along with the information necessary for placement on the tax
roll.
ADOPTED as a Resolution of the Council of the City of Grass Valley at a meeting
thereof held on 8th day of June 2021 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINING:

_________________________________
Ben Aguilar, Mayor
ATTEST:

_________________________________
Taylor Day, Deputy City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_________________________________
Michael Colantuono, City Attorney

Page 29

Item # 4.

City of Grass Valley
City Council
Agenda Action Sheet

Council Meeting Date: June 8, 2021

Date Prepared: June 3, 2021

Prepared by: Bjorn P. Jones, PE, Assistant City Engineer
Title: GVTIF Program, Nexus Study and Update – Award Contract
Recommended Motion: That Council 1) authorize the Assistant City Engineer to execute a
Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with GHD, in the amount of $35,000 to update Grass
Valley Traffic Impact Fee Program 2) authorize the Assistant City Engineer to approve contract
change orders for up to 10% of the contract amount
Agenda: Consent
Background Information: On March 23, 2021, NCTC posted a request for proposals (RFP) for
consultants to provide a technical study and nexus analysis necessary to update the Western
Nevada County Regional Transportation Mitigation Fee (RTMF) Program, as well as concurrently
updating the Nevada County Local Traffic Mitigation Fee (LTMF) and Grass Valley Traffic
Impact Fee (GVTIF) Programs. The services agreement for all three updates is to be managed by
the NCTC with participation of the NCTC partner agencies, including Grass Valley.
One proposal was received from consultant firm GHD by the requested deadline. NCTC conducted
follow up inquiries to ensure that noticing and the opportunity to submit a response to the RFP was
adequate. A review of the qualifications and experience of GEH shows that they are more than
capable of completing the work, with years of experience in transportation planning and
engineering consulting.
Staff requests that Council authorize the Assistant City Engineer to award a PSA in the amount of
$35,000 to GHD and authorize approval of change orders up to 10% of the contract amount.
Council Goals/Objectives: The Technical Study and Nexus Analysis executes portions of work
tasks towards achieving/maintaining Strategic Goal #2 – Transportation.
Fiscal Impact: Costs attributed with the PSA work will be incurred in the next fiscal year.
Funds Available: Yes
Reviewed by:

Account #: 100-401-61080

____ City Manager

Agenda Item # _______
C:\windows\TEMP\tmp1828.tmp

Page 30

Item # 5.

City of Grass Valley
City Council
Agenda Action Sheet

Council Meeting Date: June 8, 2021

Date Prepared: June 3, 2021

Prepared by: Bjorn Jones, PE, Assistant City Engineer
Title: 2021/22 Capital Improvement Program – RMRA Budget
Recommended Motion: That Council adopt a Resolution to include Road Maintenance and
Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) funding in the Fiscal Year 2021/22 budget and specifying a list
of projects to be funded with RMRA funds.
Agenda: Consent
Background Information: California State Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and
Accountability Act of 2017, was passed by the Legislature and signed into law by the Governor in
April 2017 in order to address significant transportation infrastructure funding shortfalls statewide.
SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of the City
of Grass Valley are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which
projects have been completed each fiscal year. SB 1 requires the City of Grass Valley to provide
a specific list of projects proposed to receive funding from RMRA funding, including a description
and location of each proposed project.
Overall, the City of Grass Valley is scheduled to receive an estimated $250,000 in RMRA funding
in Fiscal Year 2021/22. Staff recommends that the FY 2021/22 budget and specifically the Annual
Street Rehabilitation Project budget, include the full $250,000 in RMRA funds. The Annual Street
Rehab Project will focus on basic maintenance and rehabilitation of the street infrastructure, with
proposed locations including Freeman Lane, Taylorville Road, McKnight Way and La Barr
Meadows Road. Staff requests that Council adopt the attached Resolution specifying a list of
RMRA funded projects in the CIP Budget.
Council Goals/Objectives: Utilization of RMRA funding executes portions of work tasks towards
achieving/maintaining Strategic Plan – Community Safety and City Infrastructure Investment.
Fiscal Impact: The City of Grass Valley will receive an estimated $250,000 in RMRA funding.
Funds Available: N/A
Reviewed by:

Account #: 180-6133

____ City Manager

C:\windows\TEMP\tmp9A3D.tmp

Agenda Item # _______

Page 31

RESOLUTION NO. 2021- 17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRASS VALLEY
AUTHORIZING THE INCLUSION OF ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION
ACCOUNT FUNDS IN THE FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 BUDGET AND INCORPORATING A LIST
OF PROJECTS FUNDED BY SENATE BILL 1

Item # 5.

WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, was
passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 in order to address
the significant transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the
residents of the City of Grass Valley are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our
community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grass Valley must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to
receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA),
created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a
proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Grass Valley will receive an estimated $250,000 in RMRA funding
in Fiscal Year 2021/22 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City of Grass Valley maintain and
rehabilitate the City street infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project list and budget included in this resolution reflect a list of
projects to be funded by SB 1; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRASS VALLEY, as follows:
1. The 2021/22 fiscal year budget include an estimated $250,000 in RMRA funds.
2. The attached list of proposed projects, including the 2021/22 Annual Street Rehabilitation
Project, will be funded in-part with the fiscal year 2021/22 RMRA revenues.
ADOPTED as a Resolution by the City Council of the City of Grass Valley at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 8th day of June 2021, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
_______________________________
Ben Aguilar, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ATTEST:

__________________________________
Michael G. Colantuono, City Attorney

_______________________________
Taylor Day, Deputy City Clerk

Page 1 of 1
C:\windows\TEMP\tmpF689.tmp

Page 32

Item # 6.

City of Grass Valley
City Council
Agenda Action Sheet

Council Meeting Date: June 8, 2021

Date Prepared: May 27, 2021

Prepared by: Alena Loomis, Community Services Analyst
Title: Collection of delinquent sewer and/or water accounts on the Nevada County tax roll
Recommended Motion: After holding a public hearing, adopt Resolution 2021- 19 requesting
that the County of Nevada levy and collect delinquent water and sewer service charges on the tax
roll.
Agenda: Public Hearing
Background Information: Health and Safety Code Section 5473 authorizes the City to place
delinquent sewer and/or water service charges on the tax roll for collection after the approval by a
two-thirds vote by the members of the City’s legislative body. This is done in the same manner as
property taxes are handled. This action was last performed in 2019, and not taken in 2020 due to
the COVID-19 pandemic. This gap in collection enforcement has led to a larger than normal
number of high past due balances. The City uses this option for sewer and/or water accounts where
service cannot be discontinued as a collection method. Since the County started using the teeter
plan for the distribution of tax revenues, the City has been receiving sewer and/or water bills placed
on the tax roll even if the property owner doesn’t pay the tax bill. The method is very effective
and allows the City to collect charges from customers that have not made payment.
All affected property owners have been notified as required by the Health and Safety Code. Any
amounts received from customers prior to submitting this request will be removed from the list.
The delinquent amount as of June 3, 2021 is $74,894.13, by the June 8, 2021 City Council Meeting
this amount could be less due to any payments received. The City mailed notification letters on
May 13, 2021 to inform property owners of any delinquent balances. A list of the delinquent
accounts will be provide to the Council prior to the meeting.
Council Goals/Objectives: The Collection of delinquent sewer and/or water accounts on the
Nevada County tax roll executes portions of work tasks towards achieving/maintaining Strategic
Plan Goal #7 – Water and Wastewater Systems & Underground Infrastructure.
Funds Available: NA

Account #:

N/A

Reviewed by:

____ City Manager

C:\windows\TEMP\tmp2EAB.tmp

Agenda Item # _______

Page 33

Item # 6.

RESOLUTION NO. 2021 - 19
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE NEVADA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY AUDITOR AND THE COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR
TO LEVY AND COLLECT DELINQUENT SEWER AND/OR WATER SERVICE CHARGES
AGAINST CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF GRASS VALLEY
AND THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF NEVADA COUNTY
WHEREAS, the City of Grass Valley has submitted bills to certain property owners for sewer
and/ or water charges assessed in accordance with Grass Valley Municipal Code Chapter 13.12; and
WHEREAS, the recipients of SEWER and/or WATER services applicable to those charges
have not made payment; and
WHEREAS, the California Health and Safety Code Section 5473 authorizes a City to place
delinquent sewer and/or water charges on the tax roll after the approval by a two-thirds vote by the
members of the legislative body;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Grass Valley, as follows:
1. That the Nevada County Board of Supervisors is hereby requested to authorize the Nevada
County Tax Collector to levy and collect unpaid sewer and/or water charges in the amount and
against the Parcel and Owners of Record as set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference.
2. Exhibit "A" represents charges that are more than 60 days delinquent as of May 27, 2021
and does not reflect payments received after that date. Exhibit "A" is subject to deletion for owners
rendering payment prior to submitting to the County.
3. That the City Council understands that costs for this service will be charged in accordance
with the "Standard Form Tax Collection Services" contract between the City of Grass Valley and the
County of Nevada.
ADOPTED as a Resolution of the Council of the City of Grass Valley at a meeting thereof held
on the 8th of June 2021, by the following vote:
AYES: Council Member
NOES: Council Member
ABSENT: Council Member
ABSTAINING: Council Member
_______________________________________
Ben Aguilar, Mayor
ATTEST:

_______________________________________
Taylor Day, Deputy City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_______________________________________
Michael G. Colantuono, City Attorney

Page 34

Item # 7.

City of Grass Valley
City Council
Agenda Action Sheet

Council Meeting Date: June 8, 2021

Date Prepared: June 3, 2021

Prepared by:

Andy Heath, Finance Director

Title:

Adopt five Resolutions of Intention to Order Improvements for
Landscaping and Lighting Districts (LLD) – Annual Assessments
for Fiscal Year 2021-22 and Benefit Assessments Districts (A.D.)
– Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2021-22 and set public
hearing on June 22, 2021.

Agenda:

Consent

Recommended Motion:

Adopt five Resolutions of Intention for Commercial LLD #1988-1,
Residential LLD #1988-2, Morgan Ranch Unit 7 A.D. #2003-1,
Morgan Ranch West A.D. #2010-1 and Ridge Meadows A.D. and
set public hearing on June 22, 2021. The five Resolutions related
to the Commercial and Residential Landscaping and Lighting
Districts, the Morgan Ranch-Unit 7 Benefit Assessment District,
the Morgan Ranch West Benefit Assessment District and Ridge
Meadows Benefit Assessment District are as follows:
1)

2)

3)

Resolution of Intention No. 2021-21 to Order
Improvements Pursuant to The Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972 – Assessment District No. 1988-1, Commercial
Landscaping and Lighting District.
Resolution of Intention No. 2021-22 to Order
Improvements Pursuant to The Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972 – Assessment District No. 1988-2, Residential
Landscaping and Lighting District.
Resolution of Intention No. 2021-23 to Order
Improvements Pursuant to The Benefit Assessment Act of
1982 (Sections 54703 and following, California
Government Code; hereafter the “1982 Act”) – Morgan
Ranch-Unit 7 Benefit Assessment District No. 2003-1.

Page 35

Item # 7.

City of Grass Valley
City Council
Agenda Action Sheet

4)

5)

Resolution of Intention No. 2021-24 to Order
Improvements Pursuant to The Benefit Assessment Act of
1982 (Sections 54703 and following, California
Government Code; hereafter the “1982 Act”) – Morgan
Ranch West Benefit Assessment District No. 2010-1.
Resolution of Intention No. 2021-25 to Order
Improvements Pursuant to The Benefit Assessment Act of
1982 (Sections 54703 and following, California
Government Code; hereafter the “1982 Act”) – Ridge
Meadows Benefit Assessment District No. 2016-1.

BACKGROUND
In order to continue funding for the maintenance of improvements in the City’s landscaping and
lighting districts and benefit assessment districts, an annual assessment must be levied and placed
on the County of Nevada Tax Roll. The proceeds of the annual landscaping and lighting district
assessments pay for maintenance of landscaping and associated structures, landscape related
utilities, city administration costs and street lighting costs within the boundaries of the district.
The proceeds of the annual benefit assessment districts pay for storm drain maintenance, retaining
wall maintenance and city administration costs within the boundaries of the district.
The Engineer’s reports and assessment spreads are complete and will be filed within the time
required prior to the public hearing scheduled for June 22, 2021.
COUNCIL GOALS / OBJECTIVES
The Landscape & Lighting Districts (LLD) and Benefit Assessment Districts (A.D.) annual
assessments supports the Strategic Plan – City Infrastructure Investment by covering costs for
community-specific structures and services.
FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed fiscal year 2021-22 assessments for the City’s Landscape and Lighting Districts and
Benefit Assessment Districts total $75,658 as compared to $78,041 for fiscal year 2020-21, a
decrease of $2,383. This is due to CPI increases for some Districts while other Districts will be
utilizing existing fund balance or leaving amounts the same as the prior year.

Page 36

Item # 7.

RESOLUTION NO. 2021-21
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ORDER IMPROVEMENTS
PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1988-1 (Commercial Landscaping and
Lighting District, Whispering Pines and Litton Business Park)
The City Council of the City of Grass Valley resolves:
1. The City Council intends to levy and collect assessments within City of Grass
Valley Assessment District No. 1988-1 (Commercial Landscaping and Lighting District –
Whispering Pines and Litton Business Park) during Fiscal Year 2021-22. The area of
land to be assessed is located in the City of Grass Valley, Nevada County.
2. The improvements to be made in this assessment district are generally
described as follows:
Zone 1 – Whispering Pines
The maintenance of landscaping and operation of associated structures
including payment for the cost of water and power utilities for irrigation
controllers and street lights.
Zone 2 – Litton Business Park
The maintenance of landscaping and operation of associated structures
including payment for the cost of water and power utilities for irrigation
controllers and street lights; and the maintenance of drainage ditches and
operation of associated structures including the removal of silt.
This description is from the Commercial Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1988-1
Engineer’s Report.
3. Timothy M. Kiser, P.E., Engineer of Work, has filed with the City Clerk the
Commercial Landscaping & Lighting District No 1988-1 Engineer’s Report required by
the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. All interested persons are referred to that
report for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the
assessment district and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels

Page 37

Item # 7.

of land within the assessment district.
4. The Council hereby approves the Engineer’s report as filed, incorporated
herein by reference.
5. On Tuesday, the 22nd day of June, 2021, at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m. or
as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard; the City Council will conduct a public
hearing on the question of the levy of the proposed annual assessment. The hearing
will be held at the Grass Valley City Council Chambers, Grass Valley, California.
6. For Fiscal Year 2021-22, the Engineering Department has proposed
$25,396.60 assessment revenue for Whispering Pines. The increase of $399.80
represents a 1.6 percent inflation adjustment. For Litton Business Park, $5,717.10 is
proposed assessment revenue. The increase of $89.30 represents a 1.6 percent
inflation adjustment.
7. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to give the notice of hearing
required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.
ADOPTED as a Resolution of the Council of the City of Grass Valley at a
meeting thereof held on the 8th day of June, 2021, by the following vote:
AYES:

Council Members

NOES:

Council Members

ABSENT:

Council Members

ABSTAINING:

Council Members
______________________________
Ben Aguilar, Mayor
ATTEST:

______________________________
Taylor Day, Deputy City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Michael Colantuono, City Attorney

Page 38

Item # 7.

RESOLUTION NO. 2021-22
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ORDER IMPROVEMENTS
PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1988-2 (Residential Landscaping and Lighting
District – Morgan Ranch, Ventana Sierra, Scotia Pines, Morgan Ranch West and
Ridge Meadows)
The City Council of the City of Grass Valley resolves:
1. The City Council intends to levy and collect assessments within City of Grass Valley
Assessment District No. 1988-2 (Residential Landscaping and Lighting District – Morgan Ranch,
Ventana Sierra, Scotia Pines, Morgan Ranch West & Ridge Meadows) during Fiscal Year 202122. The area of land to be assessed is located in the City of Grass Valley, Nevada County.
2. The improvements to be made in this assessment district are generally described as
follows:
Zone I – Morgan Ranch
The maintenance of landscaping and operation of associated structures including
payment for the cost of water and power utilities and power costs for street lights.
Zone II – Ventana Sierra (Tract 09-03)
The maintenance of landscaping and operation of associated structures including
payment for the cost of water and power utilities; power costs for street lights and a
maintenance fund for the retaining walls of the project.
Zone III – Scotia Pines Subdivision
The maintenance of Parcels A, B and C, including weed and mosquito abatement
and cost of power for street lights.
Zone IV – Morgan Ranch West
The maintenance and power costs for street lights.
Zone V – Ridge Meadows
The maintenance of landscaping and operation of associated structures including
payment for the cost of water and power utilities, power costs for street lights and a
maintenance fund for retaining walls of the project.
This description is from the Residential Landscaping & Lighting District 1988-2 Engineer’s
Report.

Page 39

Item # 7.

3. Timothy M. Kiser, P.E., Engineer of Work, has filed with the City Clerk the Residential
Landscaping & Lighting District 1988-2 Engineer’s Report required by the Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972. All interested persons are referred to that report for a full and detailed
description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and the proposed
assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the assessment district.
4. The Council hereby approves the Engineer’s report as filed, incorporated herein by
reference.
5. On Tuesday, the 22nd day of June, 2021, at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m. or as soon
thereafter as the matter can be heard; the City Council will conduct a public hearing on the
question of the levy of the proposed annual assessment. The hearing will be held at the Grass
Valley Council Chambers, 125 East Main St., Grass Valley, California.
6. For Fiscal Year 2021-22, the Engineering Department has proposed a revenue
assessment estimate for Scotia Pines in the amount of $3,917.10. This is an increase of $61.60
from the prior year and represents a 1.6 percent inflation adjustment. Based on the total number
of parcels in Scotia Pines, the levy is $71.22 per dwelling unit.
7. For Fiscal Year 2021-22, the Engineering Department has proposed a revenue
assessment estimate for Ventana Sierra in the amount of $3,100.04. There is a slight increase
of $0.04 from the prior year and costs will utilize a portion of existing fund balance. Based on
the total number of parcels in Ventana Sierra, the levy is $163.16 per dwelling unit.
8. For Fiscal Year 2021-22, the Engineering Department has proposed a revenue
assessment estimate for Morgan Ranch in the amount of $24,802.56, which includes
appropriate levels of funding for the reserve. This is an increase of $383.56 and represents a
1.6 percent inflation adjustment. Based on the total number of parcels in Morgan Ranch, the
levy is $64.60 per dwelling unit.
9. For Fiscal Year 2021-22, the Engineering Department has proposed a revenue
assessment estimate for Morgan Ranch West in the amount of $500.00. There is no change in
the assessment from the previous year. Based on the total number of parcels in Morgan Ranch

Page 40

Item # 7.

West, the levy is $20.00 per dwelling unit.
10. For Fiscal Year 2021-22, the Engineering Department has proposed a revenue
assessment estimate for Ridge Meadows in the amount of $9,144.18. This is the same amount
as the prior year. Costs will utilize a portion of existing fund balance. Based on the total number
of parcels in Ridge Meadows, the levy is $247.14 per dwelling unit.
11. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to give the notice of hearing required by the
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.
ADOPTED as a Resolution of the Council of the City of Grass Valley at a meeting thereof
held on the 8th day of June 2021, by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members
NOES: Council Members
ABSENT: Council Members
ABSTAINING: Council Members
______________________________
Ben Aguilar, Mayor
ATTEST:

______________________________
Taylor Day, Deputy City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Michael Colantuono, City Attorney

Page 41

Item # 7.

RESOLUTION NO. 2021-23
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ORDER IMPROVEMENTS
PURSUANT TO THE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2003-1
(Morgan Ranch-Unit 7)
The City Council of the City of Grass Valley resolves:
1. The City Council intends to levy and collect assessments within City of Grass
Valley Benefit Assessment District No. 2003-1 (Morgan Ranch – Unit 7) during Fiscal
Year 2021-22. The area of land to be assessed is located in the City of Grass Valley,
Nevada County.
2. The improvements to be made in this assessment district are generally
described as the maintenance, operation and servicing of drainage improvements in the
District
3. Timothy M. Kiser, P.E., Engineer of Work has filed with the City Clerk the
report required by the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982. All interested persons are
referred to that report for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the
boundaries of the assessment district and the proposed assessments upon assessable
lots and parcels of land within the assessment district.
4. On Tuesday, the 22nd day of June, 2021, at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m. or
as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard; the City Council will conduct a public
hearing on the question of the levy of the proposed annual assessment. The hearing
will be held at the Grass Valley Council Chambers, 125 East Main St., Grass Valley,
California.
5. For Fiscal Year 2021-22, the Engineering Department has proposed a
revenue assessment estimate for Morgan Ranch-Unit 7 in the amount of $480.00. This

Page 42

Item # 7.

is a decrease of $720.00 from the prior year and will utilize a portion of existing fund
balance. Based on the total number of parcels in Morgan Ranch-Unit 7, the levy is
$20.00 per dwelling unit.
6. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to give the notice of hearing
required by the Benefit Assessment District Act of 1982.
ADOPTED as a Resolution of the Council of the City of Grass Valley at a
meeting thereof held on the 8th day of June, 2021, by the following vote:
AYES:

Council Members

NOES:

Council Members

ABSENT:

Council Members

ABSTAINING:

Council Members
______________________________
Ben Aguilar, Mayor
ATTEST:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Taylor Day, Deputy City Clerk
______________________________
Michael Colantuono, City Attorney

Page 43

Item # 7.

RESOLUTION NO. 2021-24
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ORDER IMPROVEMENTS
PURSUANT TO THE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2010-1
(Morgan Ranch West)
The City Council of the City of Grass Valley resolves:
1. The City Council intends to levy and collect assessments within City of Grass
Valley Benefit Assessment District No. 2010-1 (Morgan Ranch West) during Fiscal Year
2021-22. The area of land to be assessed is located in the City of Grass Valley,
Nevada County.
2. The improvements to be made in this assessment district are described as
the maintenance, operation and servicing of drainage improvements in the District.
3. Timothy M. Kiser, P.E., Engineer of Work, has filed with the City Clerk the
report required by the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982. All interested persons are
referred to that report for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the
boundaries of the assessment district and the proposed assessments upon assessable
lots and parcels of land within the assessment district.
4. On Tuesday, the 22nd day of June, 2021, at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m. or
as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard; the City Council will conduct a public
hearing on the question of the levy of the proposed annual assessment. The hearing
will be held at the Grass Valley Council Chambers, 125 East Main St., Grass Valley,
California.
5. For Fiscal Year 2021-22, the Engineering Department has proposed a
revenue assessment estimate for Morgan Ranch West in the amount of $750.00. This
is a decrease of $450.00 from the prior year and costs will use a portion of existing fund

Page 44

Item # 7.

balance. Based on the total number of parcels in Morgan Ranch West, the levy is
$30.00 per dwelling unit.
6. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to give the notice of hearing
required by the Benefit Assessment District Act of 1982.
ADOPTED as a Resolution of the Council of the City of Grass Valley at a
meeting thereof held on the 8th day of June, 2021, by the following vote:
AYES:

Council Members

NOES:

Council Members

ABSENT:

Council Members

ABSTAINING:

Council Members
______________________________
Ben Aguilar, Mayor
ATTEST:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Taylor Day, Deputy City Clerk
______________________________
Michael Colantuono, City Attorney

Page 45

Item # 7.

RESOLUTION NO. 2021-25
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ORDER IMPROVEMENTS
PURSUANT TO THE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2016-1
(Ridge Meadows)
The City Council of the City of Grass Valley resolves:
1. The City Council intends to levy and collect assessments within City of Grass
Valley Benefit Assessment District No. 2016-1 (Ridge Meadows) during Fiscal Year
2021-22. The area of land to be assessed is located in the City of Grass Valley,
Nevada County.
2. The improvements to be made in this assessment district are described as
the maintenance, operation and servicing of drainage improvements in the District.
3. Timothy M. Kiser, P.E., Engineer of Work, has filed with the City Clerk the
report required by the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982. All interested persons are
referred to that report for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the
boundaries of the assessment district and the proposed assessments upon assessable
lots and parcels of land within the assessment district.
4. On Tuesday, the 22nd day of June, 2021, at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m. or
as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard; the City Council will conduct a public
hearing on the question of the levy of the proposed annual assessment. The hearing
will be held at the Grass Valley Council Chambers, 125 East Main St., Grass Valley,
California.
5. For Fiscal Year 2021-22, the Engineering Department has proposed a
revenue assessment estimate for Ridge Meadows in the amount of $1,850.00. This
amount represents at $2,147.48 decrease from FY 2020-21 due to the intended use of

Page 46

Item # 7.

available reserves. Based on the total number of parcels in Ridge Meadows, the levy is
$50.00 per dwelling unit.
6. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to give the notice of hearing
required by the Benefit Assessment District Act of 1982.
ADOPTED as a Resolution of the Council of the City of Grass Valley at a
meeting thereof held on the 8th day of June, 2021, by the following vote:
AYES:

Council Members

NOES:

Council Members

ABSENT:

Council Members

ABSTAINING:

Council Members
______________________________
Ben Aguilar, Mayor
ATTEST:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Taylor Day, Deputy City Clerk
______________________________
Michael Colantuono, City Attorney

Page 47

Item # 7.

ENGINEER’S REPORT
COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1988-1

ANNUAL ASSESMENT 2021/2022

for

CITY OF GRASS VALLEY
NEVADA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Respectfully submitted, as directed by the City Council.

By:

_____________________
Timothy M. Kiser, P.E.
R.C.E. No. 58534

Page 48

Item # 7.

ENGINEER’S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
COMMERCIAL LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1988-1
(Whispering Pines and Litton Business Park)

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and
Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the _______ day of ______________,
2021.
___________________________________
City Clerk, City of Grass Valley
Nevada County, California

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and
Assessment Diagram thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City
of Grass Valley, California, on the _______ day of _________________, 2021.

___________________________________
City Clerk, City of Grass Valley
Nevada County, California

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and
Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Nevada
on the _______ day of ___________________, 2021.

___________________________________
City Clerk, City of Grass Valley
Nevada County, California

Page 49
H:\L&L\2021-22\Commercial\2122EngReport_Com L&L.docx

City of Grass Valley
2021/2022 Engineer’s Report
Commercial Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1988-1

Item # 7.

OVERVIEW
Timothy M. Kiser, Engineer of Work for Commercial Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1988-1
(Zone 1 - Whispering Pines and Zone 2 - Litton Business Park), City of Grass Valley, Nevada County,
California makes this report, as directed by City Council, pursuant to Section 22585 of the Streets and
Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
The improvements which are the subject matter of this report are briefly described as follows:
Zone 1 - Whispering Pines
The installation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping and associated improvements, as
delineated on the plans prepared by Josephine McProud, Landscape Architect, on file with the
City of Grass Valley, and modified by subsequent development, or changes instituted by the City
of Grass Valley in the routine administration of the district. Maintenance, in general, means the
furnishing of labor and materials for the ordinary upkeep and care of landscape areas including:
1. The repair, removal or replacement of any improvement.
2. Landscaping, including cultivation, weeding, mowing, pruning, tree removal, replanting,
spraying, fertilizing, and treating for disease.
3. Irrigation, including the operation, adjustment and repair of the irrigation system.
4. The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and solid waste.
Servicing means the furnishing and payment of:
1. Electric power for any public street light facilities or for the operation of any
improvements.
2. Water for the irrigation of any landscaping or the maintenance of any improvements.
Zone 2 - Litton Business Park
The installation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping and associated improvements, as
delineated on the plans prepared by Josephine McProud, Landscape Architect, on file with the
City of Grass Valley, and modified by subsequent development, or changes instituted by the City
of Grass Valley in the routine administration of the district. Maintenance, in general, means the
furnishing of labor and materials for the ordinary upkeep and care of landscape areas including:
1. The repair, removal or replacement of any improvement.
2. Landscaping, including cultivation, weeding, mowing, pruning, tree removal, replanting,
spraying, fertilizing, and treating for disease.
3. Irrigation, including the operation, adjustment and repair of the irrigation system.
4. The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and solid waste.
Servicing means the furnishing and payment of:
1. Electric power for any public street light facilities or for the operation of any
improvements.
2. Water for the irrigation of any landscaping or the maintenance of any improvements.
The installation and maintenance of drainage ditches, trails and associated improvements, as
delineated on the improvement plans for Litton Business Park - Phase One prepared by Nevada
City Engineering, Inc., on file with the City of Grass Valley, including:
Page 50

Item # 7.

1. The repair, removal or replacement of any improvement.
2. The trimming, pruning, spraying and removal of vegetative matter.
3. The removal of silt, rubbish debris and solid waste.
This report consists of five (5) parts, as follows:
PART A Plans and specifications for the improvements that are filed with
the City Clerk. Although separately bound, the plans and specifications are a part
of this report and are included in it by reference only.
PART B 2021/2022.

An estimate of the cost of the improvements for Fiscal Year

PART C An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvement and levy
on each benefiting parcel of land within the district.
PART D The Method of Apportionment by which the undersigned has
determined the amount proposed to be levied on each parcel.
PART E A diagram showing all parcels of real property within this district.
The diagram is keyed to Part C by Assessor’s Parcel Number.

Page 51
H:\L&L\2021-22\Commercial\2122EngReport_Com L&L.docx

Item # 7.

PART A
PLANS
Plans for the landscape, irrigation and street lighting for each zone have been prepared by a variety of
landscape architects and engineers. These Plans have been filed separately with the City Engineer’s
office and are incorporated in this Report by reference only as the initial improvements were completed
by separate contracts.

Page 52
H:\L&L\2021-22\Commercial\2122EngReport_Com L&L.docx

Item # 7.

PART B
COST ESTIMATE
The estimated cost for the maintenance of improvements described in this report for the fiscal year 2021/2022
includes the use of reserve funds to provide maintenance of the landscape areas and is as follows:

ZONE 1
(Whispe ring Pine s)

ZONE 2
(Litton Busine ss Park)

COST INFORMATION
Direct Maintenance Costs
Water and Electricity
County Administrative Fee
City Administration Costs

$33,500
$10,000
$250
$647

$4,500
$1,500
$228
$489

Total Direct and Admin Costs

$44,397

$6,717

ASSESSMENT INFORMATION
Direct Costs
Reserve Collections/ (Transfer)

$44,397
($19,000)

$6,717
($1,000)

Ne t Total Asse ssme nt

$25,397

$5,717

Projected Reserve After FY 2020/21
Interest Earnings
Reserve Fund Adjustments

$43,709
$65
($19,000)

$6,403
$40
($1,000)

Proje cte d Re se rve at End of Ye ar

$24,774

$5,443

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION

Page 53
H:\L&L\2021-22\Commercial\2122EngReport_Com L&L.docx

Item # 7.

PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Zone 1 - Whispering Pines
FISCAL
YEAR

TOTAL ASSESSMENT GOAL

MAX ASSESSMENT
Last Year + 1.6% CPI

TOTAL ASSESSMENT

2021/2022

$25,395.75

$25,396.75

$25,396.60

Percentage
of Net Area

Percent of
Whispering Pines
Lane frontage

1.11%
1.95%
1.59%
2.16%
0.85%
1.10%
0.93%
0.00%
0.00%
6.33%
1.73%
1.30%
1.30%
0.00%
0.00%
0.66%
0.66%
0.65%
0.00%
0.35%
0.31%
0.32%
0.33%
0.33%
0.32%
0.32%
0.32%
0.31%
0.33%
0.33%
0.32%
0.32%
0.33%
0.33%
0.32%
0.33%
0.34%
0.36%
0.37%
1.12%
1.14%
1.52%
1.48%
1.87%
1.06%
1.42%
1.00%

3.82%
8.70%
4.42%
3.57%
3.31%
3.25%
3.47%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
3.03%
2.28%
2.22%
0.00%
0.00%
1.23%
1.23%
1.23%
0.00%
0.37%
0.37%
0.37%
0.37%
0.37%
0.37%
0.37%
0.37%
0.37%
0.37%
0.37%
0.37%
0.37%
0.37%
0.37%
0.37%
0.37%
0.37%
0.37%
0.37%
2.53%
4.16%
7.62%
0.00%
8.18%
2.51%
0.00%
3.52%

Levy
626.40
1,352.00
764.00
728.10
527.60
551.80
559.30
0.00
0.00
803.50
604.40
454.40
448.10
0.00
0.00
239.90
239.90
238.70
0.00
90.90
86.60
87.00
88.50
89.00
87.30
87.50
86.90
86.70
88.70
88.50
87.50
87.60
89.00
88.90
87.20
88.60
90.10
92.10
94.40
463.60
672.40
1,161.00
188.20
1,276.00
453.40
179.90
573.10

Assessor Parcel No.
009-680-003
009-680-004
009-680-005
009-680-006
009-680-007
009-680-009
009-680-015
009-680-019
009-680-022
009-680-024
009-680-025
009-680-026
009-680-027
009-680-037
009-680-038
009-680-039
009-680-040
009-680-041
28A
28B
28C
28D
28E
28F
28G
28H
28I
28J
28K
28L
28M
28N
28O
28P
28Q
28R
28S
28T
28U
009-680-054
009-690-001
009-690-002
009-690-004
009-690-005
009-690-009
009-690-012
009-690-013

Tax
Area
Code
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056

1st
Installment
313.20
676.00
382.00
364.05
263.80
275.90
279.65
0.00
0.00
401.75
302.20
227.20
224.05
0.00
0.00
119.95
119.95
119.35
0.00
45.45
43.30
43.50
44.25
44.50
43.65
43.75
43.45
43.35
44.35
44.25
43.75
43.80
44.50
44.45
43.60
44.30
45.05
46.05
47.20
231.80
336.20
580.50
94.10
638.00
226.70
89.95
286.55

2nd
Installment
313.20
676.00
382.00
364.05
263.80
275.90
279.65
0.00
0.00
401.75
302.20
227.20
224.05
0.00
0.00
119.95
119.95
119.35
0.00
45.45
43.30
43.50
44.25
44.50
43.65
43.75
43.45
43.35
44.35
44.25
43.75
43.80
44.50
44.45
43.60
44.30
45.05
46.05
47.20
231.80
336.20
580.50
94.10
638.00
226.70
89.95
286.55

Page 54
H:\L&L\2021-22\Commercial\2122Assessment Roll Levy_Com

Zone 1 - Page 1

5/27/2021

Item # 7.

PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Zone 1 - Whispering Pines
1.86%
2.27%
1.30%
2.12%
0.00%
0.25%
0.28%
0.22%
0.18%
0.25%
0.27%
0.19%
0.22%
0.00%
0.14%
0.12%
0.13%
0.14%
0.11%
0.12%
0.12%
0.10%
0.09%
0.10%
0.09%
0.10%
0.09%
0.09%
0.09%
0.09%
0.10%
0.09%
0.09%
1.72%
1.41%
1.82%
4.41%
1.34%
1.68%
2.04%
1.59%
2.53%
2.52%
2.35%
1.32%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
1.40%
0.96%
1.00%
1.18%
0.00%
3.19%
2.29%
1.87%

3.46%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.34%
0.34%
0.34%
0.34%
0.34%
0.34%
0.34%
0.34%
0.34%
0.34%
0.34%
0.34%
0.34%
0.34%
0.34%
0.34%
0.34%
0.34%
0.34%
3.06%
3.06%
0.00%
0.86%
5.39%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%

676.00
288.70
164.50
268.60
0.00
31.70
35.20
28.10
23.40
31.70
34.00
24.60
28.10
0.00
60.80
58.40
59.60
60.80
57.20
58.40
58.40
56.10
54.90
56.10
54.90
56.10
54.90
54.90
54.90
54.90
56.10
54.90
54.90
607.40
566.80
230.80
669.10
855.30
213.00
259.20
202.40
321.90
319.50
298.20
168.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
177.50
121.90
126.60
150.30
0.00
404.70
291.10
237.90

009-690-015
009-690-016
009-690-019
009-690-025
009-750-002
009-750-003
009-750-004
009-750-005
009-750-006
009-750-007
009-750-008
009-750-009
009-750-010
009-690-040
009-690-041
009-690-042
009-690-043
009-690-044
009-690-045
009-690-046
009-690-047
009-690-048
009-690-049
009-690-050
009-690-051
009-690-052
009-690-053
009-690-054
009-690-055
009-690-056
009-690-057
009-690-058
009-690-059
009-690-031
009-690-032
009-690-036
009-690-037
009-690-039
009-770-021
009-770-022
009-770-023
009-770-024
009-770-025
009-770-032
009-770-033
009-770-034
009-770-035
009-770-037
009-770-038
009-770-039
009-770-049
009-770-050
009-770-057
009-770-058
009-770-059
009-770-060

01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01051
01051
01051
01051
01051
01051
01051
01054
01054
01051
01056
01056
01051
01051
01056
01051
01051
01051

338.00
144.35
82.25
134.30
0.00
15.85
17.60
14.05
11.70
15.85
17.00
12.30
14.05
0.00
30.40
29.20
29.80
30.40
28.60
29.20
29.20
28.05
27.45
28.05
27.45
28.05
27.45
27.45
27.45
27.45
28.05
27.45
27.45
303.70
283.40
115.40
334.55
427.65
106.50
129.60
101.20
160.95
159.75
149.10
84.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
88.75
60.95
63.30
75.15
0.00
202.35
145.55
118.95

338.00
144.35
82.25
134.30
0.00
15.85
17.60
14.05
11.70
15.85
17.00
12.30
14.05
0.00
30.40
29.20
29.80
30.40
28.60
29.20
29.20
28.05
27.45
28.05
27.45
28.05
27.45
27.45
27.45
27.45
28.05
27.45
27.45
303.70
283.40
115.40
334.55
427.65
106.50
129.60
101.20
160.95
159.75
149.10
84.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
88.75
60.95
63.30
75.15
0.00
202.35
145.55
118.95
Page 55

H:\L&L\2021-22\Commercial\2122Assessment Roll Levy_Com

Zone 1 - Page 2

5/27/2021

Item # 7.

PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Zone 1 - Whispering Pines
3.77%
2.34%
0.55%
1.20%
3.73%
0.00%
0.53%
0.00%
0.16%
0.20%

0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%

478.10
297.00
69.80
152.70
473.40
0.00
67.80
0.00
20.50
25.20

Total - Zone 1 =

$25,396.60

009-770-063
009-770-065
009-770-068
009-770-069
009-770-070
009-770-071
009-770-072
009-770-073
009-770-074
009-770-075

01051
01051
01051
01051
01051
01051
01051
01051
01051
01051

239.05
148.50
34.90
76.35
236.70
0.00
33.90
0.00
10.25
12.60

239.05
148.50
34.90
76.35
236.70
0.00
33.90
0.00
10.25
12.60

$12,698.30

$12,698.30

Page 56
H:\L&L\2021-22\Commercial\2122Assessment Roll Levy_Com

Zone 1 - Page 3

5/27/2021

Item # 7.

PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Zone 2 - Litton Business Park

FISCAL YEAR

TOTAL ASSESSMENT GOAL

2021/2022

$5,717.54

MAX ASSESSMENT
Last Year + 1.6% CPI
$5,717.54

TOTAL
ASSESSMENT

TOTAL
ASSESSMENT

$5,717.10

$5,717.10

Development
Areas

Levy

Assessor Parcel No.

Tax Area Code

1st Installment

2nd Installment

1
1
1
1
0.83
0.17
1
1
1
1
1
0.2482
0.2482
0.5035
0
0
0.0561
0.0523
0.0523
0.0561
0.1412
0.0546
0.0874
0.1031
0.0575
0.0561
0.0503
0.0499
0.0479
0.1352
1
1
1
1
1
0.1928
0.0628

$300.90
$300.90
$300.90
$300.90
$249.80
$51.20
$300.90
$300.90
$300.90
$300.90
$300.90
$74.70
$74.70
$151.50
$0.00
$0.00
$16.90
$15.70
$15.70
$16.90
$42.50
$16.40
$26.30
$31.00
$17.30
$16.90
$15.10
$15.00
$14.40
$40.70
$300.90
$300.90
$300.90
$300.90
$300.90
$58.00
$18.90

008-060-056
035-260-074
035-330-015
035-330-016
035-330-020
035-330-021
035-530-009
035-530-010
035-530-012
035-530-013
035-530-014
035-530-017
035-530-018
035-530-019
035-540-003
035-540-014
035-540-015
035-540-016
035-540-017
035-540-018
035-540-019
035-540-020
035-540-021
035-540-022
035-540-023
035-540-024
035-540-025
035-540-026
035-540-027
035-540-028
035-540-005
035-540-006
035-540-012
035-540-032
035-540-033
035-590-003
035-590-004

01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056

150.45
150.45
150.45
150.45
124.90
25.60
150.45
150.45
150.45
150.45
150.45
37.35
37.35
75.75
0.00
0.00
8.45
7.85
7.85
8.45
21.25
8.20
13.15
15.50
8.65
8.45
7.55
7.50
7.20
20.35
150.45
150.45
150.45
150.45
150.45
29.00
9.45

150.45
150.45
150.45
150.45
124.90
25.60
150.45
150.45
150.45
150.45
150.45
37.35
37.35
75.75
0.00
0.00
8.45
7.85
7.85
8.45
21.25
8.20
13.15
15.50
8.65
8.45
7.55
7.50
7.20
20.35
150.45
150.45
150.45
150.45
150.45
29.00
9.45

H:\L&L\2021-22\Commercial\2122Assessment Roll Levy_ComZone 2 - Page 1

5/27/2021

Page 57

Item # 7.

PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Zone 2 - Litton Business Park
0.1570
0.0854
0.1151
0.1412
0.0948
0.1457
0.2641
0.0638
0.0651
0.1123
0.0764
0.0941
0.0855
0.0658
0.0651
0.1129

$47.20
$25.70
$34.60
$42.50
$28.50
$43.90
$79.50
$19.20
$19.60
$33.80
$23.00
$28.30
$25.70
$19.80
$19.60
$34.00

035-590-005
035-590-006
035-590-007
035-590-008
035-590-009
035-590-010
035-590-011
035-590-012
035-590-013
035-590-014
035-590-015
035-590-016
035-590-017
035-590-018
035-590-023
035-590-020

19
(rounded)

$5,717.10

= Total - Zone 2

01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056

H:\L&L\2021-22\Commercial\2122Assessment Roll Levy_ComZone 2 - Page 2

23.60
12.85
17.30
21.25
14.25
21.95
39.75
9.60
9.80
16.90
11.50
14.15
12.85
9.90
9.80
17.00

23.60
12.85
17.30
21.25
14.25
21.95
39.75
9.60
9.80
16.90
11.50
14.15
12.85
9.90
9.80
17.00

$2,858.55

$2,858.55

5/27/2021

Page 58

Item # 7.

PART D
METHOD OF APPORTIONING
In order to maintain sufficient funding for the Districts, assessments will be adjusted annually by the
Consumer Price Indexes (CPI) Pacific Cities and U.S. City Average for February of the year of
calculation All Items Indexes for the West. The corresponding CPI for February 2021 was 1.6%.
ZONE 1 - Whispering Pines
The Whispering Pines development created the 1988-1 Commercial L&L District in 1988. Because the
district was created before Proposition 218, the initial assessment per property has been adjusted
annually based on actual increases in utility and maintenance costs and the balance of the operational
reserve fund.
The annual maximum assessments shall be adjusted annually, as set forth hereinafter, based upon the
Consumer Price Indexes Pacific Cities and U.S. City Average as issued by the United States Department
of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. The Base Index to be used for subsequent annual adjustments
(“Base Index”) shall be the Index published annually in February (“Base Month”). The annual maximum
assessment per lot, as defined in this report, shall be adjusted every year based upon the cumulative
increase, if any, in the Index as it stands on the Base Month of each year over the Base Index. Any
reduction or de-escalation in the Index from one year to the next will not result in a reduction of the
annual costs. The annual costs will be levied consistent with the previous year.
This assessment spread uses two factors to determine individual lot assessments. Fifty percent of the
cost is spread using the net area of each lot as to the total net area. Net area is the area remaining in each
lot after deducting the area dedicated to open space. The remaining fifty percent is spread to those lots
fronting Whispering Pines Lane on a front foot basis as a percentage of the total length of frontage along
Whispering Pines Lane. The formula is:
Assessment Per Parcel = Round ([(Total Assessment/2)*(% of Net Area)] + [(Total Assessment/2)*(%
of Whispering Pines Lane Frontage)])
Notwithstanding the foregoing method of apportionment, parcels numbered 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23 shall
receive zero assessments for the first year as shown in the second amended Engineer’s Report and each
of said parcels shall continue to receive no assessment until such time as the parcel is sold or developed.
Development shall be evidenced by issuance of a building permit; provided, however, that the issuance
of a building permit to reconstruct the sanctuary of the Whispering Pines Church of God located on
parcel numbers 19 and 20 shall not be construed to be development. At the time of sale or development
of each of said parcels, they shall thereafter be assessed in accordance with the method of apportionment
hereinabove set forth.
The total assessment for 2020/2021 was $24,996.80. Applying the inflation adjustment, the maximum
allowable assessment for 2021/2022 is $25,396.75. The actual total assessment will be $25396.60. Each
parcel’s assessment rate, as depicted in Part C was calculated by using the assessment per parcel formula
above which incorporates each parcel’s net area and length of Whispering Pines Lane frontage.

Page 59
H:\L&L\2021-22\Commercial\2122EngReport_Com L&L.docx

Item # 7.

ZONE 2 - Litton Business Park
The Litton Business Park was annexed into the 1988-1 Commercial L&L District in 1999. Although the
district was created after Proposition 218, the initial assessment per property has been adjusted annually
based on actual increases in utility and maintenance costs and the balance of the operational reserve
fund.
The initial assessment spread created a yearly assessment per development area of $480.00. It is the
intent that each development area of the entire project share equally in all Landscaping and Lighting
District expenses upon completion of said project. As future phases of this project are incorporated into
the Landscaping and Lighting District, the existing assessment area will be reassessed and new
assessment values will be calculated equally per development area. The assessment formula is:
Assessment Per Parcel =Round ((# of Development Areas) * (Total Assessment)) / (Total # of
Development Areas)
The annual maximum assessments shall be adjusted annually, as set forth hereinafter, based upon the
Consumer Price Indexes Pacific Cities and U.S. City Average as issued by the United States Department
of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics up to a maximum of $480.00 per the original assessment. The Base
Index to be used for subsequent annual adjustments (“Base Index”) shall be the Index published annually
in February (“Base Month”). The annual maximum assessment per lot, as defined in this report, shall
be adjusted every year based upon the cumulative increase, if any, in the Index as it stands on the Base
Month of each year over the Base Index. Any reduction or de-escalation in the Index from one year to
the next will not result in a reduction of the annual costs. The annual costs will be levied consistent with
the previous year.
The total assessment for 2020/2021 was $5,627.50. Applying the inflation adjustment, the maximum
allowable assessment for 2021/2022 is $5,717.54. The actual total assessment will be $5,717.10. Each
parcel’s assessment rate, as depicted in Part C was calculated by using the assessment per parcel formula
shown above which evenly distributes the assessment over the original number of parcels. Parcels
subdivided after the initial assessment pay a portion of the assessment based on percentage of area of the
original parcel.

Page 60
H:\L&L\2021-22\Commercial\2122EngReport_Com L&L.docx

Item # 7.

PART E
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The following pages are excerpts from the latest Assessor’s Parcel Maps of the County of Nevada
illustrating the approximate location, size and area of the benefiting parcels within the Landscaping and
Lighting District.

Page 61
H:\L&L\2021-22\Commercial\2122EngReport_Com L&L.docx

ZONE 1 WHISPERING PINES

Item # 7.

Page 62

ZONE 1 - WP

Item # 7.

Page 63

ZONE 1 - WP

Item # 7.

Page 64

ZONE 1 - WP

Item # 7.

Page 65

ZONE 2 - LITTON

Item # 7.

Page 66

ZONE 2 - LITTON

Item # 7.

Page 67

ZONE 2 - LITTON

Item # 7.

Page 68

ZONE 2 - LITTON

Item # 7.

Page 69

ZONE 2 - LITTON

Item # 7.

Page 70

ZONE 2 - LITTON

Item # 7.

Page 71

ZONE 2 - LITTON

Item # 7.

Page 72

Item # 7.

ENGINEER’S REPORT
RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1988-2

ANNUAL ASSESMENT 2021/2022

for

CITY OF GRASS VALLEY
NEVADA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Respectfully submitted, as directed by the City Council.

By:

_____________________
Timothy M. Kiser, P.E.
R.C.E. No. 58534

Page 73

City of Grass Valley
2020/2021 Engineer’s Report
Residential Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1988-2

Item # 7.

ENGINEER’S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1988-2
(Morgan Ranch, Ventana Sierra, Scotia Pines, Morgan Ranch West and Ridge Meadows)

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and
Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the _______ day of ______________,
2021.
___________________________________
City Clerk, City of Grass Valley
Nevada County, California

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and
Assessment Diagram thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City
of Grass Valley, California, on the _______ day of _________________, 2021.

___________________________________
City Clerk, City of Grass Valley
Nevada County, California

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and
Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Nevada
on the _______ day of ___________________, 2021.

___________________________________
City Clerk, City of Grass Valley
Nevada County, California

Page 74
H:\L&L\2021-22\Residential\2122EngReport_Res L&L.docx

City of Grass Valley
2020/2021 Engineer’s Report
Residential Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1988-2

Item # 7.

OVERVIEW
Timothy M. Kiser, Engineer of Work for Residential Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1988-2
(Zone I - Morgan Ranch, Zone II - Ventana Sierra Tract 90-03 Annexation No. 1993-1, and Zone III Scotia Pines Subdivision Annexation No. 30-A, Zone IV – Morgan Ranch West Annexation No. 20101, Zone V – Ridge Meadows Annexation 2016-1), City of Grass Valley, Nevada County, California
makes this report, as directed by City Council, pursuant to Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways
Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
The improvements which are the subject matter of this report are briefly described as follows:
Zone I - Morgan Ranch
The installation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping and associated improvements, as
delineated on the plans prepared by Josephine McProud, Landscape Architect, on file with the
City of Grass Valley, and modified by subsequent development, or changes instituted by the City
of Grass Valley in the routine administration of the district. Maintenance, in general, means the
furnishing of labor and materials for the ordinary upkeep and care of landscape areas including:
1. The repair, removal or replacement of any improvement.
2. Landscaping, including cultivation, weeding, mowing, pruning, tree removal, replanting,
spraying, fertilizing, and treating for disease.
3. Irrigation, including the operation, adjustment and repair of the irrigation system.
4. The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and solid waste.
Servicing means the furnishing and payment of:
1. Electric power for any public street light facilities or for the operation of any
improvements.
2. Water for the irrigation of any landscaping or the maintenance of any improvements.
Zone II - Ventana Sierra (Tract 90-03)
The installation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping and associated improvements, as
delineated on the plans prepared by Josephine McProud, Landscape Architect, on file with the
City of Grass Valley, and modified by subsequent development, or changes instituted by the City
of Grass Valley in the routine administration of the district. Maintenance, in general, means the
furnishing of labor and materials for the ordinary upkeep and care of landscape areas including:
1. The repair, removal or replacement of any improvement.
2. Landscaping, including cultivation, weeding, mowing, pruning, tree removal, replanting,
spraying, fertilizing, and treating for disease.
3. Irrigation, including the operation, adjustment and repair of the irrigation system.
4. The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and solid waste.
Servicing means the furnishing and payment of:
1. Electric power for any public street light facilities or for the operation of any
improvements.
2. Water for the irrigation of any landscaping or the maintenance of any improvements.
Zone III - Scotia Pines Subdivision

Page 75

City of Grass Valley
2020/2021 Engineer’s Report
Residential Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1988-2

Item # 7.

The installation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping and associated improvements of
Parcels A, B, C as delineated on Final Map 91-01, on file with the Nevada County Recorder’s
Office. Maintenance, in general, means the furnishing of labor and materials for the ordinary
upkeep and care of landscape areas including:
1. The repair, removal or replacement of any improvement.
2. Landscaping, including cultivation, weeding, mowing, pruning, tree removal, replanting,
spraying, fertilizing, and treating for disease.
3. The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and solid waste.
4. Mosquito abatement.
Servicing means the furnishing and payment of:
1. Electric power for any public street light facilities or for the operation of any
improvements.
2. Water for the irrigation of any landscaping or the maintenance of any improvements.
Zone IV – Morgan Ranch West
The installation, maintenance and servicing of public street light facilities including the
furnishing and payment of electric power.
Zone V – Ridge Meadows
The installation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping and associated improvements, as
delineated on the plans prepared by K. Clausen, Landscape Architect, on file with the City of
Grass Valley, and modified by subsequent development, or changes instituted by the City of
Grass Valley in the routine administration of the district. Maintenance, in general, means the
furnishing of labor and materials for the ordinary upkeep and care of landscape areas including:
1. The repair, removal or replacement of any improvement.
2. Landscaping, including cultivation, weeding, mowing, pruning, tree removal, replanting,
spraying, fertilizing, and treating for disease.
3. Irrigation, including the operation, adjustment and repair of the irrigation system.
4. The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and solid waste.
Servicing means the furnishing and payment of:
1. Electric power for any public street light facilities or for the operation of any
improvements.
2. Water for the irrigation of any landscaping or the maintenance of any improvements.

Page 76
H:\L&L\2021-22\Residential\2122EngReport_Res L&L.docx

City of Grass Valley
2020/2021 Engineer’s Report
Residential Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1988-2

Item # 7.

This report consists of five (5) parts, as follows:
PART A -

Plans and specifications for the improvements that are filed with the City Clerk.
Although separately bound, the plans and specifications are a part of this report
and are included in it by reference only.

PART B -

An estimate of the cost of the improvements for Fiscal Year 2021/2022.

PART C -

An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvement and levy on each
benefiting parcel of land within the district.

PART D -

The Method of Apportionment by which the undersigned has determined the
amount proposed to be levied on each parcel.

PART E -

A diagram showing all parcels of real property within this district. The diagram
is keyed to Part C by Assessor’s Parcel Number.

Page 77
H:\L&L\2021-22\Residential\2122EngReport_Res L&L.docx

City of Grass Valley
2020/2021 Engineer’s Report
Residential Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1988-2

Item # 7.

PART A
PLANS
Plans for the landscape, irrigation and street lighting for each zone have been prepared by a variety of
landscape architects and engineers. These Plans have been filed separately with the City Engineer’s
office and are incorporated in this Report by reference only as the initial improvements were completed
by separate contracts.
The following reference drawings are on file with the office of the City Engineer:
Zone I - Morgan Ranch, Landscape Plans (Dwg. No. 1560)
Zone II - Ventana Sierra, Landscape Plans (Dwg. No. 1689)
Zone III - Scotia Pines, Subdivision Map (Dwg. No. 1719)
Zone IV – Morgan Ranch West, Improvement Plans (Dwg. No. 2000)
Zone V – Ridge Meadows, Improvement and Landscape Plans (Dwg. No. 1453)

Page 78
H:\L&L\2021-22\Residential\2122EngReport_Res L&L.docx

City of Grass Valley
2020/2021 Engineer’s Report
Residential Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1988-2

Item # 7.

PART B
COST ESTIMATE
The estimated cost for the maintenance of improvements described in this report for the fiscal year 2021/2022 includes the use of reserve funds to provide
maintenance of the landscape areas and is as follows:

ZONE 1
(Morgan Ranch)

ZONE 2
(Ventana Sierra)

ZONE 3
(Scotia Pines)

ZONE 4
ZONE 5
(Morgan Ranch West) (Ridge Meadows)

COST INFORMATION
Maintenance Costs
Water and Electricity Servicing
County Administrative Fee
City Administration Costs

$15,000
$6,500
$300
$503

$2,000
$1,800
$110
$490

$7,400
$1,000
$230
$287

$3,500
$100
$220
$180

$12,000
$550
$220
$524

Total Direct and Admin Costs

$22,303

$4,400

$8,917

$4,000

$13,294

ASSESSMENT INFORMATION
Direct Costs
Reserve Collections/ (Transfer)

$22,303
$2,500

$4,400
($1,300)

$8,917
($5,000)

$4,000
($3,500)

$13,294
($4,150)

Net Total Assessment

$24,803

$3,100

$3,917

$500

$9,144

FUND BALANCE
INFORMATION
Projected Reserve After FY
2020/2021
Interest Earnings
Reserve Fund Adjustments

$19,687

$7,395

$9,748

$8,637

$18,741

$30
$2,500

$40
($1,300)

$30
($5,000)

$10
($3,500)

$40
($4,150)

Projected Reserve at End of Year

$22,217

$6,135

$4,778

$5,147

$14,631
Page 79

5/28/2021
Item # 7.

PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Zone 1 - Morgan Ranch Subdivision
FISCAL
YEAR

TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
GOAL
$24,804.40

2021/2022

MAX
ASSESSMENT
Last Year + 1.6% CPI
$24,805.36

TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
$24,802.56

.
Percent of
Undeveloped Land
or No. of Dwelling Units
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Levy
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59

Assessor Parcel No.
008-060-048
008-060-049
008-060-050
008-060-051
008-060-052
008-060-053
008-861-001
008-861-002
008-861-003
008-861-004
008-861-005
008-861-006
008-861-007
008-861-008
008-861-010
008-861-011
008-861-012
008-861-013
008-861-014
008-861-015
008-861-016
008-861-017
008-861-018
008-861-020
008-861-021
008-861-022
008-861-023
008-861-024
008-861-025
008-861-026
008-861-027
008-861-028
008-861-029
008-861-030
008-861-031
008-861-032
008-861-033
008-861-034
008-861-035
008-861-036

Tax
Area
1st
2nd
Code
Installment
Installment
01056
$32.30
$32.30
01056
$32.30
$32.30
01056
$32.30
$32.30
01056
$32.30
$32.30
01056
$32.30
$32.30
01056
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01061
$32.30
$32.30
01056
$32.30
$32.30
01056
$32.30
$32.30
Page 80

H:\L&L\2021-22\Residential\2122Assessment Roll Levy_Res

Zone 1 - Page 1

5/28/2021
Item # 7.

PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Zone 1 - Morgan Ranch Subdivision
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59

008-861-037
008-861-038
008-861-039
008-861-040
008-880-001
008-880-002
008-880-003
008-880-004
008-880-005
008-880-006
008-880-007
008-880-008
008-880-009
008-880-010
008-880-011
008-880-012
008-880-013
008-880-014
008-880-015
008-880-016
008-880-017
008-880-018
008-880-019
008-880-020
008-880-021
008-880-022
008-880-023
008-880-024
008-880-025
008-880-026
008-880-027
008-880-028
008-880-029
008-880-030
008-880-031
008-880-032
008-880-033
008-880-034
008-880-035
008-880-036
008-880-037
008-890-001
008-890-002
008-890-003
008-890-004
008-890-005
008-890-006
008-890-007
008-890-008
008-890-009

01056
01056
01056
01056
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061

$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30

$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
Page 81

H:\L&L\2021-22\Residential\2122Assessment Roll Levy_Res

Zone 1 - Page 2

5/28/2021
Item # 7.

PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Zone 1 - Morgan Ranch Subdivision
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59

008-890-010
008-890-011
008-890-012
008-890-017
008-890-018
008-890-019
008-890-021
008-890-022
008-890-023
008-890-024
008-890-025
008-890-026
008-890-027
008-890-028
008-890-029
008-890-030
008-890-031
008-890-032
008-890-033
008-890-034
008-890-035
008-890-036
008-890-037
008-920-001
008-920-008
008-920-009
008-920-010
008-920-011
008-920-012
008-920-013
008-920-014
008-920-015
008-920-016
008-920-017
008-920-018
008-920-019
008-920-020
008-920-021
008-920-022
008-920-023
008-920-024
008-920-025
008-920-026
008-920-027
008-920-028
008-920-031
008-920-032
008-920-033
008-920-034
008-920-035

01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061

$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30

$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
Page 82

H:\L&L\2021-22\Residential\2122Assessment Roll Levy_Res

Zone 1 - Page 3

5/28/2021
Item # 7.

PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Zone 1 - Morgan Ranch Subdivision
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59

008-931-001
008-931-002
008-931-003
008-931-004
008-931-005
008-931-006
008-931-007
008-931-008
008-931-009
008-931-010
008-931-011
008-931-012
008-931-013
008-931-014
008-931-015
008-931-016
008-931-017
008-931-018
008-931-019
008-931-020
008-931-021
008-931-022
008-931-023
008-931-024
008-931-025
008-931-026
008-931-027
008-931-028
008-931-029
008-931-030
008-931-031
008-931-032
008-931-033
008-931-034
008-931-035
008-931-036
008-931-037
008-931-038
008-931-039
008-931-040
008-931-041
008-931-042
008-931-043
008-931-044
008-931-045
008-931-046
008-931-047
008-931-048
008-931-049
008-931-050

01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061

$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30

$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
Page 83

H:\L&L\2021-22\Residential\2122Assessment Roll Levy_Res

Zone 1 - Page 4

5/28/2021
Item # 7.

PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Zone 1 - Morgan Ranch Subdivision
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59

008-931-051
008-931-052
008-931-053
008-931-054
008-931-055
008-931-056
008-931-057
008-932-001
008-932-002
008-932-003
008-932-004
008-932-005
008-932-006
008-932-007
008-932-008
008-932-009
008-932-010
008-932-011
008-932-012
008-932-013
008-932-014
008-932-015
008-932-016
008-932-017
008-932-018
008-932-019
008-932-020
008-932-021
008-932-022
008-932-023
008-932-024
008-932-025
008-932-026
008-932-027
008-932-028
008-932-029
008-932-030
008-932-031
008-932-032
008-932-033
008-932-034
008-932-035
008-932-036
008-932-037
008-932-038
008-950-003
008-950-004
008-950-005
008-950-006
008-950-007

01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061

$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30

$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
Page 84

H:\L&L\2021-22\Residential\2122Assessment Roll Levy_Res

Zone 1 - Page 5

5/28/2021
Item # 7.

PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Zone 1 - Morgan Ranch Subdivision
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59

008-950-008
008-950-009
008-950-010
008-950-011
008-950-012
008-950-013
008-950-014
008-950-015
008-950-016
008-950-017
008-950-018
008-950-019
008-950-020
008-950-021
008-950-022
008-950-023
008-950-024
008-950-025
008-950-026
008-950-027
008-950-028
008-950-037
008-950-038
008-950-039
008-950-040
008-950-041
008-950-042
008-950-043
008-950-044
008-950-045
008-950-046
008-950-047
008-950-048
008-950-049
008-950-050
008-950-051
008-950-055
008-950-058
008-950-060
008-950-061
008-950-062
008-950-063
008-950-064
008-950-065
008-950-066
008-950-067
008-950-068
008-950-069
008-950-070
008-950-071

01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01056
01056
01056
01056
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061

$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30

$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
Page 85

H:\L&L\2021-22\Residential\2122Assessment Roll Levy_Res

Zone 1 - Page 6

5/28/2021
Item # 7.

PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Zone 1 - Morgan Ranch Subdivision
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59
$64.59

008-950-072
008-950-073
008-950-074
008-950-075
008-950-076
008-960-003
008-960-004
008-960-005
008-960-006
008-960-007
008-960-008
008-960-010
008-960-014
008-960-015
008-960-016
008-960-017
008-960-018
008-960-019
008-960-020
008-960-021
008-960-022
008-960-023
008-960-024
008-960-028
008-960-029
008-960-030
008-960-031
008-960-032
008-960-033
008-960-034
008-960-040
008-960-041
008-960-042
008-960-043
008-960-044
897002
897003
897004
897005
897006
897007
897008
897009
897010
897011
897012
897014
897015
897016
897017

01061
01061
01056
01056
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056

$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30

$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
Page 86

H:\L&L\2021-22\Residential\2122Assessment Roll Levy_Res

Zone 1 - Page 7

5/28/2021
Item # 7.

PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Zone 1 - Morgan Ranch Subdivision
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
384

$64.59
897018
01056
$64.59
897019
01056
$64.59
897020
01056
$64.59
897021
01056
$64.59
897022
01056
$64.59
897023
01056
$64.59
897024
01056
$64.59
897025
01056
$64.59
897026
01056
$64.59
897027
01056
$64.59
897028
01056
$64.59
897029
01056
$64.59
897030
01056
$64.59
897031
01056
$64.59
897032
01056
$64.59
897033
01056
$64.59
897034
01056
$64.59
897036
01061
$64.59
897037
01061
$64.59
897039
01061
$64.59
897040
01056
$64.59
897041
01056
$64.59
897042
01056
$64.59
897043
01056
$64.59
897044
01056
$64.59
897045
01056
$64.59
897046
01056
$64.59
897047
01056
$64.59
897048
01056
$64.59
897049
01056
$64.59
897050
01056
$64.59
897051
01056
$64.59
897052
01056
$64.59
897053
01056
$64.59
897054
01056
$64.59
897055
01056
$64.59
897056
01056
$64.59
897057
01056
$64.59
897058
01056
$64.59
897059
01056
$64.59
897060
01056
$64.59
897061
01056
$64.59
897062
01056
$64.59
897063
01056
$24,802.56 Subtotal - Developed Land

$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$12,401.28

$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$32.30
$12,401.28

Page 87

H:\L&L\2021-22\Residential\2122Assessment Roll Levy_Res

Zone 1 - Page 8

Item # 7.

5/28/2021

PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Zone 2 - Ventana Sierra (Tract 90-03)
FISCAL
YEAR
2021/2022
Number
of Dwelling
Units
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
19

TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
GOAL
$3,100.00

MAX
ASSESSMENT
Last Year + 1.6% CPI
$3,149.64

Levy

Assessor Parcel No.
163.16
004-630-002
163.16
004-630-003
163.16
004-630-004
163.16
004-630-005
163.16
004-630-006
163.16
004-630-007
163.16
004-630-008
163.16
004-630-009
163.16
004-630-010
163.16
004-630-011
163.16
004-630-012
163.16
004-630-013
163.16
004-630-014
163.16
004-630-015
163.16
004-630-016
163.16
004-630-017
163.16
004-630-020
163.16
004-630-021
163.16
004-630-023
$3,100.04

H:\L&L\2021-22\Residential\2122Assessment Roll Levy_Res

TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
$3,100.04
Tax
Area
Code
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061
01061

1st
2nd
Installment
Installment
--------------------81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
81.58
$1,550.02
$1,550.02

Zone 2 - Page 9

Page 88

Item # 7.

5/28/2021

PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Zone 3 - Scotia Pines Subdivision
FISCAL
YEAR
2021/2022

TOTAL
MAX
ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT
GOAL
Last Year + 1.6% CPI
$3,917.19
$3,917.19

Number
of Dwelling
Units
-

Levy
-

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Assessor Parcel No.
71.22
029-330-001
71.22
029-330-002
71.22
029-330-003
71.22
029-330-005
71.22
029-330-006
71.22
029-330-007
71.22
029-330-008
71.22
029-330-009
71.22
029-330-010
71.22
029-330-011
71.22
029-330-012
71.22
029-330-013
71.22
029-330-014
71.22
029-330-015
71.22
029-330-016
71.22
029-330-017
71.22
029-330-018
71.22
029-330-019
71.22
029-330-020
71.22
029-330-021
71.22
029-330-022
71.22
029-330-023
71.22
029-330-024
71.22
029-330-026
71.22
029-330-027
71.22
029-330-030
71.22
029-330-031
71.22
029-330-032
71.22
029-330-033
71.22
029-330-034
71.22
029-330-035
71.22
029-330-036
71.22
029-330-037
71.22
029-330-038
71.22
029-330-039
71.22
029-330-040

H:\L&L\2021-22\Residential\2122Assessment Roll Levy_Res

TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
$3,917.10

Tax
Area
Code

1st
Installment

-

2nd
Installment
-

01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000

35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61

35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61

Zone 3 - Page 10

Page 89

Item # 7.

5/28/2021

PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Zone 3 - Scotia Pines Subdivision
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
55

71.22
71.22
71.22
71.22
71.22
71.22
71.22
71.22
71.22
71.22
71.22
71.22
71.22
71.22
71.22
71.22
71.22
71.22
71.22
$3,917.10

029-330-041
029-330-042
029-330-043
029-330-044
029-330-047
029-330-048
029-330-049
029-330-050
029-330-051
029-330-052
029-330-053
029-330-054
029-330-055
029-330-056
029-330-061
029-330-062
029-330-064
029-330-065
029-330-066

H:\L&L\2021-22\Residential\2122Assessment Roll Levy_Res

01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000

35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
$1,958.55

35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
35.61
$1,958.55

Zone 3 - Page 11

Page 90

5/28/2021
Item # 7.

PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Zone 4 - Morgan Ranch West
FISCAL
YEAR

TOTAL
MAX
ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT
GOAL
Last Year + 1.6% CPI
$500.00
$515.50

2021/2022

Number
of Dwelling
Units
-

$500.00

Tax
Area
Code

Levy
-

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
25

Assessor Parcel No.
20.00
004-660-002
20.00
004-660-003
20.00
004-660-004
20.00
004-660-005
20.00
004-660-006
20.00
004-660-007
20.00
004-660-008
20.00
004-660-009
20.00
004-660-010
20.00
004-660-011
20.00
004-660-012
20.00
004-660-013
20.00
004-660-014
20.00
004-660-015
20.00
004-660-016
20.00
004-660-017
20.00
004-660-018
20.00
004-660-019
20.00
004-660-020
20.00
004-660-021
20.00
004-660-022
20.00
004-660-023
20.00
004-660-024
20.00
004-660-029
20.00
004-660-027
$500.00

TOTAL
ASSESSMENT

1st
Installment

-

H:\L&L\2021-22\Residential\2122Assessment Roll Levy_Res

2nd
Installment
-

01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056

10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
$250.00

10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
$250.00

Page 91

Zone 4 - Page 12

5/28/2021
Item # 7.

PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Zone 5 - Ridge Meadows
FISCAL
YEAR

TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
GOAL
$9,144.18

2021/2022

Number
of Dwelling
Units
-

Assessor Parcel No.
247.14
008-980-001
247.14
008-980-002
247.14
008-980-003
247.14
008-980-004
247.14
008-980-005
247.14
008-980-006
247.14
008-980-007
247.14
008-980-008
247.14
008-980-009
247.14
008-980-010
247.14
008-980-011
247.14
008-980-012
247.14
008-980-013
247.14
008-980-014
247.14
008-980-015
247.14
008-980-016
247.14
008-980-017
247.14
008-980-018
247.14
008-980-019
247.14
008-980-020
247.14
008-980-021
247.14
008-980-022
247.14
008-980-023
247.14
008-980-024
247.14
008-980-025
247.14
008-980-026
247.14
008-980-027
247.14
008-980-028
247.14
008-980-029
247.14
008-980-030
247.14
008-980-031
247.14
008-980-032
247.14
008-980-033
247.14
008-980-034
247.14
008-980-035
247.14
008-980-036
247.14
008-980-037
$9,144.18

TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
$9,144.18

Tax
Area
Code

Levy
-

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
37

MAX
ASSESSMENT
Last Yr + 1.6%
$9,290.49

1st
Installment

-

H:\L&L\2021-22\Residential\2122Assessment Roll Levy_Res

2nd
Installment
-

01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056

123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
$4,572.09

123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
123.57
$4,572.09

Page 92

Zone 5 - Page 13

City of Grass Valley
2020/2021 Engineer’s Report
Residential Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1988-2

Item # 7.

PART D
METHOD OF APPORTIONING
In order to maintain sufficient funding for the Districts, assessments will be adjusted annually by the
Consumer Price Indexes (CPI) Pacific Cities and U.S. City Average for February of the year of
calculation All Items Indexes for the West. The corresponding CPI for February 2020 was 1.6%.
ZONE I - Morgan Ranch
The Morgan Ranch Subdivision was annexed into the 1988-2 Residential L&L District in 1996. Because
the district was created before Proposition 218, the initial assessment per dwelling unit of $87.00 has
been adjusted annually based on actual increases in utility and maintenance costs and the balance of the
operational reserve fund. Per the formation documents, it is the intent that each dwelling unit of the
project shares equally in all expenses of Zone I.
The annual maximum assessments shall be adjusted annually, as set forth hereinafter, based upon the
Consumer Price Indexes Pacific Cities and U.S. City Average as issued by the United States Department
of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. The Base Index to be used for subsequent annual adjustments
(“Base Index”) shall be the Index published annually in February (“Base Month”). The annual maximum
assessment per lot, as defined in this report, shall be adjusted every year based upon the cumulative
increase, if any, in the Index as it stands on the Base Month of each year over the Base Index. Any
reduction or de-escalation in the Index from one year to the next will not result in a reduction of the
annual costs. The annual costs will be levied consistent with the previous year. The assessment formula
is:
Assessment Per Parcel = Round (Total Assessment / # of Parcels)
Therefore, based on the total build-out number of parcels as of 6/1/21, and the total assessment needed
for FY 2021/2022, the levy will be increased $1.02 per dwelling unit to $64.60 per dwelling unit in
accordance with the Consumer Price Index.
The total assessment for 2020/2021 was $24,414.72. Applying the inflation adjustment, the maximum
allowable assessment for 2021/2022 is $24,805.36. The actual total assessment will be $24,802.56. Each
parcel’s assessment rate, as depicted in Part C was calculated by using the assessment per parcel formula
shown above which evenly distributes the assessment over the number of parcels.
ZONE II - Ventana Sierra (Tract 90-03)
The Ventana Sierra Subdivision was annexed into the 1988-2 Residential L&L District in 1993. Because
the district was created before Proposition 218, the initial assessment per dwelling unit of $190.00 has
been adjusted annually based on actual increases in utility and maintenance costs and the balance of the
operational reserve fund. Per the formation documents, it is the intent that each dwelling unit of the
project shares equally in all expenses of Zone II.
The annual maximum assessments shall be adjusted annually, as set forth hereinafter, based upon the
Consumer Price Indexes Pacific Cities and U.S. City Average as issued by the United States Department
of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. The Base Index to be used for subsequent annual adjustments
(“Base Index”) shall be the Index published annually in February (“Base Month”). The annual maximum
Page 93

City of Grass Valley
2020/2021 Engineer’s Report
Residential Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1988-2

Item # 7.

assessment per lot, as defined in this report, shall be adjusted every year based upon the cumulative
increase, if any, in the Index as it stands on the Base Month of each year over the Base Index. Any
reduction or de-escalation in the Index from one year to the next will not result in a reduction of the
annual costs. The annual costs will be levied consistent with the previous year. The assessment formula
is:
Assessment Per Parcel = Round (Total Assessment / # of Parcels)
Therefore, based on the total number of parcels in Ventana Sierra as of 6/1/21 and the total assessment
needed for FY 2021/2022, the levy will remain unchanged at $163.16 per dwelling unit.
The total annual assessment for 2020/2021 was $3,100.04. Applying the inflation adjustment, the
maximum allowable assessment for 2021/2022 is $3,196.14. The actual total assessment will be
$3,100.04. Each parcel’s assessment rate, as depicted in Part C was calculated by using the assessment
per parcel formula shown above which evenly distributes the assessment over the number of parcels.
ZONE III - Scotia Pines Subdivision
The Scotia Pines Subdivision created the 1988-2 Residential L&L District in 1988. Because the district
was created before Proposition 218, the initial assessment per dwelling unit of $66.27 has been adjusted
annually based on actual increases in utility and maintenance costs and the balance of the operational
reserve fund. Per the formation documents, it is the intent that each dwelling unit of the project shares
equally in all expenses of Zone III.
The annual maximum assessments shall be adjusted annually, as set forth hereinafter, based upon the
Consumer Price Indexes Pacific Cities and U.S. City Average as issued by the United States Department
of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. The Base Index to be used for subsequent annual adjustments
(“Base Index”) shall be the Index published annually in February (“Base Month”). The annual maximum
assessment per lot, as defined in this report, shall be adjusted every year based upon the cumulative
increase, if any, in the Index as it stands on the Base Month of each year over the Base Index. Any
reduction or de-escalation in the Index from one year to the next will not result in a reduction of the
annual costs. The annual costs will be levied consistent with the previous year. The assessment formula
is:
Assessment Per Parcel = Round (Total Assessment / # of Parcels)
Therefore, based on the total number of parcels in Scotia Pines as of 6/1/21 and the total assessment
needed for FY 2021/2022, the levy will be increased $1.12 per dwelling unit to $71.22 per dwelling unit
in accordance with the CPI.
The total annual assessment for 2020/2021 was $3,855.50. Applying the inflation adjustment, the
maximum allowable assessment for 2021/2022 is $3,917.19. The actual total assessment will be
$3,917.10. Each parcel’s assessment rate, as depicted in Part C was calculated by using the assessment
per parcel formula shown above which evenly distributes the assessment over the number of parcels.
ZONE IV - Morgan Ranch West
General Benefit
The street lights in Morgan Ranch West and the maintenance of those street lights are of entirely local
Page 94
H:\L&L\2021-22\Residential\2122EngReport_Res L&L.docx

City of Grass Valley
2020/2021 Engineer’s Report
Residential Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1988-2

Item # 7.

and special benefit to the parcels in Morgan Ranch West, and no general benefits are provided by them.
The street lighting services funded by the District constitute residential street lighting which provides
safety lighting and sidewalk and parking illumination for the special benefit of assessed parcels.
Apportionment of Special Benefits
The initial assessment spread created a yearly assessment per dwelling unit of $51.08. It is the intent
that each dwelling unit of the project shares equally in all expenses upon completion of Zone IV.
Therefore, based on the total build-out number of parcels as of 6/1/21, and the total assessment needed
for FY 2021/2022, the levy will remain unchanged at $20.00 per dwelling unit.
The annual maximum assessments shall be adjusted annually, as set forth hereinafter, based upon the
Consumer Price Indexes Pacific Cities and U.S. City Average as issued by the United States Department
of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. The Base Index to be used for subsequent annual adjustments
(“Base Index”) shall be the Index published annually in February (“Base Month”). The annual maximum
assessment per lot, as defined in this report, shall be adjusted every year based upon the cumulative
increase, if any, in the Index as it stands on the Base Month of each year over the Base Index. Any
reduction or de-escalation in the Index from one year to the next will not result in a reduction of the
annual costs. The annual costs will be levied consistent with the previous year. The assessment formula
is:
Assessment Per Parcel = Round (Total Assessment / # of Parcels)
When, in any fiscal year, the operational reserve fund is at a level equal to half of the following fiscal
year’s costs, any surplus in the ability to cover all assessed costs will be used as a credit to the levy for
such fiscal year and individual assessments will be reduced proportionately.
The total annual assessment for 2020/2021 was $500. Applying the inflation adjustment, the maximum
allowable assessment for 2021/2022 is $515.50. The actual total assessment will be $500.00. Each
parcel’s assessment rate, as depicted in Part C was calculated by using the assessment per parcel formula
shown above which evenly distributes the assessment over the number of parcels.
ZONE V – Ridge Meadows
General Benefit
The landscaping, irrigation and street lights in Ridge Meadows and the maintenance of the landscaping,
irrigation and street lights are of entirely local and special benefit to the parcels in Ridge Meadows, and
no general benefits are provided by them. The street lighting services funded by the District constitute
residential street lighting which provides safety lighting and sidewalk and parking illumination for the
special benefit of assessed parcels.
Apportionment of Special Benefits
The initial assessment spread creates a yearly assessment per dwelling unit of $239.72. It is the intent
that each dwelling unit of the project shares equally in all expenses upon completion of Zone V.
Therefore, based on the total build-out number of parcels as of 6/1/21, and the total assessment needed
for FY 2021/2022, the levy will remain unchanged at $247.14 per dwelling unit.
Page 95
H:\L&L\2021-22\Residential\2122EngReport_Res L&L.docx

City of Grass Valley
2020/2021 Engineer’s Report
Residential Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1988-2

Item # 7.

The annual maximum assessments shall be adjusted annually, as set forth hereinafter, based upon the
Consumer Price Indexes Pacific Cities and U.S. City Average as issued by the United States Department
of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. The Base Index to be used for subsequent annual adjustments
(“Base Index”) shall be the Index published annually in February (“Base Month”). The annual maximum
assessment per lot, as defined in this report, shall be adjusted every year based upon the cumulative
increase, if any, in the Index as it stands on the Base Month of each year over the Base Index. Any
reduction or de-escalation in the Index from one year to the next will not result in a reduction of the
annual costs. The annual costs will be levied consistent with the previous year. The assessment formula
is:
Assessment Per Parcel = Round (Total Assessment / # of Parcels)
When, in any fiscal year, the operational reserve fund is at a level equal to half of the following fiscal
year’s costs, any surplus in the ability to cover all assessed costs will be used as a credit to the levy for
such fiscal year and individual assessments will be reduced proportionately.
The total annual assessment for 2020/2021 was $9,144.18. Applying the inflation adjustment, the
maximum allowable assessment for 2021/2022 is $9,290.49. The actual total assessment will be
$9,144.18. Each parcel’s assessment rate, as depicted in Part C was calculated by using the assessment
per parcel formula shown above which evenly distributes the assessment over the number of parcels.

Page 96
H:\L&L\2021-22\Residential\2122EngReport_Res L&L.docx

City of Grass Valley
2020/2021 Engineer’s Report
Residential Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1988-2

Item # 7.

PART E
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The following pages are excerpts from the latest Assessor’s Parcel Maps of the County of Nevada
illustrating the approximate location, size and area of the benefiting parcels within the Landscaping and
Lighting District.

Page 97
H:\L&L\2021-22\Residential\2122EngReport_Res L&L.docx

Item # 7.

ZONE 1

Page 98

Item # 7.

ZONE 1

Page 99

Item # 7.

ZONE 1

Page 100

Item # 7.

ZONE 1

Page 101

Item # 7.

ZONE 1

Page 102

Item # 7.

ZONE 1

Page 103

Item # 7.

ZONE 1

Page 104

Item # 7.

ZONE 1

Page 105

Item # 7.

ZONE 1

Page 106

ZONE 2

Item # 7.

Page 107

ZONE 3

Item # 7.

Page 108

ZONE 4

Item # 7.

Page 109

ZONE 5

Item # 7.

Page 110

Item # 7.

ENGINEER’S REPORT
MORGAN RANCH UNIT 7 BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2003-1

ANNUAL ASSESMENT 2021/2022

for

CITY OF GRASS VALLEY
NEVADA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Respectfully submitted, as directed by the City Council.

By:

_____________________
Timothy M. Kiser, P.E.
R.C.E. No. 58534

Page 111

City of Grass Valley
2021/2022 Engineer’s Report
Morgan Ranch Unit 7 Benefit Assessment District No. 2010-1

Item # 7.

ENGINEER’S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
BENFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2003-1
(Morgan Ranch Unit 7)

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and
Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the _______ day of ______________,
2021.
___________________________________
City Clerk, City of Grass Valley
Nevada County, California

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and
Assessment Diagram thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City
of Grass Valley, California, on the _______ day of _________________, 2021.

___________________________________
City Clerk, City of Grass Valley
Nevada County, California

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and
Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Nevada
on the _______ day of ___________________, 2021.

___________________________________
City Clerk, City of Grass Valley
Nevada County, California

Page 112
H:\BAD\MR Unit7\2122\EngReport_MR Unit7.docx

City of Grass Valley
2021/2022 Engineer’s Report
Morgan Ranch Unit 7 Benefit Assessment District No. 2010-1

Item # 7.

OVERVIEW
Timothy M. Kiser, Engineer of Work for Morgan Ranch Unit 7 Benefit Assessment District No. 20031, City of Grass Valley, Nevada County, California makes this report, as directed by City Council,
pursuant to Section 54715 of the Government Code (Benefit Assessment District of 1982).
The improvements which are the subject matter of this report are briefly described as follows:
Morgan Ranch Unit 7
The maintenance, operation and servicing of drainage improvements, as delineated on plans
prepared by Nevada City Engineering, on file with the City of Grass Valley, and modified by
subsequent development, or changes instituted by the City of Grass Valley in the routine
administration of the district, including the maintenance, operations, and servicing of the
drainage improvements.
This report consists of five (5) parts, as follows:
PART A Plans and specifications for the improvements that are filed with
the City Clerk. Although separately bound, the plans and specifications are a part
of this report and are included in it by reference only.
PART B 2021/2022.

An estimate of the cost of the improvements for Fiscal Year

PART C An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvement and levy
on each benefiting parcel of land within the district.
PART D The Method of Apportionment by which the undersigned has
determined the amount proposed to be levied on each parcel.
PART E A diagram showing all parcels of real property within this district.
The diagram is keyed to Part C by Assessor’s Parcel Number.

Page 113
H:\BAD\MR Unit7\2122\EngReport_MR Unit7.docx

City of Grass Valley
2021/2022 Engineer’s Report
Morgan Ranch Unit 7 Benefit Assessment District No. 2010-1

Item # 7.

PART A
PLANS
Plans and specifications for the drainage improvements have been prepared by Nevada City Engineering.
These Plans and Specifications have been filed separately with the City Clerk and the City Engineer’s
office and are incorporated in this Report by reference only; the initial improvements were completed
by separate contracts.
The following reference drawings are on file with the office of the City Engineer:
Morgan Ranch - Unit 7 Plans (Dwg No. 1892)

Page 114
H:\BAD\MR Unit7\2122\EngReport_MR Unit7.docx

City of Grass Valley
2021/2022 Engineer’s Report
Morgan Ranch Unit 7 Benefit Assessment District No. 2010-1

Item # 7.

PART B
COST ESTIMATE
The estimated cost for the maintenance of improvements described in this Report for the fiscal year 2021/2022
includes the use of reserve funds to provide maintenance to the detention basins and is as follows:

Morgan Ranch Unit 7
COST INFORMATION
Direct Maintenance Costs
County Administrative Fee
City Administration Costs

$10,000
$215
$265

Total Direct and Admin Costs

$10,480

ASSESSMENT INFORMATION
Direct Costs
Reserve Collections/ (Transfer)

$10,480
($10,000)

Net Total Assessment

$480

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION
Projected Reserve After FY 2020/2021
Interest Earnings
Reserve Fund Adjustments

$19,646
$65
($10,000)

Projected Reserve at End of Year

$9,711

Page 115
H:\BAD\MR Unit7\2122\EngReport_MR Unit7.docx

Item # 7.

6/2/2021

PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Morgan Ranch - Unit 7 Subdivision
FISCAL
YEAR

TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
GOAL
$480.00

2021/22
Percent of
Undeveloped Land
or No. of Dwelling Units

MAX
ASSESSMENT
Last Year + 1.6% CPI
$1,219.20

TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
$480.00
Tax
Area
Code

Assessor Parcel No.

Levy

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00

24

$480.00 Subtotal - Developed Land

H:\BAD\MR Unit7\2122\Part C Assessment

008-970-040
008-970-041
008-970-042
008-970-043
008-970-044
008-970-045
008-970-046
008-970-047
008-970-048
008-970-049
008-970-050
008-970-051
008-970-052
008-970-053
008-970-054
008-970-055
008-970-056
008-970-057
008-970-058
008-970-059
008-970-060
008-970-061
008-970-062
008-970-063

01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056

1st
Installment

2nd
Installment

$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00

$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00
$10.00

$240.00

$240.00

Page 1

Page 116

City of Grass Valley
2021/2022 Engineer’s Report
Morgan Ranch Unit 7 Benefit Assessment District No. 2010-1

Item # 7.

PART D
METHOD OF APPORTIONING
In order to maintain sufficient funding for the Districts, assessments will be adjusted annually by the
Consumer Price Indexes (CPI) Pacific Cities and U.S. City Average for February of the year of
calculation All Items Indexes for the West. The corresponding CPI for February 2021 was 1.6%.
Morgan Ranch Unit 7
The initial assessment spread created a yearly assessment per dwelling unit of $84.29. It is the intent
that each dwelling unit of the entire project share equally in all expenses upon completion.
The 2020/2021 assessment was $1,200. Applying the inflation adjustment, the maximum allowable
assessment for 2021/2022 is $1,219.20. The actual total assessment will be decreased to $480.00. Based
on the total build-out number of parcels and the total assessment needed, the FY 2021/2022 levy will be
decreased by $30.00 per dwelling unit to $20.00 per dwelling unit.
The assessment formula is:
Assessment Per Parcel = Round (Total Assessment / # of Parcels)

Page 117
H:\BAD\MR Unit7\2122\EngReport_MR Unit7.docx

City of Grass Valley
2021/2022 Engineer’s Report
Morgan Ranch Unit 7 Benefit Assessment District No. 2010-1

Item # 7.

PART E
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The following pages are excerpts from the latest Assessor’s Parcel Maps of the County of Nevada
illustrating the approximate location, size and area of the benefiting parcels within the Benefit
Assessment District.

Page 118
H:\BAD\MR Unit7\2122\EngReport_MR Unit7.docx

Item # 7.

Page 119

Item # 7.

ENGINEER’S REPORT
MORGAN RANCH WEST BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2010-1

ANNUAL ASSESMENT 2021/2022

for

CITY OF GRASS VALLEY
NEVADA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Respectfully submitted, as directed by the City Council.

By:

_____________________
Timothy M. Kiser, P.E.
R.C.E. No. 58534

Page 120

City of Grass Valley
2021/2022 Engineer’s Report
Morgan Ranch West Benefit Assessment District No. 2010-1

Item # 7.

ENGINEER’S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
BENFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2010-1
(Morgan Ranch West)

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and
Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the _______ day of ______________,
2021.
___________________________________
City Clerk, City of Grass Valley
Nevada County, California

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and
Assessment Diagram thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City
of Grass Valley, California, on the _______ day of _________________, 2021.

___________________________________
City Clerk, City of Grass Valley
Nevada County, California

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and
Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Nevada
on the _______ day of ___________________, 2021.

___________________________________
City Clerk, City of Grass Valley
Nevada County, California

Page 121
H:\BAD\MR West\2122\2122EngReport_MR West BAD.docx

City of Grass Valley
2021/2022 Engineer’s Report
Morgan Ranch West Benefit Assessment District No. 2010-1

Item # 7.

OVERVIEW
Timothy M. Kiser, Engineer of Work for Morgan Ranch West Benefit Assessment District No. 2010-1,
City of Grass Valley, Nevada County, California makes this report, as directed by City Council, pursuant
to Section 54715 of the Government Code (Benefit Assessment District of 1982).
The improvements which are the subject matter of this report are briefly described as follows:
Morgan Ranch West
The maintenance, operation and servicing of drainage improvements, as delineated on plans
prepared by Nevada City Engineering, on file with the City of Grass Valley, and modified by
subsequent development, or changes instituted by the City of Grass Valley in the routine
administration of the district, including the maintenance, operations, and servicing of the
drainage improvements.
This report consists of five (5) parts, as follows:
PART A Plans and specifications for the improvements that are filed with
the City Clerk. Although separately bound, the plans and specifications are a part
of this report and are included in it by reference only.
PART B 2021/2022.

An estimate of the cost of the improvements for Fiscal Year

PART C An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvement and levy
on each benefiting parcel of land within the district.
PART D The Method of Apportionment by which the undersigned has
determined the amount proposed to be levied on each parcel.
PART E A diagram showing all parcels of real property within this district.
The diagram is keyed to Part C by Assessor’s Parcel Number.

Page 122
H:\BAD\MR West\2122\2122EngReport_MR West BAD.docx

City of Grass Valley
2021/2022 Engineer’s Report
Morgan Ranch West Benefit Assessment District No. 2010-1

Item # 7.

PART A
PLANS
Plans for the landscape, irrigation and street lighting for each zone have been prepared by a variety of
landscape architects and engineers. These Plans have been filed separately with the City Engineer’s
office and are incorporated in this Report by reference only as the initial improvements were completed
by separate contracts.
The following reference drawings are on file with the office of the City Engineer:
Morgan Ranch West Improvement Plans (Dwg No. 2000)

Page 123
H:\BAD\MR West\2122\2122EngReport_MR West BAD.docx

City of Grass Valley
2021/2022 Engineer’s Report
Morgan Ranch West Benefit Assessment District No. 2010-1

Item # 7.

PART B
COST ESTIMATE
The estimated cost for the maintenance of improvements described in this Report for the fiscal year 2021/2022
includes the use of reserve funds to provide maintenance to the detention basins and is as follows:

Morgan Ranch West
COST INFORMATION
Direct Maintenance Costs
County Administrative Fee
City Administration Costs

$5,260
$215
$275

Total Direct and Admin Costs

$5,750

ASSESSMENT INFORMATION
Direct Costs
Reserve Collections/ (Transfer)

$5,750
($5,000)

Net Total Assessment

$750

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION
Projected Reserve After FY 2020/2021
Interest Earnings
Reserve Fund Adjustments

$11,269
$35
($5,000)

Projected Reserve at End of Year

$6,304

Page 124
H:\BAD\MR West\2122\2122EngReport_MR West BAD.docx

Item # 7.

6/2/2021

PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Morgan Ranch West
FISCAL
YEAR

TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
GOAL
$750.00

2021/22

Number
of Dwelling
Units
-

Assessor Parcel No.
30.00
004-660-002
30.00
004-660-003
30.00
004-660-004
30.00
004-660-005
30.00
004-660-006
30.00
004-660-007
30.00
004-660-008
30.00
004-660-009
30.00
004-660-010
30.00
004-660-011
30.00
004-660-012
30.00
004-660-013
30.00
004-660-014
30.00
004-660-015
30.00
004-660-016
30.00
004-660-017
30.00
004-660-018
30.00
004-660-019
30.00
004-660-020
30.00
004-660-021
30.00
004-660-022
30.00
004-660-023
30.00
004-660-024
30.00
004-660-029
30.00
004-660-027
$750.00

TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
$750.00

Tax
Area
Code

Levy
-

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
25

MAX
ASSESSMENT
Last Year + 1.6% CPI
$1,219.20

H:\BAD\MR West\2122\Part C Assessment Roll

1st
Installment

-

2nd
Installment
-

01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056

15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
$375.00

15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
$375.00

Page 1

Page 125

City of Grass Valley
2021/2022 Engineer’s Report
Morgan Ranch West Benefit Assessment District No. 2010-1

Item # 7.

PART D
METHOD OF APPORTIONING
In order to maintain sufficient funding for the Districts, assessments will be adjusted annually by the
Consumer Price Indexes (CPI) Pacific Cities and U.S. City Average for February of the year of
calculation All Items Indexes for the West. The corresponding CPI for February 2021 was 1.6%.
Morgan Ranch West
The initial assessment spread created a yearly assessment per dwelling unit of $84.29. It is the intent
that each dwelling unit of the entire project share equally in all expenses upon completion.
The 2020/2021 assessment was $1,200.00. Applying the inflation adjustment, the maximum allowable
assessment for 2021/2022 is $1,219.20. The actual total assessment will be decreased to $750.00. Based
on the total build-out number of parcels and the total assessment needed, the FY 2021/2022 levy will be
$30.00 per dwelling unit.
The assessment formula is:
Assessment Per Parcel = Round (Total Assessment / # of Parcels)

Page 126
H:\BAD\MR West\2122\2122EngReport_MR West BAD.docx

City of Grass Valley
2021/2022 Engineer’s Report
Morgan Ranch West Benefit Assessment District No. 2010-1

Item # 7.

PART E
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The following pages are excerpts from the latest Assessor’s Parcel Maps of the County of Nevada
illustrating the approximate location, size and area of the benefiting parcels within the Landscaping and
Lighting District.

Page 127
H:\BAD\MR West\2122\2122EngReport_MR West BAD.docx

Item # 7.

Page 128

Item # 7.

ENGINEER’S REPORT
RIDGE MEADOWS BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2016-1

ANNUAL ASSESMENT 2021/2022

for

CITY OF GRASS VALLEY
NEVADA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Respectfully submitted, as directed by the City Council.

By:

_____________________
Timothy M. Kiser, P.E.
R.C.E. No. 58534

Page 129

City of Grass Valley
2021/2022 Engineer’s Report
Ridge Meadows Benefit Assessment District No. 2016-1

Item # 7.

ENGINEER’S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
BENFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2016-1
(Ridge Meadows)

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and
Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the _______ day of ______________,
2021.
___________________________________
City Clerk, City of Grass Valley
Nevada County, California

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and
Assessment Diagram thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City
of Grass Valley, California, on the _______ day of _________________, 2021.

___________________________________
City Clerk, City of Grass Valley
Nevada County, California

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and
Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Nevada
on the _______ day of ___________________, 2021.

___________________________________
City Clerk, City of Grass Valley
Nevada County, California

Page 130
H:\BAD\Ridge Meadows\2122\EngReport_RM BAD.docx

City of Grass Valley
2021/2022 Engineer’s Report
Ridge Meadows Benefit Assessment District No. 2016-1

Item # 7.

OVERVIEW
Timothy M. Kiser, Engineer of Work for Ridge Meadows Benefit Assessment District No. 2016-1, City
of Grass Valley, Nevada County, California makes this report, as directed by City Council, pursuant to
Section 54715 of the Government Code (Benefit Assessment District of 1982).
The improvements which are the subject matter of this report are briefly described as follows:
Ridge Meadows
The maintenance, operation and servicing of drainage improvements, as delineated on plans
prepared by Nevada City Engineering, on file with the City of Grass Valley, and modified by
subsequent development, or changes instituted by the City of Grass Valley in the routine
administration of the district, including the maintenance, operations, and servicing of the
drainage improvements.
This report consists of five (5) parts, as follows:
PART A Plans and specifications for the improvements that are filed with
the City Clerk. Although separately bound, the plans and specifications are a part
of this report and are included in it by reference only.
PART B 2021/2022.

An estimate of the cost of the improvements for Fiscal Year

PART C An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvement and levy
on each benefiting parcel of land within the district.
PART D The Method of Apportionment by which the undersigned has
determined the amount proposed to be levied on each parcel.
PART E A diagram showing all parcels of real property within this district.
The diagram is keyed to Part C by Assessor’s Parcel Number.

Page 131
H:\BAD\Ridge Meadows\2122\EngReport_RM BAD.docx

City of Grass Valley
2021/2022 Engineer’s Report
Ridge Meadows Benefit Assessment District No. 2016-1

Item # 7.

PART A
PLANS
Plans for the drainage facilities have been prepared by a variety of landscape architects and engineers.
These Plans have been filed separately with the City Engineer’s office and are incorporated in this Report
by reference only as the initial improvements were completed by separate contracts.
The following reference drawings are on file with the office of the City Engineer:
Ridge Meadows Improvement Plans (Dwg No. 1453)

Page 132
H:\BAD\Ridge Meadows\2122\EngReport_RM BAD.docx

City of Grass Valley
2021/2022 Engineer’s Report
Ridge Meadows Benefit Assessment District No. 2016-1

Item # 7.

PART B
COST ESTIMATE
The estimated cost for the maintenance of improvements described in this Report for the fiscal year 2021/2022
includes the use of reserve funds to provide maintenance to the drainage facilities and is as follows:

Ridge Meadows BAD
COST INFORMATION
Direct Maintenance Costs
County Administrative Fee
City Administration Costs

$7,080
$215
$255

Total Direct and Admin Costs

$7,550

ASSESSMENT INFORMATION
Direct Costs
Reserve Collections/ (Transfer)

$7,550
($5,700)

Net Total Assessment

$1,850

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION
Projected Reserve After FY 2020/2021
Interest Earnings
Reserve Fund Adjustments

$14,152
$35
($5,700)

Projected Reserve at End of Year

$8,487

Page 133
H:\BAD\Ridge Meadows\2122\EngReport_RM BAD.docx

6/2/2021
Item # 7.

PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Zone 5 - Ridge Meadows
FISCAL
YEAR

TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
GOAL
$1,850.00

2021/2022

Number
of Dwelling
Units
-

Assessor Parcel No.
50.00
008-980-001
50.00
008-980-002
50.00
008-980-003
50.00
008-980-004
50.00
008-980-005
50.00
008-980-006
50.00
008-980-007
50.00
008-980-008
50.00
008-980-009
50.00
008-980-010
50.00
008-980-011
50.00
008-980-012
50.00
008-980-013
50.00
008-980-014
50.00
008-980-015
50.00
008-980-016
50.00
008-980-017
50.00
008-980-018
50.00
008-980-019
50.00
008-980-020
50.00
008-980-021
50.00
008-980-022
50.00
008-980-023
50.00
008-980-024
50.00
008-980-025
50.00
008-980-026
50.00
008-980-027
50.00
008-980-028
50.00
008-980-029
50.00
008-980-030
50.00
008-980-031
50.00
008-980-032
50.00
008-980-033
50.00
008-980-034
50.00
008-980-035
50.00
008-980-036
50.00
008-980-037
$1,850.00

TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
$1,850.00

Tax
Area
Code

Levy
-

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
37

MAX
ASSESSMENT
Last Year + 1.6% CPI
$4,061.44

1st
Installment

-

H:\BAD\Ridge Meadows\2122\Part C Assesment Spread_RM

2nd
Installment
-

01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056
01056

25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
$925.00

25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
$925.00
Page 134

Zone 5 - Page 1

City of Grass Valley
2021/2022 Engineer’s Report
Ridge Meadows Benefit Assessment District No. 2016-1

Item # 7.

PART D
METHOD OF APPORTIONING
In order to maintain sufficient funding for the Districts, assessments will be adjusted annually by the
Consumer Price Indexes (CPI) Pacific Cities and U.S. City Average for February of the year of
calculation All Items Indexes for the West. The corresponding CPI for February 2021 was 1.6%.
Ridge Meadows
General Benefit
The drainage facilities in Ridge Meadows and the maintenance, operation, and servicing of those
facilities are of entirely local and special benefit to the parcels in Ridge Meadows, and no general benefits
are provided by them.
Apportionment of Special Benefits
The initial assessment spread created a yearly assessment per dwelling unit of $104.80. It is the intent
that each dwelling unit of the project shares equally in all expenses.
The 2020/2021 assessment was $3,997.48. Applying the inflation adjustment, the maximum allowable
assessment for 2021/2022 is $4,061.44 The actual total assessment will be decreased to $1,850.00. Based
on the total build-out number of parcels and the total assessment needed, the FY 2021/2022 levy will
decrease to $50.00 per dwelling unit.
The assessment formula is:
Assessment Per Parcel = Round (Total Assessment / # of Parcels)

Page 135
H:\BAD\Ridge Meadows\2122\EngReport_RM BAD.docx

City of Grass Valley
2021/2022 Engineer’s Report
Ridge Meadows Benefit Assessment District No. 2016-1

Item # 7.

PART E
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The following pages are excerpts from the latest Assessor’s Parcel Maps of the County of Nevada
illustrating the approximate location, size and area of the benefiting parcels within the Landscaping and
Lighting District.

Page 136
H:\BAD\Ridge Meadows\2122\EngReport_RM BAD.docx

Item # 7.

Page 137

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
City Council
Agenda Action Sheet

Council Meeting Date:

June 8, 2021

Date Prepared: June 3, 2021

Prepared by:

Andy Heath, Finance Director

Title:

Public Hearing to review and consider adopting the Proposed
Budget for the City of Grass Valley and the Successor Agency for
Fiscal Year 2021-22.

Agenda:

Public Hearing

Recommended Motions:

After considering public testimony, adopt Resolution No. 2021-20
approving the Proposed Budget for the City of Grass Valley and
the Successor Agency for fiscal year 2021-22. A 4/5s vote of the
Council is required for adoption of the budget.

DISCUSSION
The Fiscal Year 2021-22 Proposed Budget is presented to Council for consideration,
modification where appropriate, and adoption. This public hearing follows staff’s overview and
the City Council’s approval of the preliminary budget on May 25, 2021; which has been
available for review in its entirety on the City’s website as part of the City Council Agenda.
Staff will provide a brief presentation of the FY 2021-22 Proposed Budget, noting any changes
from the Preliminary Budget previously presented, prior to the opening of the Public Hearing.
The FY 2021-22 Proposed Budget document, which includes the budget recommended for the
City of Grass Valley Successor Agency is attached with this memorandum and includes pertinent
information and discussion as appropriate.
A copy of the draft FY 2021-22 Proposed Budget is attached with this report.
COUNCIL GOALS / OBJECTIVES
The Fiscal Year 2021-22 Proposed Budget executes portions of the work tasks towards achieving
/ maintaining the Strategic Plan goal to maintain a High-Performance Government and Quality
Service.

C:\windows\TEMP\tmp98DC.tmp

Page 138

Agenda Item # _______

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
City Council
Agenda Action Sheet

FISCAL IMPACT
The Fiscal Year 2021-22 recommended Proposed Budget balances anticipated expenditures with
anticipated revenues and carryover monies for noted funds.

REVIEWED BY:

____ City Manager

C:\windows\TEMP\tmp98DC.tmp

Page 139

Agenda Item # _______

Item # 8.

RESOLUTION NO. 2021-20
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE GENERAL BUDGET OF THE
CITY OF GRASS VALLEY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-22
WHEREAS, the City Manager submitted to the City Council prior to the 1st of June, in
accordance with Section 3, Article X of the City Charter, a proposed General Budget for the City of
Grass Valley for the Fiscal Year 2021-22; and
WHEREAS, copies of the proposed General Budget have been available for inspection by
the public in the Office of the City Clerk in accordance with the City Charter; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the proposed General Budget on June 8, 2021 at
the Grass Valley City Council Chambers at which time interested persons desiring to be heard were
given such opportunity in accordance with the City Charter; and
WHEREAS, after the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council further considered
the proposed General Budget and directed revisions it deemed advisable; and
WHEREAS, the City Charter provides that a General Budget of the City be adopted by the
affirmative votes of at least four (4) members of the Council on or before the 30th of June, for the
ensuing fiscal year.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GRASS VALLEY, as follows:
1.

That the foregoing statements are true and correct.

2.

The document entitled "Operating Budget For Fiscal Year 2021-22", which document
is incorporated herein by title reference only, is hereby adopted with the following
revisions, modifications and policy limitations as the General Budget Fiscal Year
2021-22 of the City of Grass Valley, effective July 1, 2021.
a) All revisions and changes which are necessary and in accordance with the City
Council's direction during consideration and review but prior to adoption of said
budget.
b) Any adjustment of estimated year-end reserves to actual.
c) Incorporation of any encumbered funds.
c) Any corrections of mathematical or typographical errors.
d) Any adjustments authorized pursuant to City Council action or resolution that
change or set salaries, benefits, or terms and conditions of employment for any
position, employee or unit of employees.
e) Any adjustments to revenue estimates as a result of adopted changes to the
City’s fee schedule.

Page 140

Item # 8.

3.

That Grant and Trust Fund budgets are continuously appropriated for the purpose
approved during the term of the grant agreement and pursuant to the budget
established in each grant application and contract as approved by the City Council.

4.

That Capital Project Funds for governmental and enterprise appropriations can be
distributed between individual project accounts within the Capital Project Funds as
recommended by the City Engineer and Director of Finance and approved by the
City Manager.

5.

The City Manager and Director of Finance are authorized to administer said adopted
budget in accordance with the provisions of the City Charter, City Council actions,
and administrative policies and regulations. The City Manager’s signature authority is
limited to $50,000 for budget adjustments, contracts or other actions necessary for
the administration of the budget unless otherwise authorized.

6.

Appropriations to the several departments as authorized by the General Budget are
subject to receipt of adequate revenues or appropriated reserves, and such
appropriations may be limited to available revenues.

7.

The staffing allocations as provided for in the budget are authorized, with current and
future vacant positions to be filled accordingly, including the under filling of any
position.

8.

The Grass Valley Redevelopment Successor Agency budget is included in and
adopted as part of the Citywide budget.

ADOPTED as a Resolution of the Council of the City of Grass Valley at a meeting thereof
held on the 8th day of June, 2021, by the following vote:
AYES: Council Member
NOES: Council Member
ABSENT: Council Member
ABSTAINING: Council Member

___________________________
Ben Aguilar, Mayor
ATTEST:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________
Taylor Day, Deputy City Clerk

____________________________
Michael G. Colantuono, City Attorney

Page 141

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley

. {d.h,.

Fiscal Year 2021-22

Operating Budget
Page 142

Item # 8.

CITY OF GRASS VALLEY

Ben Aguilar - Mayor

Jan Arbuckle - Vice-Mayor

HiIary Hodge - Council Member
Tom lvy - Council Member
Bob Branstrom - Council Member

Tim Kiser - City Manager
Andy Heath - Finance / Administrative Services Director
Alex Gammelgard - Police Chief

Mark Buttron - F'ire Chief
Tom Last - Community Development l)irector

Bjorn Jones - Assistant City Engineer

Page 143

Item # 8.

COMMUNITY PROFILE
The City of Grass Valley dates from the California Gold Rush and was incorporated in 1860
Grass Valley is the largest city in the western region of Nevada County and is situated in the
western foothills of the Sierra Nevada mountain range at roughly 2,500 feet elevation. It
comprises of 4.7 square miles with a population of 12,758.
Grass Valley is the location of the Empire Mine and North Star Mine, two of the richest mines in
California. Many of those who came to settle in Grass Valley were tin miners from Cornwall,
England. They were attracted to the California gold fields because the same skills needed for
deep tin mining were needed for hard rock (deep) gold mining. Many of them specialized in
pumping the water out of very deep mining shafts. The mines produced well during the
Depression of the 1930's, but closed temporarily during World War II. Not long after the war,
production costs went off the scale, and almost one hundred years after it started, it was over.
One by one the great mines closed down leaving behind colorful history, miles of subterranean
tunnels and shafts - and gold.

Mill Street and its intersection with Main Street, the heart of Grass Valley, still retain much of
the historic flavor of the Gold Rush. The spirit that established commercially successful quartz
mining helps Grass Valley remain the commercial center of Western Nevada County. The Grass
ValleyA.{evada County Chamber of Commerce has worked to attract more visitors to appreciate
the City's colorful history and structures. An active Downtown Business Association helps
maintain a vital business climate. The City of Grass Valley remains committed to providing an
attractive and quality environment in which to live and work.
Grass Valley still holds on to its Comish heritage, with events such as its annual Comish
Christrnas and St Piran's Day celebrations. Pasties are a local favorite dish with a few restaurants
in town specializing in recipes handed down from the original immigrant generation. Grass
Valley is also twinned with the Cornish town of Bodmin, United Kingdom.

Page 144

Item # 8.

r1.

i (; tr.,,\ \ \ \/ r\ t I I,\'
i i I I I . I ll '! : \

The Citizens of the City of Grass Valley

Mayor & Clty Council

City Attorney

5.0 FTE

CONTRACT

City Manager
1.0 FTE

Administrative

Community

Serulces *

Development

4.0 FTE

5.0 FTE

t*

City Clerk

Pollce **

Flre

1.0 FTE

34.0 FTE

26.0 FTE

Police

-

Anlma!
Control
2.0 FTE

Total Full Time Equivalent Positions Funded - ?( 2O2l-222

108.0 FTE

Frozen I De-Funded Positions (not included in above chart):

1.0 FTE

' Contracted Positions / Functions - Administrative Services:
tr Contracted Functions - Pollce / Flre:

- lnformation Technology Operations

Public Works

15.0 FfE

Water / Sewer
Operations
14.0 FTE

Senlor Englneer

- Dispatching Serulces
- lncludes Nevada Clty Contracted Services Provided by City of Grass Valley

Page 145

Item # 8.

CITY OF GRASS VALLEY
FISCAL YEAR 2O2I-22 BUDGET OVERVIEW
Following is a summary of the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Operating Budget, including a comparison
with prior year estimated actuals and a discussion of any recommended changes. On May 25,
2021, the City Council adopted a Preliminary Budget for FY 2021-22 consistent with City
Charter requirements. The final budget presented herein incorporates any changes to fund
schedules previously presented and also includes budgetary information for all citywide funds.
As discussed with the budget and budget updates presented during FY 2020-21, there continue to
be many fiscal uncertainties associated with the COVID-I9 Pandemic. Although the shutdown
of the economy and resulting negative impacts on overall revenue collection was less than
anticipated, the economy is not yet fully re-opened, and certain business sectors have not fully
recovered. The FY 2021-22 Budget assumes however, a continued rebound from COVIDrelated impacts, and conservatively projects that the overall economy will remain strong.
Continued increased collections of sales taxes, higher properly values and the Crty's ability to
attract grants all contribute to the robust budget presented for the coming fiscal year.
Combined operating budget estimated revenues (net of transfers) for the 2021-22 fiscal year are
$31.6 million, compared to an estimated $32.0 million for FY 2020-21. Total planned spending
for FY 2021-22 is $36.8 million, compared to $31.7 million anticipated for FY 2020-21.

Citvwide Revenues
Total estimated revenues for FY 2021-22 decrease by approximately $438,000 from the FY
2020-21estimated actuals. This slight decrease in overall expected revenues can be largely
attributed to variations in capital funding sources for prior year capital projects that are not
carried over into the coming fiscal year, offset by anticipated increases in sales and transient
occupancy taxes related to the recovery from COVID-I9.
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budgeted Operating Revenues
Total Revenues = $39236.062 (net of transfers = $31.566.062)
A$as3mant

Truct & Agency

Dlstrlct Fundr,

/lnrmd

$79,960

Scrvlcc Funds,

$717,6q'

C.ptrl Pror.ct3
Funds,
S8,916,s4G

Spech! Rewnuc
Fundr,
$1,224,068

Mr.3uri E
Fund,

Page 146

Item # 8.

Citvwide Expenditures
Anticipated expenditures for FY 2021-22 are $36.8 million (net of transfers), an increase of
approximately $5.1 million from the $31.7 million anticipated by the end of FY 2020-21. A
majority of the increase in overall expenditures can be attributed to the recommended $15.5
million capital progftrm - including the Memorial Park Facility and Pool Improvements,
McCourtrrey Road Pedestian Improvements, street overlay and rehabilitation, and varied
projects for the City's Water and Sewer enterprises. Additionally, it should be mentioned that all
positions currently vacant are budgeted for the entirety of the fiscal year (i.e. no salary savings
are built in) to assure adequate levels of appropriation authority as the demand for services
increases vis-d-vis the recovery from COVID-l9. Budgeted expenditures by fund type are show
below:

Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budgeted Operating Expenditures
Total Exnenditures = $44.508251 (net of transfens = $36.838J51)
Ar$crmcnt

1p33 Ql3enc!

Obtrlct Funds,

/ lmemd

st31,325

Srrvhc Fundc,
$88a,526

Sp.drl
RrvrnurFund:,

Strtt,zsg

ii..ilr.

E

Fund,

i7,757,324

Taken as a whole, the above estimates indicate the City will be spending approximately $5.4
million more that it will collect in revenue during the coming fiscal year, resulting in uses of
fund balance earmarked primarily for capital projects in certain funds.
The budget presented herein reviews cifiide operations as accounted for in their respective
funds while laying out respective financial plans for the 2021-22 fiscal year consistent with
stategies and directives set forth by the City Council.

A brief overview of the City's major funds is presented below:

Page 147

Item # 8.

General Fund
FY 2021-22 General Fund Final Budget:
Revenues

Expenditures

FY 2020-21 Mid-Year Budget

$ 13,962,519

$ 13,604,395

FY 2021-22 Final Budget

$ 14,545,388

$ 14,523,885

The FY 2021-22 General Fund Final Budget reflects revenues of $14,545,388 and expenditures
of $14,523,885. Revenues are higher than expenditures by $21,503 primarily due to anticipated
increases in revenues and recommended expenditures for one-time funding allocations as

follows:
COVID-|9 Revenue Recovery Impacts (increases in revenue):
o Sales Tax - $550,000 (this amount includes anticipated recovery for sales tax
based on forecast provided by City's sales tax consultant, less conservative
amounts held back pending outcome of a potential change in Amazon tax status)
o Transient Occupancy Tax - $25,000
o Parks Department Fees - $12,000
Capital and Outlay - $85,000 (Storm Drain Maintenance / Playground Maintenance)
Capital Set-Astde - $350,000 (AT&T Property Corporation Yard updates)
Program Set-Aside - $100,000 (Potential staff / contractual amount set aside for
expansion of Park programs)
Appropriationfor Contingencies - $250,000 (Amount set aside in budget for
contingencies that might arise throughout the course of the fiscal year).
FY 2021-22 budgeted revenue of $14,545,388 reflects an approximate $583,000 increase from
revenues anticipated to be collected in FY 2020-21, primarily due to:
Anticipated 3.0olo increase in property taxes consistent with current housing market
activity and increase in State CPI;
Increases in Sales and Transient Occupancy Taxes consistent with anticipated recovery to
normal collections levels as the economic impacts from COVID-I9 wane;
Increase in reimbursed costs related to the full-year inclusion of Nevada City Fire service
contracted to City into the FY 2021-22 budget;
Reductions for one-time planning and public safety grants anticipated to be received in
FY 2020-21 (note - any amounts not received in FY 2020-21will be included with the
Final Budget update in June 2021); and
Slight reductions in development-related revenues to bring budgeted amounts in line with
conservative expectations.

FY 2021-22 budgeted expenditures of $14,523,885 reflects an approximate increase of $919,000
from anticipated expenditures to be incurred in FY 2020-2l,primarily due to:
Funding of additional positions previous held unfunded and vacant as impacts of
COVID-19 Pandemic were gauged-2.0 FTE Police Officer; 1.0 FTE Sr. Administrative
Clerk; 1.0 FTE City Clerk;
Page 148

Item # 8.

Anticipated increases related to the inclusion of Nevada City firefighting personnel into
the Fire Department Budget (conhacted services for which Nevada City will reimburse
the City of Grass Valley):
lncrease in the City's police dispatch contract with the County of Nevada;
lncreases in amounts set aside for the reconfiguration of the former AT&T property (City
Corporation Yard); and expansion of the City's Parks Program; and
The inclusion of an Appropriation for Contingencies in the amount of $250,000.
As part of the FY 2021-22 Budget development process, it should be mentioned that the City
maintains specific key contingency reserves in the General Fund:
CaIPERS Pension Stabilization Reserve - $1,500,000
Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) Reserve - $500,000
Capital and Deferred Maintenance Reserve - $1,000,000
Economic Contingency Reserve - $2,500,000
These Assigned Reserves can be used in the future to offset unanticipated pension and/or health
benefit cost swings; to offset having to use General Fund discretionary funds for immediate
capital outlay and maintenance needs; and to mitigate the exposure of having to significantly
reduce service levels in the event of an economic downturn.

Taking into account the above, staffis recommending a preliminary General Fund Budget that is
balanced and anticipates a surplus of approximately $21,500. Total General Fund reserves are
anticipated to be approximately $8.11 million at the end of FY 2021-22. Projected reserve levels
as of June 30,2022 are expected to include:

- $ 6,003,506 Designated Reserves (See Attachment A for list)

-

2.109.500 Undesignated Resenes

- $&U3JL06 Total General Fund Reserves
Measure E Fund
FY 2021-22 Measure E Fund Final Budget:
Revenues

Expenditures

FY 2020-21 Mid-Year Budget

$ 5,635,000

$ 5,78r,428

FY 2021-22 Final Budget

$ 6,362,500

$ 7,757,324

The Measure E Fund accounts for the City's voter-approved 1-cent transaction and use tax
(general-purpose tax) that is used to support police and fire services; and streets and parks
projects.

FY 2021-22 budgeted revenue of $6,362,500 reflects an approximate $728,000 increase from FY
2020-21 estimated revenues of $5,635,000, primarily due to anticipated recovery of sales tax
collections as the economic impacts of the COVID-l9 Crisis wane.
Page 149

Item # 8.

FY 2021-22 budgeted expenditures of $7,757,324 reflects an approximate $2.0 million increase
from estimated expenditures for FY 2020-21primarily due to the one-time use of carryover fund
balance in FY 2020-21towards streets and parks projects. New projects anticipated to be funded
by Measure E include the Memorial Park Pool and Facility upgrade (multiple funding sources),
Mill Street Parking Lot and Slate Creek Drainage.

It should be mentioned that the Measure E Fund allocates funding for 2l.l FTE (position
allocations) - 10.9 FTE in the Police Department and 10.2 FTE in the Fire Department. The 3.0
FTE vacant FirefighterlParamedic positions frozen and de-funded during the COVID-I9 Crisis
are recommended to be funded for FY 2021-22. City staffis expected to meet with the Measure
E Oversight Committee to review FY 2021-22 budget elements prior to the consideration of the
Final Budget in June.

It is anticipated that the Measure E Fund will have approximately $1.4 million in Fund Balance
on June 30,2022. These funds may be appropriated for any Measure E related purpose in future
fiscal years.

Water Fund

FY 2021-22 Water Fund Final Budget:
Revenues

Expenditures

FY 2020-21 Mid-Year Budget

$2,572,500

$2,016,770

FY 2021-22 Final Budget

$ 2,295,000

$ 4,117,088

FY 2021-22 Water Fund revenues are currently projected to be slightly below prior year
budgeted amounts, primarily as a result of receiving a higher-than-anticipated amount of Water
Connection Fees and interest earnings in FY 2020-21. FY 2021-22 Water Fund expenditures are
recommended to be approximately $2.1 million higher than those budgeted in the prior year
primarily due to anticipated increases in raw water costs (water purchased from NID) and Water
Fund capital projects. Any capital projects not fully completed by the end of FY 2020-21will be
carried over into FY 2021-22. It should be mentioned that during the upcoming fiscal year, it is
anticipated that the City will complete a Water (and Sewer) rate study to assure fee structures are
in line with operational and capital needs expectations in the coming years.
Also recommended for the Water Fund is the continued funding of a Pension Reserve like the
one currently in place in the General Fund. Staff is recommending maintaining the set-aside of
$75,000 from Unobligated Fund Balance into the Pension Reserve, which can be used to offset
unanticipated swings in annually required pension obligations and/or reduce the pension
unfunded liability related to stafffunded by the Water Enterprise Fund.

It is anticipated that the Water Fund will have approximately $1.54 million in Fund Balance at
the end of FY 2020-21, $1.45 million of which is reserved for specific purposes. The $1.54
million ending Fund Balance assumes all capital projects are completed by the end of the fiscal
year.
Page 150

Item # 8.

Sewer Fund
FY 2021-22 Sewer Fund Final Budget:
Revenues

Expenditures

FY 2020-21 Mid-Year Budget

$ 6,741,769

$ 6,479,556

FY 2021-22 Final Budget

$ 5,095,000

$ 6,966,298

FY 202I-22 Sewer Fund revenues are currently projected to be approximately $1.65 million
lower than those budgeted in FY 2020-21. This decrease is primarily due to the removal of onetime grants received in FY 2020-21towards certain projects; and the lowering of connection fees
anticipated for the coming year, which are typically recognized as they materialize. FY 202I-22
Sewer Fund expenditures are recommended to be $487,000 higher than those budgeted in the
prior year primarily due to the carryover of projects related to Wastewater Treatment Plant
Upgrades and the Slate Creek Lift Station. As mentioned in the discussion for the Water Fund, a
Sewer Rate Study is scheduled to be completed in the coming fiscal year to assure appropriate
fee structures are in place.
Similar to the Water Fund, continued funding of a Pension Reserve is recommended for the
Sewer Fund. Staffrecommends maintaining the set-aside of $175,000 from Unobligated Fund
Balance into the Pension Reserve, which can be used to offset unanticipated swings in annually
required pension obligations and/or reduce the pension unfunded liability related to stafffunded
by the Sewer Enterprise Fund.

It is anticipated that the Sewer Fund will have approximately $4.30 million in Fund Balance at
the end of FY 2021-22,$4.27 million of which is reserved for specific purposes. The $4.30
million ending Fund Balance assumes all capital projects are completed by the end of the fiscal
year.

Gas Tax Fund
FY 2021-22 Gas Tax Fund Final Budget:
Revenues

Expenditures

FY 2020-21 Mid-Year Budget

$ 583,625

$ 838,000

FY 2021-22 Final Budget

$ 822,153

$ 818,000

The Gas Tax Fund accounts for the receipt of gas tax, SB-l (RMRA) and NCTC pass-through
revenues which may be used towards applicable transportation-related expenditures. Gas Tax
revenues anticipated to be collected during FY 2021-22 are expected to approximately $239,000
higher than those anticipated to be received in FY 2020-2I, due to anticipated collections of
Local Transportation Funding and Measure E Transfers In not received in the prior year. Gas
Tax Fund appropriations are anticipated to be $20,000 lower in the upcoming fiscal year; and are
recommended primarily for street maintenance, sidewalk and utility costs.
Page 151

Item # 8.

It is anticipated the Gas Tax Fund will have $74,000 in fund balance remaining at the end of the
2021-22 fiscal year.

Traflic Safetv Fund
FY 2021-22Trafftc Safety Fund Final Budget
Revenues

Exnenditures

FY 2020-21 Mid-Year Budget

$ 220,100

$ 185,000

FY 2021-22 Final Budget

$ 160,100

$ 156,000

The Traffic Safety Fund accounts for the receipt of parking citation revenues and a transfer in
from the Gas Tax Fund used to pay for streetlight utilities costs. Traffic Safety Fund revenues
collected during FY 2021-22 are expected to approximately $60,000 lower than those anticipated
to be received in FY 2020-21, due to a decrease in Gas Tax funds required to fund ongoing
streetlight costs. Traffic Safety Fund appropriations are anticipated to be relatively the same as
the prior fiscal year. It is anticipated the Traffic Safety Fund will have $6,600 in fund balance
remaining at the end of the 2021-22 fiscal year.

Develooment Impact Fee Fund
FY 2021-22 Development Impact Fee Fund Final Budget:
Revenues

Expenditures

FY 2020-21 Mid-Year Budget

$ 802,171

$ 40,000

FY 2021-22 Final Budget

$ 1,120,000

$

The Development Impact Fee Fund accounts for the receipt AB-1600 Development Impact Fees
to be used towards nexus-based future projects that mitigate the impacts new development.
Development Impact Fee Fund revenues anticipated during FY 2021-22 only include interest
eamings of $40,000. Due to the unpredictability of collections of these fees, the budget will be
periodically updated as the fiscal year progresses. At this time, there are no new projects
budgeted in this fund - however, to the extent any projects anticipated during FY 2020-21 are
not completed, the appropriations will be carried over into FY 2021-22 with the preparation of
the Final Budget in June 2021.
The Development Impact Fee Fund is expected to have $2.7 million in funds available for
specific projects at the end of FY 2021-22.

Page 152

Item # 8.

Caoital Proiects Fund
FY 2021-22 Capital Projects Fund Final Budget:
Revenues

Expenditures

FY 2020-21 Mid-Year Budget

$ 6,909,622

$ 5,531,670

FY 2021-22 Final Budget

$ 8,916,046

$ 8,916,046

The Capital Projects Fund accounts for the majority of non-enterprise Capital Projects not
citywide (some projects are wholly funded in the General Fund and the Measure E Fund; and are
not part of the Capital Projects Fund). Capital projects are typically funded with nondiscretionary (grants, fees, etc.) revenue sources and transfers in from other funds. Capital
Projects Fund revenue and expenditures are recommended at approximately $8.92 million for FY
2021-22. Projects were updated consistent with current cost and funding estimates, with three
new projects being added - CDBG Memorial Park Pool and Facility Improvements; Slate Creek
Drainage; and HSIP (Pedestrian Safety Enhancements) Improvements.

Special Proiects Fund
FY 2021-22 Special Projects Fund Final Budget:
Revenues

Expenditures

FY 2020-21 Mid-Year Budget

$ 10,000

$ 1,612,039

FY 2021-22 Final Budget

$ s00

$

The Special Projects Fund accounts for capital projects funded by other specific revenue sources
For the coming fiscal year, revenues only include anticipated interest earnings in the fund. At
this time, there are no recommended projects for FY 2021-22. It should be mentioned that the
$1.61 million in FY 2020-21expenditures includes funding placed towards unreimbursed storm
damage / sinkhole costs and funding towards the Mill Street Parking Lot. To the extent
anticipated expenditures towards the Mill Street Parking Lot do not materialize in FY 2020-21,
this appropriation will be carried over into FY 2021-22 and be noted in the Final Budget to be
presented in June 2021. It is anticipated that the Special Projects Fund will have $49,000
remaining for future projects on June 30,2022.

Page 153

Item # 8.

General Fund Multi-Year f,'orecast

As a means to gauge the future ability to provide a consistent level of citywide services and
programs, a Multi-Year Forecast has been developed for the City's General Fund - the fund where
the vast majority of non-enterprise services are accounted for.
The Multi-year forecast is meant to serve as only one tool to measure fiscal sustainability into the
future. The model below incorporates known cost drivers, including any negotiated salary
increases, CaIPERS retirement cost increases, annual appropriations for capital projects and
recurring capital maintenance, and a conservative increase in all other operating expenditures. The
model also assumes conservative growth in discretionary revenue soruces, including property tax,
sales tax, transient occupancy tax and franchise fees. The model is developed to demonstrate the
ability to sustain the existing levels of service provided citywide.

h

U
tt
trl

o
UI

=
c

c5
UI

tr{,o

3u,q0

,Lq,@

st!;n@
tu.q.@
3rrs0,@

s489,233

t0,@
to
6s@pq

3![moD

S827,383
s955,441
(ss38,s94)
321,s03

-2 l$,qm)
lsLs,oo,

E

2

t

6

38.onm

ot
Irl

$r,.s$

2
Ll

$r,rn'@

$Lqto
$orn,@

rrlorlrr tilIlr{o Fr&iu rla{2 arp{r ?t?@Et Ft&ti}t F m{t Ft&,flt
Lta ffi
Sl\r
Icetcil.l tund Xonnuec r6.mrd Rmd Erprtdtrrs *SuDhE /(Dddtl

cl

srl,rn,@

3TL!n,G

s

I,t
lr.

II
E

=
2
2

3ro.G0

As indicated in the model above, a surplus of $21,503 is anticipated for FY 2021-22. This surplus
takes into account increased collections of revenues in the wake of the COVID-I9 crisis and
positive fiscal impacts associated with the issuance of a pension obligation bond; offset by
conservative increases in general expendifures and staffing costs and one-time set-asides for a
corporation yard update and parks program management. The forecast also includes a $250,000
contingency appropriation for the current and future years.
Baseline revenues are anticipated to be higher than baseline expenditures forecasted for each year
beginning in FY 2022-23 as effects of the COVID-l9 Crisis are expected to wane and as the
financial impacts of issuing a Pension Obligation Bond to fund a majority of the CaIPERS
Unfunded Liability continue to be realized. As shown in the graph below, total expenditures for
CaIPERS-related costs are anticipated to be approximately $1.9 million annually through FY 202627 (note: salary increases are not built in) versus nearly $2.5 million annually had the bonds not
been issued.

Page 154

Item # 8.

srrouc

$r,spt,

Although the forecast indicates the likelihood of a surplus with each year beginning in FY 202223, it should be mentioned that economic forces and anticipated volatility in personnel-related cost
drivers could significantly impact forecasts for future years. Additionally, this forecast does not
include the 20.2 public safety positions; and extensive steet reatrabilitation and parks projects
funded by the Measure E Transactions Tan. To the extent Measure E funds were not available,
approximatley $2.7 million in ongoing annual costs related to Measure E staffrng only would likely
be requried to be borne by the General Fund.

Page 155

Item # 8.

CITY OF GRASS VALLEY
FISCAL YEAR 2O2I-22 FINAL BUDGET
SCHEDULE OF FTJNDS PRESENTED

Fund

Description

General Fund

Primary operating fund of the City; accounts for all activities
except those legally or administratively required to be accounted
for in other funds

Measure E Fund

Memo fund to the General Fund established to account for
proceeds of a one-cent transactions & use (sales) tax measure
approved by the city electorate in 2018. Funds are used primarily
for public safety, parks and streets-related services and programs.

Enterprise Funds:
Water Fund

Accounts for the operation, maintenance and capital activity of the

City's water treatment and distribution system.
Sewer Fund

Accounts for the operation, maintenance and capital activity of the

City's wastewater treatments plant and collections facilities.
Special Revenue Funds:
Gas Tax Fund

Accounts for funds received and expended for street maintenance
purposes as defined in Sections 2105,2106,2107 and2l07.5; and
the Road Maintenance & Rehabilitation Act (RMRA) of the
Streets and Highways Code.

Traffic Safety Fund

Accounts for revenue received for the City's programs associated

with the maintenance of equipment and supplies for traffic law
enforcement and traffrc accident prevention.
Fire Reserve Fund

Accounts for funds received related to fire equipment maintenance
and replacement - receipts into fund typically come from
participation in Fire Strike Teams.

Page 156

Item # 8.

CITY OF GRASS VALLEY
FV 2O2I-22 FINAL FINAL BUDGET
SCHEDULE OF FUNDS PRESENTED

Fund

Descriotion

Special Revenue Funds, cont.:

DUI Grant Fund

Accounts for revenues received for the State DUI grant related to
prevention proglams.

EPA Site Grant Fund

Accounts for funds received and expended on an approved EPA
project.

Developer Impact Fee Fund Accounts for funds received as a result of development impact on

City infrastructure and systems.
Vehicle Replacement Fund Accounts for activities of the City's vehicle replacement program,
the costs of which are distributed among designated user
departments.

E. Daniels Park Fund

Accounts for funds received for the Elizabeth Daniels Park.

Animal Shelter Fund

Accounts for funds received for the Animal Shelter

Capital Projects Funds:
Capital Projects Fund

Accounts for funds collected and expended for the construction or
purchase of public facilities and projects.

Special Projects Fund

Accounts for funds collected and expended for the construction of
special projects.

Maintenance Assessment District Funds:

All Maintenance Assessment District funds account for revenues and expenditures associated
with the repairs and maintenance of landscaping, lighting and infrastructure within the District
boundaries.

Page 157

Item # 8.

CITY OF GRASS VALLEY
FY 202I.22 AMENDED FINAL BUDGET
SCHEDULE OF FUNDS PRESENTED

Maintenance Assessment District F unds, co nt. :
Whispering Pines Improvement District - Lighting & Landscape Fund
Litton Business Park Improvement District - Lighting & Landscape Fund
Morgan Ranch Improvement District - Lighting & Landscape Fund
Ventana Sierra Improvement District Fund
Scotia Pines Improvement District Fund
Morgan Ranch 2003-l Maintenance Assessment District Fund
Morgan Ranch West Benefit Assessment District Fund
Morgan Ranch West Improvement Diskict - Lighting & Landscape Fund
Ridge Meadows Improvement District - Lighting & Landscape Fund
Ridge Meadows Benefit Assessment District Fund
Trust & Agency / Internal Service Funds:
Downtown Assmt Dist.

Accounts for funds received to be utilized in the beautification and
maintenance of the Downtown Assessment area.

GV Successor Agency Fund Accounts for the former Grass Valley Redevelopment Agency
dissolution activities pursuant to ABXI 26 effective October 2011.
HOME / Housing Funds:

All HOME / Housing funds account for revenue, expenditures and loans receivable associated
with HOME grant progmms.
02-HOME-0586 Fund
09-HOME-6272Fund
l2-HOME-8564 Fund
HOME Grant Fund
99-HOME-0369 Fund
00-HOME-0461 Fund
00-HOME-14968 Fund (Active Grant)

Page 158

Item # 8.

CITY OF GRASS VALLEY
FY 202I.22 AMENDED FINAL BUDGET
SCHEDULE OF FUNDS PRESENTEI)

Fund

Descrintion

CDBG Bloch Grant Funds:

All CDBG Block Grant funds account for revenues, expenditures and loans receivable associated
with block grant programs.
04-STBG-1960 Fund
CDBG Fund
CDBG Revolving Fund
CDBG Revolving Loan Fund
CDBG Housing Fund
86-STBG-217 Fund
9I-STBG467 Fund
95-STBG-897 Fund
97-STBG-Ilt8 Fund
99-STBG-1362 Fund
CDBG Doris Drive Fund
Housing Rehabilitation Fund
CDBG Parks Crrant Fund (Active Grant)

Page 159

Item # 8.
Otyof GnssValhy
Budget€d Funds Synopsls
Annual Operatlons and Fund Balance
Flscal Year 2021-22 Flnal Budget Update

-il 2027.22 Amendcd Flnol Budget UpddeEstlmated
Flscal Year202l-22
Fund Balance
Revenues Erpendltures 6li!il.l2g2jl

2020-2'
Total
Fund Balance

Reuenues Exoendftures

6l*l2o2t

6llnl2o2o

Fund - Desc.lptlon
100 - General Fund

-Fy
Flscal Year 202G21 Btlmated

Estlmated
Fund Balance

s

200-MeasureEFund

s 14,s4s,388 s L4,523,88s

7,733,?79

S 13,962,s19

13,604,395

S 8,091,s03

2,9LO,O99

5,63s,000

5,78L,428

2,76?,677

6,362,s00

7,757,324

2,W2,627

S 2,s72,sm

2,OL6,770

s 3,3s8,3s7

S 2,29s,ooo

4,117,088

5,911,790

6,74L,769

6,479,ss6

6,114,N3

s,09s,000

6,966,298

583,62s

838,m0

220,L@
90,125

18s,000

69,3s7
2,530

21,331

s

8,113,006
1,36&847

Ente|p,dse Funds

sff! - Water Enterprise Fund

s

510 - Sewer Enterprise Fund

$

1,536,269
4,302,705

Speclal Ranenuc Funds
201 - Gas Tax Fund

822,1s3 s

202 - Traffic Safety Fund

323,73?
(32,570)

203 - Fire Reserve Fund

42,235

204 - DUI Grant Fund

205- EPA Site Grant Fund
206 - Developer lmpact Fee Fund

4,515
(13,1s3)

109,399

96,246

2,959,283

w2,L7t

1,120,000

2,il7,454

225 - Vehicle Replacement Fund

70,223

33,094

37,t29

450 - E. Daniels Park Fund

101,411

2,0(x)

103,411

1,000

104,411

451 - Animal Shelter Fund

7,OL4

250

7,zil

L25

7,389

s

s

s

25

160,100

818,000
1s6,000

151,029

1,m0

5,000

4,540

25

s

199,655

s

73,5L0
6,630
747,O29

4,565
199,65s

40,000

2,68L,454
33,094

403s

Capkol PtoJects Funds
300 - Capital Projects Fund

s

310 - Special Projects Fund

1t,377,9521

S 6,909,522 S

L,650,572

5,531,670

10,000

1,612,039

s 8,s16,045 s 8,916,045 s

s

s00

48,533

49,033

Assessn ent Drstrld Funds
210 - Whipering Pines lmprovement Dist. L&L

35,725

25,497

18,397

211 - Litton Business Pa* lmprovement Dist. L&L

L7,420

5,928

L7,628

212 - Morgan Ranch lmprovement Dist, L&L

15,785

24,445

213 - Ventana Sierra lmprovement Dist,

7,9t8

s

s

42,225

s

2s,462 5

M,397
6,7t7

s

23,290
4,760

19,815

5,720
20,4L5

5,757
24,833

22,303

22,945

4,6m

6,518

3,140

4,4N

2,230

(8,4m)

8,9L7

5,258
(13,/t00)

3,000

16,934

3,977
1,s00

10,500

7,934

8,613

1,350

8,422
77,632

510

9,2@
4,000

4,932

9,394

t3,294

L4,6t2

4,O97

7,597

214 - Scotia Pines lmprovement Dist.

(10,025)

215 - Morgan Ranch 2003-1 lmprovement Dist. MA

L8,634

3,200
3,855
1,300

216 - Morgan Ranch West BAD

10,293

1,350

217 - Morgan Ranch West lmprovement Dist. L&L

8,122

600

218 - Ridge Meadows lmprovement Dist. L&L

t7,032

9,394

3,030
500
8,794

219 - Ridge Meadows BAO

11,032

4,O97

5L7

7rust & Agency

s

763
L3,732
L7,LL?

/ tntcmdl Sefllcc Funds

770 - Downtown Assessment District Fund
780 - Grass Valley Successor Agency Fund

$

24,722
753,L77

s

55,1m

56,821

682,6LO

il7,672

s

23,001

788,115

s

55,100

60,000

662,500

824,526

s

18,101

626,089

Page 160

Item # 8.
Oty of Grass Valley
Budgcted Funds SVnoFls
Annual Operatlons and Fund Balance
Flscal Year 2021-22 Flnal Budget Updat€

Total

FY 202G2

I Estl mote d

-

loans Receiyable

Flscal Year 202G21 Estlmated

Estlmated
loans Receivable

6lyDl2o2O

Revenues Erpendltures

6l3i0l2o2t

Fund - Descrlptlon
COBG & HOME Loan

--*

-ft 2021-22 Flnol Budget U$oteEstlmated
Flscal Year 2021-22
Loans Receivable
Rerrenues Expendltures 6l3/J,12022

/ Program lncome Funds

230 - 02-HOME{586 Fund

4,287,2N

s

231 - 09-HOME-6?72Fund

s

4,307,6U

s0,000
7,000

15

408,22s

12,000

420,225

10,795

7U,370

10,000

794,370

68,LL7

367,574

47,524

\77432s

s,000
47,524

372,st4
t,825,U9

12,000

233 - HOME Grant Fund

849,983

85,613

234 - 99-HOME-0359 Fund

4t2,574

235 - @HOME{451 Fund

1,730,801

236 - @-HOME-14968 Fund

270,829 S

1,096

241 - CDBG Fund

539,17t

4,747

243 - CDBG Revolving Loan Fund

181,697

71,560

244 - CDBG Housing Fund

57,060
37
49,250

52,857

245 - 85-STBG-217 Fund
246 - 91-STBG467 Fund

4L2,437

475,000

496,0@
s

270,5t8

S

S

1,096

3,247
750

27o,2u

537,498

44,747

111,500

498,307

7t7,L37-

17,000

170,750

LO7,t37

65,off)
37

247 - 95-S[BG-897 Fund

25,sOL

2,772

70,57t

70,550

249 - 99-STBG-1362 Fund

110,000

250 - CDBG Doris Drive Fund

40,5t7

3,519

251 - Housing Rehab Fund

359,901

12,500

22,507

3,900

50,000
s,000

19,501

70,000
110,000

110,000

500

37,298

3,519

10,0(n

352,i101

12,500

20,s00

3,s00,000

3,s00,000

252 - CDBG Parks Grant Fund

Total Bud&t (Ercludlng CDBG & HOME):

37

49,776

248 - 97-SrBG-1118 Fund

37,298
344,W1.

Fund Balance

Flscal Year 202G21 (Est.)

Est. Fund Balance

Flscal Year 2021-22

Est. Fund Balance

June !10,2020

Revenues Expendltures

June !1O,2021

Rcvenues Expendltures

June 30,2022

s

7,733,379

s 13,962,s19

13,6@,395

S 8,091,s03

s 14,545,388

14,523,885

2,910,099

5,635,ofi)
9,3r4,269

5,78L,428
8,496,326

2,763,67t

6,362,500

7,757,324

L,368,U7

9,532,360

11,083,386

1,807,69s

2,293,67t
7,t43,709

3,OL6,714

7,390,000
1,224,068

L,zLt,759

5,838,974
3,029,023

48,533

8,916,546

8,916,046

49,033

132,69L

79,960

131,325

81,326

811,116

7t7,6N

88/',526

w,L90

S 24,396,s8s

S 39,236,062
s (7,670,000)

44,508,251

Enterprise Funds

8,7t4At7

Special Revenue Funds

3,502,690
272,620

Capital Projects Funds
Assessment District Funds
Trust & Agency Funds

lotol:

s

6,960

242 - CDBG Revolving Fund

General Fund
Measure E Fund

s

4,000

5

4,357,6il

405,437

7,W

232 - 12-HOME-8564 Fund

2,S0 - O4-SIBG-1960 Fund

5

79,536

398,437
396,225

5

131,536

6,9L9,622
79,666

777,899

737,7LO

78,'LL
7U,491

?4,u2,64o

s

38,456,481

38,LO2F33

LESS: Transfers:

s

(6,4s2,3241

(6,4s2,3241

Total Operatlng Budget l{et of Transfens:

S 32,fi14,1s7 31,6so,209

s

s

8,113,006

19,124,399

(7,670,000)

$ 31,s66,062 36,8:18,251
Page 161

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year202l-22 Final Budget
Capital Outlay / Projects Reconciliation

Fund

Capital Outlay / Project

Project

Outlay

General Fund

- Information Services Information Technology Equipment
- Police

Police Equipment - Base Budget

- Non-Departmental

Aerial Survey
McCourtney Road ATP Project
Corporation Yard Update Set-Aside

$

50,000

$

5,000
$

10,000
10,000

350,000

Measure E Fund
- Police

- Fire

- Parks

Police Vehicle Leases
Police Equipment - Base / Laptops

$

Fire Vehicle Leases
Fire Equipment - Base / Two Vehicles

$

175,000

95,000
8,913

265,000

Measure E Parks Projects
Condon Parking Lot Improvement

$

780,000
650,000

Memorial Park CDBG Project
Water Line Replcmt - Linden / Church

s

200,000
200,000

Water Fund

Water Systems Plan

10,000

Empire Water Tank
Water Line Project

200,000
530,000

JanlHill Water Project

150,000

Water Treatment Plant Maintenance
Annual Water System Maintenance
Annual Flushing Program
Water Rate Impact Fee Study

210,000
400,000
100,000

75,000

Sewer Fund
NPDES 2008-13 Project
Annual Sewer Maintenance
Annual WWTP Projects
2018 WWTP Improvements Project
Slate Creek Lift Station Project
Sewer Rate Study

s

60,000
200,000
1,300,000

50,000
450,000
100,000

Page 162

Item # 8.

City of Grasr Valley
Fiscel Ye*2021-22 Finel Budget
Capital Outlay / Projects Reconciliation

Fund

Capitel Outlay / Project

Outlay

Project

Capital hojecls Fund
Street Maintenance Projects

$

Street Rehabilitation Proj ects

Storm Drain Maintenance
Wolf Creek Trail Project Study Report
Mill Street Parking Lot
McCourtrey Road Pedestrian Impvmt
Annual Sidewalk Repain / Mtc
Playground Maintenance Projects
Measure E Street / Overlay Projects

&0,046
25,000
50,000
1,270,000
5,000,000
300,000
200,000

CDBG Memorial Park Facility lmprvmt
HSIP Grant lmprovements
Slate Creek Drainage

Citywide Captial Outlay / Projects Totals:

100,000

550,000
35,000
271,000
475,000

$

598,913 $ 14,951,046

$ 1s5499s9
Note: The lnformation prusented herein presents the lund in whlch the coptial outlay / project is fully approprlotedSeveral prujeas whlch have muhiplefundlng sources accountedfor as fiansfers itdout are listed in rhefund ln
which they are wholly accountedfor.

Page 163

Item # 8.

City of Gress Valley
Fiscal Yeer 2021-22 Final Budget
Gcncrel Fund Revenue and Expenditure Detail

Acaud
FY 201&19

Actud
FY 20tq20

Mid-Yar Budgrt /
YoFErd EltiErtr
FY 202G2r

Find Budgca
Fv 2021-22

N,EVENUES

Tue

$

Fmchiscs

to,469,532
789,343
t94,3 l2

10,823, I 34

I 1,389,103

805,000

Elr,000

189,000

188,425

850,6t4

t,266,046

r,67t,075

178,820

70,000

302,488
29,390
63,006

694,839
36,000

60,000
407,535
3,000
8,250

13,346,588 n,A77,505 t3,962,519

14,545,388

326,t90

10,579,t77
75 1,898

Limss
SwiccsOwge/Fc

zzo,463
1,0t4,552
207,363
277,522
I t4,2E3

Intcros & Usc of Moncy
Olhcr Agcncis
Co$ Reimbrfiscrnfits / Trmsfers

OthuRflmum

181,330

78,500

Other Finmcing Sourcca

TotrlRmua

$

EXPENDITURES
City Council
City Mmagcr

s

305,374

29,202
343,075

30,877
269,753

30,558

Finecc Dc?ffinat

524,O79

568,325

463,833

Pcrsomcl

24,936

25,750

lnformrion Sysrms

340,t72

333,E00

City Anomcy

223,000

I 1,664
t78,735
230,30t

4,24t,636

4,539,23 I

4,320,20t

Polie Dcprtnat
Police D6pEtn€nt - Animd Cmtsol
Firo Dcputnat

I93,1 I 0

t96,612

lw,897

198,2 l7

2,433,922
sBt,527
404,046
350,526

2,858,81 l

Commity Dsvclopmcot - Plming
Colmuity Dcvcloptrl6t - Building

300,,141

367,913

424,t00

tublic Wots - Engincaing

339,467

hblic Worts- Frilitis

I 14,903
104,560

34$,678
121,576
227,791

525,t92
85,630
28E,256

t,930,682
437,000

DcblScrvie
Apprcpriation for Contiagancy
Transfers Out

Exccss / (Dcficit) of

Rfln6 ovef,

Expqditurcs

372,570
420,438
291,689

123,409

I 18,305

2t3,723

745,6&6

496,52t

457,097

80,135

32,891

370,175

278,799

488,506
3s,060
366,690

2,275,296

t,482,t49

1,753,596

M2,370

1,004,910

992,342
250,000
85,000

7t3

Non-Dcpafilcntal

Totd Erpdditurct

443,253
35,500
205,400
200,000
4.765.547

2,036,784

2,153,259
291,544

Public Wo*s - Rea Sflicrs
Public Worts - Stcas
Pats md Rosctim - Swimming Pool
Prls md Rcmaion - PrIs Maintailrne
Parts ud Rcmaion - Rowuim

200,000

30,385

250,000

442,8W

s
$

t2.857-355 S

488,805
t3.816_095

162,285

s

r3,6M,395 t

14,523,185

419,233

(938,590)

358,t24

21,503

r,182,736

8,67t,969

7,733,379

E,091,503

8 571 96C

77111 79

8.09r.503

t.l t3.m6

RmcTransfcrto Impact Fcc Fmd
BcgiuningFmd Balre
tuding Fud Balme
Lerr- Irdgaald Rlrrrv.s:
Cmstsuction Dcposits
Polico D@artnDnt Propcrty Dlposits
Assct Forfsiturc Fmds

3
3
s

Nretislnvc*igtim
SMA Part Funds
North StE RocL Ro8d Mitig:*ion

114,393
69,430
9,252
t2,a23

ll4,4l8
69,430
9,2s2
n,823

lt4,4l8
69,430
9,252

t2,U3

l67,8Et

lnfrasmare Rcpair od Rcplma
Trec Prcecrvuion
Whispcring Pine

PARSACClaimRcwa
ADA Aoccss - SB I lE6
Pasion Sabilizaim Rcservc
OPEB Stabilizdion Rcgcrv€
Cryitsl snd DcfaEd Maintcnmcp Rcwc
Economic Contingcnry Rme

Amomt Nor Obligded at Ycar End

ll4jl8
9,252
12,823

s

16,543
16,543
16,543
19,187
l9,lE7
19,187
10,700
10,700
10,700
t53,160
153,160 t53,t60
75,000
75,000
75,000
15,133
22,394
22,993
t,500,000 t,500,000 1,500,000
500,000 500,000 500,000
t,000,000 1,000,000 t,000,000
2,500,000 2,s00,000 2,500,000

2,500,000

2-577.86s

2.109.500

1.730-497

2.087.997

t6,543

t9,t87
10,700
153,160
75,000

22,93
t,500,000
500,000
1,000,000

Page 164

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Final Budget
General Fund Revenue Account Detail

Item # 8.

Actuals
FY 2018-19

Actuals
FY 2019-20

Mid-Year Budget /
Yerr-End Estimate

Final Budget

FY 2020-21

Fv 2021-22

Descriotion
Property Ta"xes
RPTTF Residual Property Tax Distributions
Property Tax in Lieu of MVLF

$

Sales Taxes

ERAF in Lieu of Sales Tax
Sales Tax Payment to Nevada County
Transient Occupancy Taxes
Real Estate Transfer Taxes
Property Tax Homeowners Exemption
Property Tax Payment to NCCFPD

2,729,648

2,806,980
277,421

2,935,000

194,005

1,273,631
6,497,601

t,3t1,679
6,830,132

r,380,634
6,500,000

( l, r 36,557)

( r,537,505)

(r,r00,000)

916,808
87,470

697,942
60,869
22,014

750,000
60,000

10,469,532

10,t23,134

22,692
(6,121)

TOTALTAXES $
Franchise - Gas & Electric
Franchise - Solid Waste

10,579,177

275,W0

3,045,300
280,500
1,422,053
7,050,000
(1,233,750)
775,000
50,000

22,s00

1lJE9,l03

146,780

l6l,05 r

160,000

163,000

439,604

480,000

490,000

165,514

465,273
163,019

165,000

16s,000

TOTALFRANCHISES $

751,898

789J43

805,000

818,000

$

208,086

19r,394
2,918

185,000

I 85,925

t2,377

4,000

2,500

220,463

194,312

189,000

18E,425

52,699

50,446
250,965
34,746
99,987
248,920

70,000
300,000

65,000
250,000
958,650
245,000
r4,000
71,000
34,17s
33,250
1,671,o75

$

Franchise - Cable TV

Business Licenses
Business License Penalties

TOTALLICENSES $
Planning Department Fees / Permits
Building Department Fees / Permits
Code Enforcement Penalties
Fire Deparfrnent Fees / Permits
Fire Department Assessments
Public Works / Engineering Fees / Permits
Animal Shelter Fees / Other Revenues
Police Department Fees / Other Revenues
Parks Department Fees

TOTALSERVICECHARGES/FEES

$

287,t73
r 05,356
248,147

$

18,6t 5

16,558

80,564

35, r 60

t72,149

7t,905

49,849

4t,927

453,650
245,000
I 3,500
97,221
65,425
21,250

1,014,552

850,614

1,266,046

Page 165

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Final Budget
General Fund Revenue Account Detail

Item # 8.

Actuals
FY 2O1E-I9

Actuels

Fr 2019-20

Mid-Year Budget /
Year-End Estimate
FV 2020-Zt

Final Budget
FY 2021-22

Descriotion
Interest Earnings
Unrealized Gain / (Loss) on Investments

$

207,363

178,820

70,000

60,000

TOTAL INTEREST & USE OF MONEY $

2O7,363

178,820

70,000

60,000

6,336
5,000

r0,r78

10,000

10,000

Beverage Recycling Program

5,000

5,000

5,000

Public Safety - Proposition 172

tt4,96t

113,776

140,035

Public Safety Grants
FEMA Grants

45,000

24,232

l 13,089
238,7s0

COPS Grant - A83229
SB-2 / LEAP Planning Grant

75,000

125,000

100,000

100,000

POST Reimbursements
Other State Reimbursements

22,970

17,04r

220,000
2,500
4,000

4,000

ADA Disability (SB-l186 Fee)

8,25;

7,26t

r,500

1,500

277,522

302,48E

694,839

407,535

I I1,283

26,390

75,500

3,000

3,000

3,000

TOTAL COST REIMBURSEMENTS / TRANSFERS $

114,283

29,390

78,500

3,000

TOTALOTHERREVENUES $

181,330

63,006

36,000

8,250

13346.s88

12.877-ils

13.962.519

14545388

Motor Vehicle License Fees

$

TOTALFROMOTHERAGENCIES $
Expense Reimbursements

$

r47,000

Cost Al location Reimbursements

Transfer In from Gas Ta:< Fund
Transfer In from ABt600 Fire Fac Reserve
Transfer in from Developer Impact Fees

TOTALOTHERFINANCINGSOURCES $

TOTALGENERALFUND $

Page 166

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Finat Budget
General Fund
Deoartmental Expenditure Account Ihteil
Mid-Ycer Budgct/

Actud

Actuel

Ycer-End Esdmetc

Final Budget

Fr 2018-19

F',r 2019-20

Fy 202UZl

FY 20nA2

Citv Admtntstatton

Cify Council - 101
Personal Services

18,381

18,192

r2,t77

I r,010

12,200

12,300

$

30"ss8

292O2

30877

3o3ts

$

280,644

324,9s8

237,653

306,345

24,730

l8,l l7

32,100

20,545

s

30sJ74

34307s

269J53

326,t90

$

24r,936
282,t43

361,45r

361,733

436,9s3

2M,874

102,100

46300

524,079

568J2s

463,t33

48325t

24,986

tt,664

25,750

35,500

u:9t6

11,64

25,750

35"500

257,933

207,893
(83,157)

223,000

259,000
(103,600)

$

Seruices and Supplies

$

18,677

$

lE,0E5

Cost Allocation

Capital Outlay

Totrl:
City Menegcr - 102
Personal Serviccs
Services and Supplies
Cost Allocation

Capital Orday

Totd:
Financc Ihprrtmcnt - l(X
Personal Servioes
Services and Supplies
Cost Allocation

Capital Outlay

Totel:

$

Pcrsonncl - 103
Persooal Scrvices

$

Services and Supplies
Cost Allocation

Capital Outlay

Totel:

s

Informetion Services - 105
Personal Services

$

Services and Supplies
Cost Allocation

Capital Outlay

Totel:

$

(Ee,200)

82,239

53,999

200,000

50,000

34,0,172

r7tJ35

333,too

205,4010

Page 167

Item # 8.

City of Gress Valley

Fiscal Y ar 2021-22 Final Budget
General f,'und

Denertmentel Exnenditure Account Deteil

Mid-YcerBudgct/
Actual

Aetuel

Ycr-End Estlmrtc

Final Budget

Ir201&19

F'r 2019-20

r.Y 2020-21

Fv 2021-22

City Attorncy - 106
P€rs@d Scrviccs

$

Services and Supplies

223,000

230,301

200,000

200,000

s

223,000

z'oJor

200,000

200,000

$

Cost Allocation

Capital Outlay

Total:

PubltcSaf*
Policc - 201
Personal Services

3,3t3,769

3,617,025

3,408,701

3.704.07s

Services and Supplies

832,963

910,280

881,500

t,0s6472

Capital Outlay

24,9M

11,926

30,000

5,000

s

424t,5X

453913r

4320r0r

4J6sS47

$

154,864

136,804

150,397

163,517

38,246

59,808

34,s00

34,700

$

193,1 l0

196,512

t,,,''gf,

tqt2r7

$

1,627,6@

1,5t7,994
s6s265

t.92s.222

2,275261

4@,120

508,700

583,s50

$

2,0x,7u

2,153,,59

2433,1922

2,t5t,tl1

$

238,139

2s4,A9

319,327

32t,370

62342

37,115

262,2N

44,200

300,441

291,544

5t1527

372.570

Total:
Pollcc - Animrl Control - 202
Personal Services
Services and Supplies

Capital Outlay

Total:

Firt - 203
Personal Services
Services and Supplies

Capital Or*lay

Totrl:
Comntnltv Da,eloomcnt
Plenning - 301
Personal Services
Services and Supplies

Capital Outlay

Total:

3

Page 168

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscsl Year202l-22 Final Budget
General Fund
Deoertmcutel Erncnditure Account Detril

Mid-YcerBudgct/
Actual

Acturl

Ycrr-End Estlnatc

Final Budget

Fr 201&19

FY 2019-20

rv 2020-21

Ftt 202142

Building - 302
Personal Scrnices

310,790

350,916

343,296

353,688

Seryices aad Supplies

55,1 l3

73,t84

60,750

66,750

Capital Outlay

2,010

$

Totrl:

$

367913

424,100

,104,046

420,438

$

327219
t2,248

327,768

338,s26

279,689

18,910

12,000

12,000

$

t:tg,67

346.,678

3s0J26

29r,5t9

$

68,037

74,62t

72,909

74,205

46,866

46,94E

50,500

44,100

114,903

121,576

t23A09

r1tJ05

96,035

145,307

t51,723

179,686

8,525

82,4U

62,000

66,000

s

r04"560

x27Jgt

213,723

245,686

$

3t0,417

379,81s

34t,597

376,006

144,775

t16,706

108,500

I 12,500

gls,ly2

496,521

457,4n

4tt506

hrbllc Works
Enginccring - 401
Personal S€rr/ices
Services and Srpplies

Capital Outlay

Totd:
Frcilitics -,m4
Personal Services
Services md Supplies

Capital outlay

Totrl:
Flect Scnices - 403
Pcrsonal Services

$

Services and Supplies

Capital Outlay

Tofrl:
Strccts - 402
Personal Services
Services and Supplies

Capital Outlay

Totrl:

3

Page 169

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Yqr202l42 Final Budget

General Fund
Deoertmentel Erpcnditure Account Deteil

Actuel

Actuel

Mld-Ycer Budgct /
Ycrr-End Estlmetc

Final Budget

F"y 201&19

F"r 2019-20

I"Y 202G21

Fv 2021-22

Pa*s and necreodon
Swimming Pool - 5l)2
Personal Services

31,175

30,729

13,041

13,7t0

54,455

50,106

r9,850

21,350

$

t5,630

t0,&35

32$cr

35,060

$

203,141

190,540

202,699

191,690

85,1 l5

179,635

76,100

r75,000

$

28t,256

370,175

27t,799

366,690

$

713

$

713

$

907,r51

1,136,908

410,337

389,888

916,514

1,091,399

1,00s,812

993,70t

6366

250,000

250.000

E1,304

40,623
66,000

370,00;
2,003596

$

Services and Supplics

Capital Outlay

Total:
Perks Melntcnencc - 501 / 504
Personal Services
Services and Supplics

Capital Outlay

Totd:
Recreotion -.Ifr (In Parks FY 2020-21 Amended)
Personal Services
Services and Supplies

Capital Outlay

Totel:

Non-D@oftnartal/ Other
Non-Departmcntd - 601
Personal Services
Services and Supplies
Cost Allocation

Appropriation for Contingency
Reimbursable Costs

Capital Outlay

25,713

Totrl:

$

1,930,6t2

2A7sA96

1J32,149

Page 170

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
X'iscal Yet202l-22 Final Budget

General Fund
Deoertmcntel Erpcnditurc Account Dcteil

Actuel

Actuel

Mld-Ycrr Budgct/
Ycrr-End Ertlmrtc

r"Y 201&19

r^Y 2019-20

r"r 2020-21

Finel Budget
Fv 2021-22

Dcbt Scrvlcc - 5275
Facility Improvcmeirts

$

Pension Obligation Bonds

360,880

360,633

922,898

Opteira Solar Lrase

76,120

8l 737

82,012

tE,l5l

$

437,000

442370

1,004910

992342

$

M2,899

4t8,805

t62,285

t5,000

$

442sgD

{tt t05

t62ats

t5,(n0

Totsl:

904,191

Trrnsfon Out - stg)
Capital Projects - Fund lto
Vchicle Replacement - Fund 310
Fire Reserve FuDd - Fund l2l

Dorscy Maftetrlace - 6208 (Reinbwsed)

Totd:

Page 171

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Final Budget
Measure E Fund (Fund 200)

Actua!

Actual

FY 201&19

F Y 2019-20

Mid-Year Budgct /
Year-End Estimate
FY 2020-21

Final Budget
FY 2021-22

Rcvenues:
Measure N Sales Tax
Measure E Sales Tax

$

Fire Departrnent Response Reimbursement
Interest Income
Other Income

859,557
4,083,50s
4,083
106,366

5,886,33 I

12,565
37,021

5,600,000
25,000
10,000

6,350,000
5,000
7,500

15,556
$

5,053,51 I

5.951.473

5.635.000

6.362.500

$

790,019
101,579
721,079

r,040,8r0

1,38 r,35 l

1,387,890

84,102

I 87,500

999,5t2

1,t80,229
t72,894

Exoenditures:
Police - Personal Services
Police - Non-Personal Services
Fire - Non-Personal Services
Public Works - Personal Services
Public Works - Non-Personal Services
Safety - CaIPERS UAAL Amortization
Safety - Liability Insurance
Safety - Worke/s Compensation Costs

77,3t9

30,219
882,415
100,95 t

550
90,744

113,702

Police - Capital Outlay
Fire - Capital Outlay
Direct Capital Outlay - Streets & Parks
Transfers Out - Capital Projects Fund
Transfers Out - Gas Tax Fund

Fire - Personal Services

120,650

4,208
162,9t9

45, I 68

164,336
59,000

32,1t1

64,089

69,7t6

125,963
436,592

227,748

128,848

796,883
2,940,100
2,287,583

53,913
2,720,000

2,520,000
50,000

361,851

60,475
61,504
270,000
273,913
1,430,000

$

2,737,807

8,533,876

5,781,428

7,757,324

Excess (deficit) ofrevenues over expenditures

s

2,315,704

(2,s82,403)

(146,428\

(1,394,824)

Beginning Fund Balance

$

3,176,798 5,492,502 2,910,099

2,763,671

Ending Fund Balance

$

5,492,502 2,9t0,099

t,368,847

2,763,671

Page 172

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Final Budget
Measure E Fund (Fund 200)

Capital Expenditure Detail
Actuel

Actual

F^Y 201&19

FY 2019-20

Mid-Year Budget /
Yeer-End Estimate
FY 2020-2r

Final Budget

Fv 2021-22

Cspitrl Expenditurcs
Police Capital - Vehicles / Buildout
Police Capital - Equipment
Fire Capital - Fire Truck
Fire Capital - Vehicles / Buildout
Fire Capital - Equipment / Radios
64100 - Lyman Gilrnore Field
641 l0 - Park Bathrooms
64130 - Minnie Park / Memorial Park Projects
64140 - Measure E Park Projects / Maintenance
rcOO( - Mautino Park Turf Replacement
)OOO( - Condon Parking Lot Improvement
Trf to Cas Tax6l220 - Annual Sheet Mtc
Trf to Capital 63850 - Measure E Street Projects
Trf to Capital 64100 - Lyman Gilmore Field
Trf to Capital 641l0 - Park Bathrooms
Trfto Capital 61330 - Annual Sreet Rehab
Trf to Capital 64150 - Mernorial Park Pool / Fac
Trfto Capital 63370 - Condon Connector
Trf to capital 63420 - city Hall / GVPD Video
Trfto Capital 63440 - Mill Street Pkg tot
Trfto Capital 63850 - Measure E Park Projects
Trfto Capital 64120 - GV Charter Field Restor.
Trf to Capital XXXX - HSIP Improvements
Trf to Capital XXXX - Slate Creek Drainage

$

98,339

27,624
s2,032
62,126
322,434

80,243
147,505
564,063
213,497

r03,848
25,000

200,000
70,000

8,913

228,9t3

t9,323

45,000

45,000

910,000
300,000
500,000

780,000

1,619,792
27,597
5s7,687
735,024

9,997

650,000
50,000
1,270,000

13,313

336,791
365,000
r0,000

800,000

19,365

r06,598
200,000

2,t61,620

635,000

1,750
50,000
200,000
$

924,406

6,252,314

2,902,761

4,543,913

Fy 2021-22 StafrAllocations - Measwe E Fund:

Police Departrnent - 10.9 FTE
Fire Department - 10.2 FTE

Page 173

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year2OZl-22 Final Budget
Water Fund (Fund 500)

Mid-Yerr Budgct /
Actusls
FY 2018-19

Actuals
FY 2019-20

Ycar-End Estimate

Final Budget

FY 2020-21

FY 2021-22

Revenues:
Wat€r User Fees
Water Connection Fees
Lrase Revenues
Interest Eamings
Miscellaneous Rcvenues

$

2,t l9,l l3
88,143

2,289,82t
I t8,660
47,390

t26,4U

80,000

2,200,000
275,000
50,000
37,500

21,761

t 5,1 58

10,000

10,000

2,544,699

2,55t,029

2,5',t2,500

2,295,000

l 89,1 98

2,200,000
20,000
50,000
15,000

Proceeds ofDebt

Transfers In From Other Funds

$
ExDenditures:
Administration - Personal Services

$

Administation - Non-Personal Services
Plant - Personal Services
Plant - Non-Personal Services
DisEibution - Personal Services
Distribution - Non-Personal Services
CaIPERS UAAL Payment
Workers Compensation Expenses
Debt Service
Information Technology Cost Allocation
Capital Outlay
Capital Expenscs
Transfers Out - Capital Projects Fund

152,502
t88,640
l8l,l75
443,146
104,868
73,883
69,230
13,888
325,s20
2,266
379,945
-

179,380
185,431
t93,2t7
586,749
226,642
165,953
85,895
24,t7't
329,0&
41,579
108,28r
2,349,351
39,042

178,488
185,000
190,000
450,000
170,000
130,000
ll,136
35,000
428,066
39,080
200,000
-

184,009
190,000
169,497
580,000

209,532
140,000

1t,500
35,000

470,7s0
51,800

t,875,000
200,000

$

1,935,063

4,514.761

2.0t6.770

4,1 17,088

Excess (deficit) ofrwenues over expenditurcs

$

609,636

0.963.732)

55s.730

0.822.088)

Beginning Fund Balance

$

4,t56,723

4,766,359

2,802,627

3,358,357

Ending Fund Balance

$

4.766.359

2.802.627

3,358.357

t.536.269

$

148,700

148,700

148,700

148,700

75,000
325,000
360,663
300,000
999-585

75,000
325,000
360,663
300,000

75,000
325,000
360,663
300,000

75,000
325,000
360,663
300,000
244.309

1,593,2@

2,148,994

82,597

Reserved Fund Balance:
Safe Drinking Water l,oan Debt Svc. Reserve
Trustee Cash - Capital kases Payable
Pcnsion Reserve

Working Capital Reservc
Water System Reinvestment Reserve
Emergency Rescrve
Connection Fee Capital Reserve
Unobligarcd Fund Balance

$

2,557,J11

Page 174

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year202l-22 Final Budget
Water Fund (Fund 500)

Capital Expenditure Detail
Mid-Yerr Budgct /
Acturlc
F"Y 20r&r9

Actuels
["Y 2019-20

Yerr-End Estimetc

Find Budgct

F"r 202G21

FY 2021.,2

Ceoitrl Erpenditurcs
Trf Capital 61430 - Financiat System Replcmt
$
Trf Capital 63420 - City Hall / PD S€curity
TrfCapital 63740 - Florcmce Avenue Project
Trf Capital 63900 - Acrid Survey Update
Trf Capital 64150 - Memorial Part CDBG Project
XXXX - Water Line Repl - Linden / Church
65170 - Treatnent Plant Security
65210 - Water Systems PIan
65240 - Empire Water Tutk
65280 - 201I Wder Linc (Dcpot Street)
65300 - Jan/Hill Water Project
65330 - Watcr Treatrnent Plant Maintenance
65340 - Annual Water Systcm Maintenance
65350 - Annud Flushing Program
65230 - Water Ratc Impact Fce Study
65370 - Richardson St Line Replacement

17,t67

34,1M
92,1t8
21,875
200,000
200,000
I 10,248

3,2t4

18,283

12,908

22,270

356,750
137,590
578

25,058

t.725.902

379,945

2.38t.393

190,123

$

100,000
100,000

200,000

10,000
200,000
530,000
150,000
210,000
400,000
100,000
75,000

2.075.000

Page 175

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Finil Budget
Sewer Fund (Fund 510)

Actual

Actuel

FY 20t8-t9

FY 2019-20

Mid-Year Budget /
Year-End Estimate
FY 2020-21

Final Budget
FY 2021-22

Revenues:
Wastewater Service Fees
Industrial Waste Permits
Sewer Connection Fees
Grants
Lease Agreement Revenues
Miscellaneous Revenues
Interest Eamings

$

4,793,659
286,279
358,048
2,606,870
49,472
609
178,262

4,750,000
250,000
400,000
1,246,769

4,750,000
250,000
50,000

5,000
90,000

5,000
40,000

7,548,93 r

6,74t,769

5,095,000

204,500

2l1,802

35r,r93

232,850
325,000
741,295

4,799,868
250,491

t55,347
2,210,005
32,422
100,000

798

Expense Reimbursements

8,800

Gain on Sales of Assets
Transfers In From Other Funds

$

8,28

1,999

Expenditures:
Adminishation - Personal Servrces
Administration - Non-Personal Services

s

Plant - Personal Services
Plant - Non-Personal Services
Collection - Personal Services
Collection - Non-Personal Services
CaIPERS UAAL Payment

Workers Compensation Costs
Debt Service
Information Technologr Cost Allocation
Other Expenses
Capital Outlay - Equipment
Capital Expenses
Transfers Out - Capital Projects Fund

207,629
360,93s
686,306
1,413,339
210,278
52,475

l7t,69l

652,028
1.335.754
261,275
r34,014
203,752

39,t24

325,000
810,000
1,350,000
262,941
70,000
32,675
85,000

1,273,057

1,301,860

r,544,01I

280,263
80,000
33,655
85,000
1,626,435

41,579

39,800

5l,800

999,385
4,229,799
234,138

23,327
1,725,000

2,160,000

6,479,5s6

6,966,298

262,2t3

( r,87 r,298)

39,19t
1,884,557

$ 6,299,458 9,988,40t

1,350,000

Excess (deficit) ofrevenues over expenditures

$

1,982,541 (2,439,470\

Beginning Fund Balance

$

6,368,7t9

8,351,260

5,glL,790

6, I 74,003

Ending Fund Balance

$

8,351,260

5,911,790

6.174,003

4,302,705

Reserved Fund Balance:
Bond Reserve

$

44,512
592,4s7
134,362
116,248
850,000

44,512
587,972
134,362
176,248
850,000
r 75,000

Trustee Cash - Lrases and Other Debt

FHMA Debt Service Reserve
Clenbrook Sewer Improvement Reserve
Working Capital Reserve

44,512

44,5t2

586,r90

586, l 90

134,362

t34,362
850,000
r 75,000
t,735,887
750,000

26,7s4

System Reinveshnent Reserve

175,000
1,735,887

Emergency Reserve
Connection Fee Capital Reserve

750,000
1,537,693

750,000

850,000
175,000
1,735,887
750,000

2,355,10r

r,457,809

1,898,052

Pension Reserve

Unobligated Fund Balance

$

1,735,887

Page 176

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Final Budget
Sewer Fund (Fund 510)

Capital Expenditure Detail
Actuel

Acturl

Mid-Year Budget /
Yeer-End Estimrte

Finel Budget

FY20l&19

FY 2019-20

Fr 2020-21

Fv 2021-22

Crpitd Erpcnditurcs
Trf Capital 61430 - Financial System Replcmt
Trf Capital 6327 0 - Peabody Creek Restoration
TrfCapital 63740 - Florcnce Avenue Project
Trf capital 63420 - wwTP video Project
Trf Capital 63360 - Wolf Creek Trail Project
TrfCapital 53900 - Aerial Survey Update

t7,167

$

15,000
100,000
34,183
r09,904

66170 - WWTP Security Projects
66590 - NPDES 2008-13
56600 - WWTP Fuhre Analysis
66690 - 201 I Sewer Line
56820 - Annual Sewer Maintenance
66890 - Annual WWTP Projects
66910 - GV Sewer System
66920 - Ocean Avenue Replacement
66960 - 2018 WWTP Improvernents Project
66940 - Slate Creek Lift Station
X)Ofi - Lift Station Upgrades
)OOO( - Sewer Rate Study

180,096
27,875
320,971
60,000
6,407

28,2U

1,154,085

14,0,t5

I I I,184

360,7t4

62,681

40,000
2s0,000

200,000
1,300,000

830,423
140,657
264,323

2,568,480

r,350,000

2,064

5,991

50,000
35,000

50,000
450,000
r00,000

$

1.884.557

4-463-937

1,72s,000

2,r60,000

Page 177

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Final Budget
Gas Tax Fund (f,'und 201)

Actuel
FY 20rE-r9

Acturl
FY 2019-20

Mid-Yeer Budget /
Year-End Estimate
FY 2020-2t

Finel Budget
FY 2021-22

Revenucs:
Section 2103 Apportionment
Section 2105 Apportionment
Section 2106 Apportionment
Section 2 107 Apportionment
Section 21 07.5 Apportionment
Road Repair / AccountBbility Act / Loan Repay
Proposition 42 Local Improvemens
LTF / RSTP Funding (NCTC Pass-Through)
Transfers In - Measure E Fund
Interest Earnings

43,567

$

7l,55 I
102,741
89,983
3,000
255,222

t4,'106

88,674
65,600
92,086

82,832
3,000

222,734
t4,457

r 08,657

99, l 38

68, l 65

72,828

98,280
82,003
3,000
206,563

102,219

t4,457

92,623
3,000
24'1,140

4,205
l 50,000

50,000

31,719
$

612,489

6,214

2,500

t,000

575,597

583,625

822,t53

Expenditures:
Capital Outlay - Street Sweeper
Transfers Out - General Fund
Transfers Out - Traffic Safety Fund
Transfen Out - Capital Projects Fund

s
3,000

3,000

3,000

t00,000

t00,000

l 95,000

96.1 83

1.412.682

640,000

3,000
140,000
675,000

$

299.183

1.5 15.682

838,000

8 t 8,000

Excess (deficit) ofrevcnues over expenditures

$

313.306

(940.085)

(254.37s\

4,1 53

Beginning Fund Balance

$

950,5 l l

I,263,8t7

323,732

69,357

Ending Fund Balance

$

1,263,817

323,732

69,357

73,5 l0

1

Capital Expenditure Detail
Actual

Actuel

FY 201&19

FY 2019-20

Mid-Yesr Budget /
Yeer-End Estimrte
FY 2020-2t

Finel Budget
FY 2021-22

Cepitel Erpenditures
Trf to Capital 61220 - Street Maintenance
Trf to Capital 61300 - Dorsey Drive
Trfto Capital 61330 - Sueet Rehab
Trf to Capital 61370 - Signal Maintenance
Trf to Capital 63630 - Annual Sidewalks
Trf to Capital 63350 - Wolf Creek Trail

$

138, l 25

39,850

r 10,000

100,000

6.679

1,34t,231
236
3 l,365

50s,000

550,000

25,000

25,000

r.412.682

640,000

675,000

fi,g5;
33,427

$

196.183

Page 178

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year202l-22 Final Budget
Traffic Safety Fund (Fund202)

Mid-Ycar Budget/

Acturl

Acturl

Ycrr-End Eitimrtc

Fiml Budget

FY20r&19

FY 2019-20

FY 202G21

Ftt 202t-22

Revcnucs:
Parking Citation Rwenue
Transfcr In - Gas Tax Fund
Expcnse Rcimbursemeirts
Interest Eamings

s

r00,000

25,000
195,000

20,000
140,000

t,284

389

100

100

$

l6s,92l

I 34,854

220,100

r60,100

$

t23,399

l 18,s03

80,347

66,706

125,000
60,000

125,000
30,000
1,000

39,637
100,000

34,465

2s,000

Erpcnditures:
Utilities Costs
Profcssional Serviccc / Contacts
Parking Citations

1,001

$

2M.747

l 85.209

r 85.000

156.000

Exccss (deficit) ofrevenues over expenditures

$

(38.E26)

(t0.3ss)

35. I 00

4,100

Beginning Fund Balance

$

56,61I

t?,?t5

(32,570)

2,530

Ending Fund Balance

$

t7,785

(32.5701

2,s30

6,630

Page 179

Item # 8.

Cityof GrrrsYdley

nrcrl Yeln202l-2tr XInrI Budgct
Ftr",e Rp*rve Fund (Fund 203)

Arrrd

ryill&r,

**rrlcr:

f

AcE l

tr1[r]r0

MId"Yurhfrpt/
Ycrr-ErdEdrrt
FrloflGtl

IlrilBI*ct

ntmt-n

m,le

3r?6?

t9,r25

?.511

lJ6l

r.000

1.000

f

5e6ff'

J.728

90.1!5

1,000

f

{0,e45

22,635

21,331

5,000

$

40,t45

&635

2lJ3l

5,0m

Exccss (d.6ai0 ofrrwurp wrr cryeaCiErrr

$

llr38

fl6S07)

6E ?94

(,1,000)

EcairrhSftndBdus

f
f

6?JO{

99.l4t

t ,2r,

I5l,filg

99,l{,

t2r95

15l,ol9

147,W

SuibTcm[crqm
Trurlil Itr -cacnl furd (RssituD
IdcmdErlio3t

Ermrdltnrul
fhc Dcprtmcnt Eryqdifirrg

EodiBFtrtrdBdeq

Page 180

Item # 8.

City of Gns Vellery
mrcct Year 2lXll-il!Fl[3t Budgeil
IIIII Grant Fund Gtuud 2O{)

Acfrl
rr20l&r,

Ml&YcrBuQet/

Y:rErdEdnrh

Achd

FYilI}23

FYt[}&21

nrd Bl{st
FYffiL23

Rrmrrrr:
0ttrrRsvrorg

InffisEuitrg!

56

25

2t

t6

35

x

pJ16)

x

25

Encdfuor
amynrycnAilus

\?:re

zgn

Emi (i&ficiQ of rv*cntp etr ogcoditrc
BqindneFurdBdm

q73I

6,731

4Jr5

{,5/O

FdrBfurdBdmcc

6,Tlt

4J15

4,5{0

4J65

Page 181

Item # 8.

Ci,tf,of Grrre\firlhf
Ftrcd Ycrr 2llll-f;! Fhd Brdgct
EFA, Sttc Gnnt hnd (Fund 205)

rfteftlrBrdg6/
Asnrl

FYmtlr9

AcEd

rY!0r}r0

Ycrr-Eld[drme
rrrtrQ}2r

FtdBre*t
rYgxu-z

f,ommpr

t

l6a,63B

17a759

r04J99

rge,qi,

s

16s.639

t72359

100390

199S65

EPA StE Arac*ncd SrylodihrB

3

lrt690

163.@t

96146

t90-665

F-rc.E (ddcit) of rmnrc orq erpladihno

I

OYJiEI)

9,06E

13.t53

BqinniugFmdBdms

r

t3,170)

wzt)

(t3,153)

EodhsfusdBahnm

s

{Bp3t}

(l3.153]

Srunarru*r

IffiElrntu$

Eilroillrrcr!

Page 182

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Final Budget
Developer Impact Fee Fund (Fund 206)

Actual

Actual

Mid-Yeer Budget /
Year-End Estimote

Final Budget

FY 2018-19

FY 2019-20

Fv 2020-21

FY 2021-22

Revenues:
Local Drainage Impact Fees
Fire Services Impact Fees
Police Services Impact Fees
Admin / General Facilities Impact Fees
Subdivision Map Act Fees
Regional Circulation Impact Fees
Regional Storm Drainage Impact Fees
Parks / Recreation Impact Fees
GV Transportation Improvemcnt Impact Fees
GV Transportation Administrative Fees
Olenbrook Basin Traftic Impact Fees
McKnight Way Recapture lmpact Fees
Interest Eamings

$

30,952

29, l 55

r0,903

32,532

23,233

5 I ,731

13,019

9,231

21,070

15,338

12,657

29.303

4,700
226,352

33,450

76,031
177,220

75,499
78,447

1,603

3,320

189,220
196,684
5,788

86, I 85

5 I,348

5,580
40,000

40,000

469,844

2U.638

802,t 7l

40,000

360.166

310.683

r,r20,000

$

360_166

3 I 0-683

r.120,000

Excess (deficit) ofrevenues over expenditures

s

109,678

(46.04s)

(317.829\

40,000

Beginning Fund Balance

$

2,895,650

3,005,328

2,959,283

2,64t,454

Ending Fund Balance

$

3,005,328

2,959,283

2,641,454

2,681,454

5,31I

$

't9t

ExDenditures:
Police Departnent Capital Outlay
Fire Departrnent Capital Outlay
City Hall / Park Impvmts Capital Outlay
Transfers Out - General Fund
Net Transfers Out - Capital hojecs Fund

$

Capital Expenditure Detail
Actual

Actual

Mid-Year Budget /
Yesr-End Estimete

FY 2018-19

FY 2019-20

FY 2020-21

Finel Budget
FY 202t-22

C1p!!rl Erpenditurcs
Trf Capital 61030 - Ridge / SC / MR Drainage
Trf Capital 61100 - Storm Drain Plan

$
I 50,000

Trf Capital 63300 - East Main Street Impvmt
Trf Capital 63310 - Pickle Ball Courts
Trf Capital 63420 - City Hall / PD Security

(2,941',)

75,426
l 78,368

Trf Capital 63750 - Playground Maintenance
Trf Capital 63770 - McKnight Analysis

45,000

100,100
3,272
3,000

Trf Capital 63970 - East Main Improvements
Trf Capital 63820 - Mason Creek Phase I
Trf Capital 63840 - WI\iUSIC Pcd Impvmets
Trf Capital 63870 - GVTIF Update
Trf Capital 63360 - Wolf Creek Trail

t'|7

800,000
l 70,000

268.U9
$

360.166

3 t 0-683

I.120.000

Page 183

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Final Budget
Developer Impact Fee Fund (Fund 206)

f,'und Balance Detail
Actud

Actuel

Mid-Yerr Budgct /
Ycrr-End Estimetc

Find Budgct

FY 20r&r9

FY 2019-20

FVzutEzt

FY 2021-22

Fund Brhnccr

7t486

73,(x)l

73,Nt

73,00r

Reserve for Local Circulation
Rcserve for local Drainage

449,058

458,439

458,439

r89923

234,122

Reserve for Police Senices

120,078

19,757

458,439
94,659
40,827

35,960

87,691

35,972
774,428

65,275
r.000,780

40,827
87,691
65,275
1.000,780

s72E2
33,s76

246,502

246,502

38276

3t,276

99E,990
20,627
3,691

395,674

395,674

26,4t5

26Ats

4,482

4,482

102

15,630
133.70t
2,681.454

Reserve for Parting In Lieu

s

Reserve for Fire Sewices
Reserve for Admin / General Facilties

62,642

Reserve for Regional Circulation

76t,U2

Reserve for Regional Drainage

146,698
369,26s

Rcscrvc for Parts and Rccreaion
Rescrve for SMA Map Act Fees
Rcscrvc for GVTIF
Reservc for GVTIF Administration
Reservc for Glenbrook Basin
Reserve fot Glenbrook Basin Administsation
Reservc for McKnight Recapture
Unobligated Fund Balance

726,828
I 5,371

3,613
102

$

94,659

149,585

4,620
(25.8s5)

53.701

102
15,630
93.701

2,895,650

2,959,2t3

2,&t,454

10,050

102

Page 184

Item # 8.

City of Grass Yalley
Fiscal Year2021-22 Final Budget
Vehicle Replacement Fund (Fund 225)

Mid-Ycrr Budgct/

Acturl

Acturl

Yerr-End Ertimrtc

Finrl Budgct

FY 201&19

F"Y 2019-20

F"Y 2020-21

FY 2021-,2

RevenueS:
Transfers In - General Fund
Transfcrc In - Mcasure N Fund
Other Rcvcnucs - Surplus Sales
InErest Earnings

$

23,ilo

s200

2,7t8

r,758

26.358

6-958

2929?

33,094

33,0%

33,09r

s

29-297

33-094

33,094

33,094

Excess (dcficit) ofrcvenues over expenditures

$

(2,939\

(26,136)

(33,094)

(33,094)

Beginning Fund Balance

$

99,298

96,3s9

70,223

37,129

Ending Fund Balance

s

96,359

70,223

37,t29

4,035

$

Erpcnditurcr:
Capital Outlay - Vehicle Replacement
Vehicle l.case Expeirses

$

Page 185

Item # 8.

trIty of Grrs Vr[ry
fhrel Ycer fll2l-12 IInd Eodg*t
F- DrEtebPertFund Fnd {50)

Lfilrl
trfilslg

nrtrrrc*
OltcRrrrtulu
IilffiutE&ingr

Mid-TarBr{d/

Ytrr.Ed[drrh

,l.trrl

ffilr'.il

Fr!00&ll

Fhd4!t

FY2ML2'

$

e9{0

!.t07

a000

1.000

2T40

t"20?

4000

1.000

hrdtrru:
MBsrfiliurns

*

f
Exscec (dffisit) oftumrns ovrr uryanditurc

3

2,9{0

xJo7

2,000

1.000

Bqimhgftndklogc

t

96rfr4

9SJ04

r0ldlr

r03JII

EodiugfirdBdmoc

i

gcl0{

lot-tr

10!t-4ll

l0*{ll

Page 186

Item # 8.

Ctty of Grrss VdtGy

ftucrl Yar 2021-31Fhrl Budgot
fiimrl ELdhr fund (Bund 451)

Iffd-Y:rr Bu{;rt/

tcfirl

fcfid

Yrer-EldDdnrrc
FYr0r0.lr

FYr0t$ro

T'Y 2OILI

nldBrtlt
rY!{t2l{t

novcnucri

f

OOcrRo,caucc

ffiEmingr

t

9ll

353

250

n5

9ll

3t3

,50

t25

ErpcflE&nps

PotiooEqffir$c

s

t4,492

Tdto Clpitrl - 63{20 - City IIdl /GVF$ Sccority

0-586

ufit

3
Enccrs (ffioit) of rwrlucs

elr c*Fditua

oll

rr3 n5r

7s0

t25

Bdnniqg FtrtrdBdsncr

$

29,e8

30,739

7"0u

?w

Edlngfr&dBalmcc

T

30.?39

7Jl4

7afi

7Jt9

Page 187

Item # 8.
City of Grrss Vellcy
Fbcel Ycrr 2021-22 Finel Budgct
Crpit t Projcce Fund (Fund 3fl1)

ltt&YsBu|llr/

Acbtl

Actud

rY2,0llt9

Fv il[9-rx,

f,re!
Fed6d Aid / FEMA

YceEdd E lhrt

wm,,,.rt

Fi!.| Brd!.t
rY m21-2'

50,000

Misc. lnlorgovmfi&l Rrvaw

E6,966

RSTP FEditr8

826,682
t25,000
5,262

390,000

CARES Act FEdio8

52,94t

l05,t9t

PSPS&ad(CdOES)

230.000
502,910

64,400

LTF Fuding-NCTC

l|fi*olmuGmts

CMAQ / SRF / HSIP / ATP Mirc Grul

Ga6l ExpGcRlinbusma

Rqos

t9,437

4J,000

1,436,M6

2,t55

LwaeRcimbwtr/ Pryruts
lffiEtEmirur

307.9t0
(10,3m)

Tmsf6 In - Mcw E Fud

442,276
9,996

Truf6ln-CimlFurd

Tmf6ln. CETa Fud

ilx.lt4

Tmf6 lo - Mitiglrion Fe F6d

360,166
202,O57

4St,SO;

t62,Zts

E5,mO

22t1,5t3

2,720,WJ

2,52q000

1J12,683
310,6t3
88,959

6.rc,00O

6?5,000

Tmfss In - Watar Fud

t26,372

39,U2

Tmfmln-ScgqFmd

244,O47

zA,t31

Tmf6ltr- Atrird Shdt6 Fud

1.120,000
I,612,039
200,000

9,Jt6

CDBG FDdinS

4_mo-mo

t

1,9$-t3l

6,617,1x5

6,909,622

t,916,046

Crrltd helrt! EltodltuE:
6l l0o - Slom Dnh Pl8
61220 - 2009 StEt Mrinto8B

t5q0oo

kojq*

r37,565

37,396

I 10,000

t00,000

61330 - Amud Str*l RdEbilirrdm

uo,7r,

1,470,046

895,000

550,000

6t360. Auud slom DEin Mdntaee

a3,427

66,115

25,000

35,000

61370 - Amud SiSnd

Mriitaile

236

61380 - OOVlD.lg Expodituro

89,675

51390 - PSPS Gat Projdr

6t,787
35,907

61410 - Puuic Edwd6 / OuEtri Prcjcci

7,79t

61430-FimidS}!tmn plffit
61450- Momid Put P@l Rmrdin

1,668

2@,334

30,000
7,000

62510 - NCTC Plmirg

1t75

,,220

3,000

63240 - CABY Wdf Crc* WS

63fiO - Stsm D.orgo i R.D!iR

7tt,l09

5t 7t2

5,576

63270 - Pabody CrcGt R6tordi@

4,792

500,t01

50,0m
r00,000

63300 - E Msir / Murphy lmprcvctMrr
63310 - PicUc Brll Prcjct

190,552

63340 - NE Sidcwslk

500,763

4,tE?

63350 - Wolf CEt Tnil Proj*t Study Report

5,,14E

4,998

Cct Tnil Ptre I

636,102

,84,310

63360 - \t/olf

63370 - Codm Cqnoctor

6:t3to - C,8 Vdky Ealrea SiSn

63lo0-CQdsP!*Affi
63420 - Ciry Hdl / GVPD Sryirf,
63.140 - Mill

6,97t

lqttJ

t@,295

63O2

!6,736
t06,34

l6l,lt4

6,031

I I,il40

35,m0

27t,W

49.400

5oo,o(n

Stsr PatinS l.ot

63450 - Mccourtxy Rord Pod lmp

292,5@

475,000

10,000

6,10,fi6

35,62n

25,m0

25.000

55

50,000

50,000

fl;

I70,0oo
t,000,mo

137q000

t,964

63570 - Ridurdlo Str..{ Litrc R@lffit
63630 - Amul Sidildl Rcprin / Maiatare

18,310

61740 - Flom@ Avaw PDj*t

192,1t8

63750 - PhrxrcEd Mrirtqw

22t,698

63770 - McKtri8hl

Prcjsc
Ard!!i! PrcjEr

t,t77

63t20 - MIr@ Crc!& Ib!€ I
63t50 - M6W E Stl.. Rdpbilitrtim

9,6tt

63900 - Aqid Swcy Updlt!

2,170,t9r
125,72a

63970-EMdnlmprcv.m8

3,000

Mimi!/Mowid PaL PrciElt
641,!0 - Mru
E Pst Prc,rcE
64150 - CDBG Mffiid Pst Frility Iopv
6,4130 -

5t0,000
640,000

5,mo,000

66950 - Wolf Crc.t Tdl Phe I

60,tt6

)OOq - HSIP Improvffit3
x)O0( - Slatc Cr6[ Dminagc

300,000

2m mo

3

3 752 186

Ercs (dcfcia) of Evac ovq GFditrc

s

(r-777-25st

BegimingFudBrle

3

(655,1

Endi4Fud Bdrc

I

1241a1721

17)

I 562 715

5.53t-670

t-054-420

t.377-952

(2,432,3721

(t,377.952'.)

8-916.045

ll 177 gSa\

Page 188

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year202l-22 Final Budget
Special Projects Fund (Fund 310)

Mid-Yerr Budgct/
Actuel

Acturl

Yeer-End Esfimrte

Finel Budget

Fv20l&19

F.Y 2019-20

F"v 2020-21

FV 2021-22

Rcvenucr:
ht€rgovemmental Rcvenue
RTMF Reimbuncrnents

695,000

$

t23,354

IntErest Eaming$

62,181

25.000

10,000

500

$

l t5,535

720.000

10.000

500

$

9,250

Erpcnditurcc:
Streeb Matsrids Cogts
Purchase ofProperty

1,006,207

Captial Outlay - Parking Lot Constuction
Trf to Capital 63260 - Storm Damagc Repairs
Trfto Capital 53380 - Entrance Sign
Trfto Capital 63430 - South Aubum Pkg Lot
Trf ro Capital 63/t40 - Mill Sreet Pdldng

106,323

1,319,539

st97;
3,760

?5,223
23
r3.713

292.500

$

2l 1307

1,095,166

1,612,039

Excess (dcficit) ofrcvenues over expenditures

I

Q5,772)

(37s,166)

(1,602,039)

500

Beginning Fund Balance

$

2,051,510

2,025,738

t,650,572

48,533

Ending Fund Baluce

$

2,025,738

r.650.572

4E,533

49.033

lrt

Page 189

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Ye*2021-22 Finel Budget
Whispering Pines Improvement District - L&L Fund (Fund 210)

Mid-Yeer Budget /
Actual
FY 201&19

Acturl
['Y 2019-20

Yer-End Estlmate
FY 2020-21

Final Budget
FV 2021-22

Rcvenucc:
23, l 55

23,7r0
750

24,997
500

25,397

971
$

24.t26

24.460

25.497

25.462

$

674

408

647

@7

l,tt8
9,294
240

t3,33?
9,278
240

10,000
7,500

10,000
33,500

250

250

$

22,W6

23263

rE,397

44,397

Exccss (dcficit) ofrevenues over expendifures

$

2,030

t,197

7,100

(18.93s)

Beginning Fund Balance

$

31,898

33,928

35,125

42,225

Ending Fund Balance

$

33,928

35,125

4222s

23,290

Assessments

s

Interest Eamings

65

Erpcnditurer:
Personal Services

Operating Materials

urilitics
Gilside Services
Ottro Expenditures

I

Page 190

Item # 8.

City of Gress Valley
Fiscal Year202l-22 Final Budget
Litton Business Park Improvement District - L&L Fund (Fund 211)

Acturl
FY 20t&19

Acturl
r"Y 2019-20

Mid-Ycar Budgct /
Ycrr-End Estimrtc
FY 2020-2t

Finel Budget
Ftt xt2t-22

Rcvcaner:
Assessments

5,331

5A59
400

5,628
300

5,7t7

7B
$

6,040

5,859

5,92t

5.757

$

299

633

400

4E9

$

Interest Eamings

40

Erpcnditurcc:
Personal Services
Opcr'ating Materials

Utilities

2,51I

2,753

Oubide Servioes

5,7t6

5,853

1,500
15,500

4,500

Other Expenditures

226

226

228

228

$

8-t52

9_455

t'7,62E

6,717

Excess (deficit) ofrevenues over expenditures

$

(2,7t2)

(3,606)

0 1,700)

(960)

Bcginning Fund Balance

$

23,738

2t,026

t7,420

5,720

Ending Fund Balance

$

21,026

t7420

5,720

4,760

r,500

Page 191

Item # 8.

Cttyof Grrs \Irllcry
Hrcel Yer2llll-2il ffnrl Budgd
Moryen Rrnch Imprwoncnt IXcffi - I*L fund Gund 2f2)

tffud

rvatlsl,

*rrurc*
Aescsffi
tutrtErmiryl

t

tuhl

FYilT}'O

Itliril-Ycr Bodgct/
YcerErd Edtrrtc

rril&rr

fhrlhd3Gt

YY*il-n,

Itl

23,5E5
150

2{415

!{,t08

30

30

f

23Jt6

23.t35

?4.U5

24.E33

3

ffis

135

515

503

t0,613
1L399

&56f

?,000

6r00

ouilri& ScrYioa

5"001

rq000

[email protected]

?t2

2,,r2

3m

15,m0
300

s

23.969

13.90{

19.t15

2r,303

EtisGEs (ds6ci$ of rcwmu uiu qpEdihtr€8

I

(613)

9.841

4.6t0

2.r30

EegimingFmdEdarco

$

4527

3,94{

15,785

20,115

EulingrdBdre

t

5-944

lr-rt5

30,415

n945

23,132

Erpcrdliuru;

hrudStrvig

Opcrdngtt Gi.b
LftiliEct

Page 192

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Yeu202l-22 Final Budget
Ventana Sierra Improvement District (Fund 213)

Mid-Yerr Budgct/

Acturl

Actuel

Yeer-End Estimetc

Finel Budgct

I"Y 201&19

F.Y 2019-20

Ftt 20zL2t

FY 2021-22

Rcvcnues:

4,732
262

3,100

3,100

3,100

150

100

40

$

4,994

3,250

3,200

3,140

$

494

228

490

490

2,48E
1,596

2lt0

2,000

ll0

ll0

2,000
2,000

ll0

ll0

s

4.588

4,391

4,600

4,400

Excess (deficit) ofrevenues over expenditures

$

305

0.141)

0.400)

fl.260)

Beginning Fund Balance

$

8,753

9,059

7918

6,5r8

Ending Fund Balance

$

9,059

7,918

6,518

5,25t

Assessments

$

Interest Eunings

Eroenditurcs:
Personal Services

Operating Matcrials

utilities
Oubide Scrvices
Other Expendiures

1,543

t,800

Page 193

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Ye*2021-22 Final Budget
Scotia Pines Improvement District (Fund 214)

Actuel

Acturl

Mid-Ycrr Budget/
Ycrr-End Estimrtc

Finrl Budgct

FY 201&19

FY 2019-20

FY 2020-2r

FV 2021-22

Rcvcnucr:
3,655

3,740

3U

t00

$

3,999

$

3,855

3,917

3,840

3,E55

3,9t7

t,419

1,031

250

287

1,339
6,137

I,159

t7,716

1,000
750

7,4N

228

22t

230

230

$

9.123

20.134

2,230

8,917

Exccss (deficit) of revenues over expcnditures

$

(5,124)

(t6,294)

r,625

(s,000)

Beginning Fund Balance

$

l lJ93

6,269

(r0,025)

(8,400)

Ending Fmd Balance

$

6,269

(r0,025)

(8,400)

(r3,400)

Asscssments

$

Int€rcst Eamings

Erpcnditurcs:
Personal Services

Opercing Materials
Utilities
Outside Sen/ic€s
Othcr Expenditures

1,000

Page 194

Item # 8.

Ctty of Gre*s Vrltcy
FtuoI Ycrr l02l-2jl llnrl Budgct
Morgrn Rruc-L zflfi}.f Imprerenent lllstrct - MA Gud 215)

Ln'Y

iftl-YarBrdgrt/
Yan-SrdEddta

tullrl

Actril
r0r&19

FY20l9-t!0

rvmt&u

IlErl Buftd
['Y 20t]lrt

f,lrvrrnsrt

Alsoms
IffiEatiqE

t

zJ?s
6fl|

I,m0
am

r300

r300

100

300

3

7-7i18

t-20d

13011

1.t00

3

*"

28t

*:

Drrcdtunx
Fcrturl Elrvica

Opcrdrylrtmtrlr
uilities

q6lt

Outslde SEiliEGo

!lt

2,500
215

10,000

LI;
n

r00

6.604

3.000

10.100

hur (ddd$ of remrn m GryEodiiru

r

2J78

&40d)

fl.700)

0"000)

EoginoingFurdk

T

10,r60

x3,038

It 6&f

r693f

EndiryftldBrlmce

T

er.mt

l&6}1

1693{

?,9t4

OttcrExpadinrrls

2t,

Page 195

Item # 8.

City of Grasr Yrlley
Filcrl Yogr2Wl-22 Ftnd Budgot
Morgnn Bench SIcatBAD (Fund 116)

Asturt

Actud

Fvl0l&19

Frmt9-20

Mt&YcrrBudgct/
Ycrr.Erd Er$nete
IY gll{lL2r

Ftnrl Budg*

PY2tlrt-!j!

*cvctrucrr

&taffi

\175

2W

l'2oo

tJ00

391

300

l5{t

lt0

i

Lsffi

?J27

l3r0

rJ50

I

T

768

3r5

315

5,625
213

2,500

&670

?rx

2]5

xt5

501

6605

3.030

9J00

2-065

(4-rr9l

fl-6t0)

o-850)

12307

t4372

10,s3

E 613

l43rJ

r0393

t 613

763

s

ImffiEunimt

Erpcdltrrc:
PE rmrl Scffiocs

Opcrainglr,iehlc
udliriB
OuEi& Ssviocs
OttsrBtpeaditurcr

f
Ercorr (doffcit) of rweors oycr ccrycoditrrcr

BcgiodryfindBalmte
eindingFuod Bdrooa

s
t

Page 196

Item # 8.

City of Grrs Vallcy
Fircrl YerirZULl4,2 Ftual Budgot
Morgrn Rsnch llYut Impnovoment IHcHet - I*L Gund 217)

A(fid

Act&rl

FYAlllt,

tr201$m

ItffGYcerEudgptl
YanrEnd Ertbete

Fr2um.fl

HrrlEd$t
I.rtBl-20

R*vcrnar
Asrcsmarti

ImEamingp

s

s

1,47t

r00

t00

500

7t2

150

lm

l0

1,690

950

600

5r0

3,29

It0

lg,

lll

100

ErDGrdltuiift

kssnlScrciccl

N

OpcaingMdErids

urilitu

9t

Oucido Strvioco

r00
3,500
220

2t3

2rt

3

3lr

6s3

500

4,000

kcrcs (drficif) of rrvcnrs wr opeuditrro

s

t37C

xv,

100

(3.490)

BoghningFtmd Balmco

s

6646

8,@5

8312

8,4211

FadingFudBdanoc

0

t o25

83r2

t.422

4.932

OtftorErpcadiunc

";

Page 197

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year202t-22 Final Budget
Ridge Meadows Improvement District - L&L (Fund 218)

Actuel

Acturl

Mid-Ycrr Budgct/
Ycrr-f,nd Ertimrtc

Finel Budget

t"Y 201&19

F.r 2019-20

FY202G!t

FY202tA2

Revenocc:

9,14

9,tu

9,144

9,tM

324

300

2s0

250

$

9,468

9,444

9,394

9,394

$

620

536

s24

524

Utilities
Oueide S€rvic€s

il1

633
7,393

550
7,500

12,000

Other Expenditures

219

219

220

220

$

t,4t6

8.781

8.794

t3,294

Excess (deficit) ofrevenucs over expenditures

$

79E2

663

600

G.e00)

Beginning Fund Balance

$

t,3E7

16,369

t7,032

17,632

Ending Fund Balance

$

l6-369

t7^032

17,632

t3,732

Assessments

$

Intc,rcst Eamings

Erpenditurcc:
Personal Services
Operating Materials

550

Page 198

Item # 8.

City of Grerc Vdloy

ftud Y as 2W\-22 Finel Bufiet
Xidgo Mcdoxr BAD (Fund 219)

nfl&Y€rEdgct/
YcrnEdErdurto

*Ghd

AchE!

F'r20r&r9

FYmr}il)

rsgn&fl

f,lnd Budgct

FYmal.Zt

Prrarral

I

3gt

3,Wr

3,gvt

3997

143

i5{,

r00

100

f

4.1,l*0

4"14?

4"097

4,09?

f

2t8

188

302

302

2t9

219

2t5

213

t

tw

401

5r7

7,597

F.w(&fieitlofrmmmova@m

3

&6t3

3J46

3.fm

(lJm)

StoningFurd Brlmsc

I
f

3,653

7N

ll,0t1

14,612

73t6

1L032

r4.612

ll.l12

AgEcmGoE

IffiEttrio8!
Drnrdrrtre
Parud Scrviors
optrdinsMdcdlb

WIi&s
ftmidoSlrviw

7,0t0

Otncrnrycadiuns

P.iitingFtmdBdre

Page 199

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Ye*2021-22 Final Budget
I)owntown Assessment District Fund (Fund770)

Mid-Yer Budgct /
Actual

Acturl

Yerr-End Egtimrte

Fiml Budgct

r.Y20r&r9

FY 2019-20

FY 2020-2r

Fy 2021-xz

Revcnucll
Downtrown Assessments
Interest Eaming

s

63,147
423

51,791

55,000

55,000

36r

100

100

$

63,570

52.159

55,100

55,100

s

6s300

30,000

56,t21

60,000

$

65'400

30,000

56,821

60,000

Excess (defcit) ofrevenues over expendihucs

s

0.830)

22,159

(r.721)

(4,900)

Beginning Fund Balance

$

4,393

2,s63

24,722

23,001

Ending Fund Balance

3

2,563

24,722

23,001

lE,l0l

Erpenditurcr:
DTA Community Contribution
Other Expenditures

Page 200

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Yetr202l42 Final Budget
Grass Valley Successor Agency Fund (Fund 780)

Mid-Ycrr Budget /
Acturl

FY20l&19

Acturl
Ftt 20t9an

Ycr-End f,itimrte
Ftt z0ztt-zt

Finel Budgct
Fn 2021-22

Rcvenucr:
RPTTF Revenue
Othcr Revenues
Interest Earnings
Transfer In from RORF Housing Fund

l,081,387

829,623

650,000

650,000

37,342

25,229

25,000

12,500

10,000

10,000

7,6t0

1,12t,729

t64,t52

6t2,610

662,s00

35,000
15,000
597,672

35,000
15,000

774,526

Erpcnditurcs:
47,U3

61,165

26,039

12,64

734,7?5

536,938
695,000

80E,657

1.305.767

u7,672

824,526

Exccss (deficit) ofrcvenues over expenditures

320,072

(440815)

34,938

(r62.026)

Bcginning Fund Balance

874,020

1,t94.w2

753,177

788,1 l 5

1.t94.@2

753-177

788,1 l5

626,089

Pcrsonal Services
Non-Personal Services
Debt Payments
Transfer to Speioal Projects Fund (ROPS Ob.)

Ending Fund Balance

Page 201

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year2O2l-22 Final Budget
02-HOME-0586 Fund (Fund 230)

Mld-Ycrr Budget /

Actu!l

Acturl

Ycer-End Estlmrtc

Fiml Budget

FY201&19

FY 2019-20

FY tnzo-2r

FV 2021-22

Rcvcnues:
Program Income Revenues
Interest Earnings / Accrued Interest

15,343
65,000

29,536

68,942

s0,000

50,000

6t,942

80.343

79.536

50.000

68,942

80,343

79,536

50,000

ts343

44,879

u,879

4.2872W

4.307.ffi4

4357.6@

$

$

Erpenditures:
loans Provided

$

Administrative Expenses
$
Excess (dcficit) ofrevenues over expenditurcs

$

Program Income / Cash Balance:

$

lnan Receivable Balance:

I

4.270.278

Page 202

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Final Budget
09-HOME-6272 Fund (Fund 231)

Mid-Yerr Budget /
Actual

Acturl

FY 201&19

FY 2019-20

Ycrr-End Estimrte
Fv 2020-2t

Finrl Budget
FY 202142

Rcvcnucs:
Grant Revenues
Ioan Payofrs
Interest Eamings / Accrued lnterest

$

77,510

$

I 1,659

t4,794

7,000

7,000

I 1,659

92,304

7,000

7,000

Erpcnditurcs:
Lnans Provided

$

Administative Expenses
$
Excess (dcficit) of revenues over expendiures

$

I 1,659

92JM

7.000

7.000

Program lncome / Cash Balance:

$

91,077

85,304

91,077

9t,077

loan Rcoeivable Balance:

$

472,51r

398,437

405,437

4t2437

Page 203

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley

f iscal Year 2021-22 Final Budget
12-HOME-8564 Fund (Fund 232)

Acturl
r"r 2019-20

Actuel
FY 201&19

Mid-Yeer Budget /
Ycer-End Ectimrtc

rY 2020-21

Finel Budgct
FY 2021-22

Revcnucs:
Crant Revenues
lnan Payofrs
Interest Eamings / Accrued Interest

$

$

12.584

76,395
12.550

12,000

12,000

12,584

88,945

12,000

t2,000

1,834

l5

Erpenditurer:
loans Provided

$

Administrative Costs
Transfcrs Out to Other Funds

61,349
$

61.349

l-834

l5

Excess (deficit) ofrevenues over expendifurcs

$

(48,765)

87,1 I I

I I,985

12,000

Program Income / Cash Balance:

$

-

81,944

81,930

81,930

L,oan Reccivable Balance:

$

,169,167

396,225

408,225

420,225

Page 204

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year202l-2,2 Final Budget
IIOME Grant Fund (Fund 233)

Actuel

Acturl

Mid-Yerr Budgct /
Ycrr-End Estimete

FY 20lt-19

FY 2019-20

rY 202G2r

Final Budgct
Fv z02t-22

Revenucs:
Grant Rev€nues
Recapturc / Re-Use Fecs / Loan Payoffs
Interest Eamings / Accrued Interest

$

270,s98
4.E50

10-000

75,613
10,000

10,000

s

275-448

l0-000

85,613

10,000

$

77,3M

229,988

r0,681

10.854

10,795

$

88,02s

240,E42

t0.795

Excess (deficit) ofrevcnues over expenditurcs

$

187,423

(230.8/.2\

74,818

10,000

Prograrn Income / Cash Balance:

$

262,446

29,323

93,932

93,932

loan Receivable Balance:

s

607,191

849,983

7W,370

794,370

Erlrcnditurcr:
L,oans Provided

Transfers Out

Administrative Expenscs

Page 205

Item # 8.

City of Grass Yalley
Fiscal Year202l-22 Final Budget
99-HOME-0369 Fund (Fund 234)

Acturl

Acturl

F'Y 201&19

FY 2019-20

Mid-Yerr Budget /
Yeer-End Estimcte
FY 2020-21

Finrl Budgct
Fn 2021-22

Rcvcnucg:
Crant Revenues
t oans Paid Off
Interest Earnings / Accrucd Intcrcst

$

$

63,tt7

74,853
6.061

5.000

5,000

5,000

80.914

5.000

68,1 l7

5,000

5,000

68.fi1

5.000

551

63,668

63,668

4t2,sl4

367,514

372,514

Erpenditurer:
Loans Provided
Transfers Out
Bad Debt Expensc

$
78,908

Administmtive Expenses
$

78.908

Excess (deficit) ofrevenues over expenditures

$

2,006

Prograrn Income / Cash Balance:

$

L,oan Rcccivabte Balsrcc:

3

411,815

Page 206

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Final Budget
00-HOME-0461 Fund (Fund 235)

Mid-Ycer Budget/

Acturl

Acturl

Yeer-End Estimrte

FY 201&19

F.Y 2019-20

F.Y 2020-21

Finel Budget

w 2021-22

Revenues:
Grant Revenues
Ioan Payoffs
Transfers In
Interest Eamings / Accrued Interest

$

$

47,524

47,524

47,524

47,524

47,524

47.524

47.524

47.524

Erpcuditurcs:
L,oans Provided

s

Transfen Out

39,2@

Bad Debt Expense
Adminisfative Experues

Excess (deficit) ofrevenues overexpenditures

$

39,264

$

8,260

47,524

47,524

47,524

$

1.683.277

l-730-801

t.778.325

1.E25.849

Progam Incom€ / Cosh Balance:

Loan Receivable Balance:

Page 207

Item # 8.

Ctty of Grrca Y*lley

Ifrcd Yer2ll21-2E Bind Budget
IIIFEOMF-1{968 hnd (Fund It6)

tdurt

Aciul

FY 101&1,

FY!019.20

Itfld.Yorrf,u*pt/
Yar-EndEl&mb

ffmilF2r

finrtB@Gt
F',r!0,!142

Btvcnuc*

GrrdRcc.mr$
InmPSrofr

$

500,000

3

ffi.000

T

475.000

Tla*nIn

IoHetEaaiaes/Acorudlffi

Erpcrilturol
LooPluri&d
TrmrfurO[
BdDffErqGcEr

Adnhic*iwEryasa

Exclrs (doffoit) ofrwenuer ovcr curpcndinme

4.000

31.000

I

4.000

496.000

$

(4.000)

{"000

PlogrrnIocffrc/CSBalmoc:
Lao RoeivabkBclace

t-

475.p00

Page 208

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year2021-22 Final Budget
04-STBC-1960 Fund (Fund 240)

Acturl

Acturl

Mid-Ycrr Budget/
Yerr-End f,rtimrte

Finrl Budgct

FY20l&19

FY 2019-20

r"Y 202{L2r

Ftt 2021-22

Rcvenucr:
Grant Revenues
Ioan Payoffs
Transfers In
Interest Earnings / Accrued Intercst

$

s

314

314

3t4

314

886

782

782

782

1,200

1,096

1,096

1,096

Erpcnditurcs:
toans hovided

$

Transfers Out
Bad Dcbt Expstrs€

1,200

Administrative Expenses
$

1,200

Excess (deficit) ofrcvenues over expenditures

$

1.096

r.096

t.096

Program lncome / Cash Balance:

$

1,096

2,192

2,974

loan Receivable Balancc:

$

270,829

270,srE

270,2M

27r,146

Page 209

Item # 8.

City of Grass Yalley
F'iscel Year202l-22 Final Budget

CDBG Fund (Fund24l)

Mid-Ycrr Budgct /
Actuel

Actue!

Ycrr-End Estimrtc

r.r 2018-19

FY 2019-20

FY 2020-21

Finel Budget
FV 2021-22

Rcvcnues:
Grant Revenues

$

LomPayoft
Transfers In
Intercst Earnings / Accrued Int€rest

06)
$

(16)

Erncnditurcc:
Loans Provided
Transfcrs Out
Bad Debt Expense

s
(6,960)

Administative Expenses

(6.960)

$
Exccss (deficit) ofrevenues over expenditures

$

06)

Program Income / Cash Balsnce:

s

(l.640)

lnan Receivable Balancc:

s

6,960

(l.640)

(8.59I)

(8-59t)

Page 210

Item # 8.

City of Grass Velley
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Final Budget
CDBG Revolving f,'und (Fundz0)

Acturl
FY20r&19

Actud

Mid-Ycr Budgct/
Ycrr-End Estimrte

t"Y 2019-20

Fyzozvzt

Finrl Budgct
Ftt 2021-22

Rcvcnucg:
Crant Revenues
loan Payofrs
Transfers In
Intercst Earnings / Accrucd lnterest

$
864

40,864

45,254

$

5,467

3,883

3,883

3,883

50,721

4,747

4,747

44,747

Exoenditures:
Inans hovided

$

Transfcrs Out
Bad Debt Expense

I 10,000

l0,7lt

r0.083

l.500

1.500

$

l0,7lE

10,0E3

1,500

l I 1,500

Excess (deficit) of revenues over expenditures

$

40,003

(5.336)

3.247

(66.753)

Program Income / Cash Balance:

$

7t-s70

66.213

69460

2,707

toan Receivable Balance:

$

539,010

539,17r

537,498

49E,307

Adminisuative Exp€nses

Page 211

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscrl Year202l-?,2 Final Budget
CDBG Revolving Loan Fund (Fund 243)

Mid-Yerr Budgct /
Actuel

Acturl

r"Y 20lE-I9

FY 2019-20

Ycer-End Estimetc
FY202G2r

Finrl Budgct
FY 202142

Rcvenucc:
Grant Revenues

s

loan Payoft

30,u2

98,942

@,s60

r0,000

Transfers In
Interest Eamings / Accrued Intcrest

7.9t9

7.500

7.000

7.000

37,94t

t06,442

71,560

17,000

$

ErDetrditurg:
Loarc Provided
Transfcrs Out

$
170,000

Bad Debt Expense

74t

292

750

750

$

74t

292

750

170,750

Exccss (deficit) ofrevcnues over cxpenditures

$

37,200

105,150

70,810

053,750)

Program Incomc / Cash Balancc:

3

60,E75

165.329

229.t39

4,579

Ioan Receivable Balance:

$

279,794

r81,697

tt7,t37

t07,137

Administrative Expenses

Page 212

Item # 8.

City of Gnro Valley
sr 2Ull,-2,1, Finel Budget
CDBG Eoudng Fund (f'und 244)

FiBcaI Y

ACfud

Frill&lt

Actrl

Itttd-Ycrr Brftc{/
Yar-DadEduE

Fr20l+20

FYAEG2I

Itlnl Brdtct
wg0,,t-t

RGvcLre

GrantRmucr

s

IrflnP$.ots

16,00;

52,8i7

16000

5,,,,57

Tramtm Itr

I[ffi Euoingt /Apcrucd lntcrrd

i
Ermdurlrr
Lc.nB PlrYidcd

Tr@sO$

s
65,000

B{dDdtEry.tr$
Adudniltr{ivc Erp@Gr

I

65.000

Excw (&ftci$ of rwcnrra ovcr cxpaditns

3

16000

52.857

(65,000)

Prpgruhomr/CrSBrlarcr:

I

16000

6t,&t7

3351

Lom Rracir*lc Bdmoq

8

73,060

57,W

Page 213

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Final Budget
86-STBG-217 Fund (Fund 245)

Mid-Yerr Budget /
Acturl

Acturl

Yerr-End Estim.tc

Finrl Budget

FY 201&19

F,Y 2019-20

Fv zo20-21

FV 2021-22

Rcvcnnes:
Grant Revenues
Loan Payoffs
Transfers In
ht€rest Eamings / Accru€d Interest

$

2,339
53

$

2,392

Erpcnditurcc:
Loans Provided
Transfers Out
Bad Debt Expense

$

2,392

Administruive Expenses
$
Excess (deficit) ofrevenues over cxpcnditures

$

hogram Income / Cash Balance:

$

loan Receivable Balance:

$

2,392

37

37

37

37

Page 214

Item # 8.

Ctty of Gm Vellcy
Ficcel Ycer202l-22 Find Budget
9f€TBCr{67 Fund (fund 2ad)

Mid-YarBud3ct/
Actrrl

FrffiDD

Actuet

rYil!'.ao

Yerr-EldErtuG

Frffil-tr

FIndhdS:t

wrfil-n

Rovilltrc

GrdIsrru
LmPqpft
Tru#rIn

3

tnUu* Ermingr / Anrnnd Intmst

t

1,600

806

49,ifl6

109

{00

350

2,009

1305

49.176

Erpdfrm*
LousPMi&d

s

TIf[serB Ort
Brd D.ttE.ptmf,G

1,600

50,000

s

1.600

50.000

s

M

,{dmioirtrtireErqcm

Erocrs (d.fictt) cf rEmra ov€r qcoditrcs

Prlgnm hcotrtc I &S Brhn*:

Iam Rcoht&tsBalnnpo:

I

il9-92,

tJ06

49:n6

(5U000)

lo? I

5tr497

497

49r50

Page 215

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Final Budget
95-STBG-897 Fund (Fund 247)

Acturl

Acturl

FY 201&19

FY 2019-20

Mid-Ycar Budgct /
Yeer-End Esdmetc
FY 2020-2r

Finel Budgct

Ftt 2021-22

Rcvenucs:
Grant Revenues
toan Payoffs
Transfers In
Interest Eamings / Accrued Intcr€st

$

$

3,588

1,872

3,000

3,000

957

900

900

900

4-54s

2-772

3,900

3,900

Elpcrditurcs:
Loans hovided

$

Transfos Out

3,588

5,000

3,s88

s,000

Bad Debt Expcnse

Administrative Expenses

$
Excess(deficit)ofrevenuesoverexpenditurcs

$

Program Income / Cch Balance:

$

loan Rcceivablc Balance:

$

957

28,007

2,772

3,900

(1,100)

3232

6,000

1,832

25,501

22,501

19,501

Page 216

Item # 8.

Cltyof GnrrYelley

triscd Ycrr 2021-22 fiml Budget
9?-SIBG.UI8 Fund (Fund 24t)

Ili&YarDr$ci/

AEtEI

rYflITTg

&mrrc*
OmtRmucc

Loehpe

Actrd

rYilr}-2o

Yer-8d Eltut;
Ff 2m&il

md[r{Fl
rTfll!t.2a

I
70,s50

Trurfoiltr
Inffiti Ernintl / Accncd Luc*

J

t2ts

lj,jtS

lJ75

t375

70,530

Erucdlturll:
hutrProYi&d

Trsfo!Ort

I
70,000

Btd Dcbt E$rilsc

ffdnffivcErp@cs
7q000

3

hoocs (dcficit) of rmucs q,Gr @Goditrcs

t

Progrmhmc/CrrhBrluce:

i

Loor RcoeivSlc Bdmoe

3

l3?5

&292

7-?rrs

70Jt0

fi0"000)

70.550

550

70.571

Page 217

Item # 8.

Cityof GrasValley
Fiseal Y.artr02l-24 Finel Budget
99-STBC-X362 B'unil (.Fund 249)

ArfiuI
I"r2U&19

Actuel
FY

Mi&Year Budget /
Yerr-End Estimete

1019"10 nrt0r0-a1

EndBudgBt

rvrw7.0a

Rmr-nnmr
Gtunt Reveuues
Loan PqlloB

$

TrmqfeffiIll
Intoiost Earnin$ Lte€rwd Inter€st

Irrcndltrrw:
Lours Provided

$

;

Tftms&xOut
BadDoh Expsnse

AdminisffivoExpmoe

$
Excess (dcfteit) ofrevequos ovor qrpendit[rGs

Plogmm noom,/ Cah B.daoae:

tcan Reoaivablc Eitlanccl

s

1 10:0OO

110.000

I t0-000

110,000

Page 218

Item # 8.

Cityof GrrsVatloy

Flccal Y sr 2tll42 Flnrl Budget
CDBG llortu llrivc Fund Fund 2,!10)

Acfirl

rrt{[&19

AcErl

PT2orr-fl

MtGY:rB@rnl
Yerr-EdErffus
rYqn0-lr

rtldhd3ct
Fvm2t-tl

Rareuuc$

GrmtRmrauo

I$nFqpffi

i
3219

3,r19

3J19

3,219

300

300

300

300

3,519

3J19

3J19

3.519

Trapfcrr In

htarct Eunirgl / Aocrucd Inerpst
s

ErdlEtry
LmrEruvi&d
TmrftmOlil

3

Br.lffiEp@

3,J19

10,000

3519

10.000

Atlminimmirc Erpcoec
$

Escrs (d!ficit) of Fverrs w6 GflFcaditrEg

I

3.519

3.519

(6.{El)

Progrm hooo! / Cnsh Ba.latoo:

3

ac5s

6,974

{93

Iam Roocivrbh Balmcc:

!L

4oJl?

?719t

17298

4L7@

Page 219

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Ye*2021-22 Final Budget
Ilousing Rehab Fund (Fund 251)

Mid-Yerr Budgct /

Actuil

Acturl

FY 201&19

F"Y 2019-20

Ycrr-End Estimrte
Fv 202UZr

Find Budgct
FY 2021.,2

Rcvcnucr:
Grant Revenues
lnan Payofrs
Transfers In
Interest Eamings / Accrucd Interest

s

$

26,9t6

3,828

7,500

7,500

6,040

9,663

5,000

5,000

32,956

13,491

12,500

12,s00

Exoenditurer:
Ioans hovided

$

Transfcrs Out
Bad Debt Expense

32,956

20,000

Administative Expenses

$

32,956

500

500

500

20,500

Excess (dcficit) of revenucs over cxpenditures

$

13,491

r2.000

(t.000)

Program Income / Cash Balance:

$

9,991

16,991

3,99t

Loan Receivable Balance:

$

359,901

352,40t

344,901

364,436

Page 220

Item # 8.

City of Grass Valley
Fiscal Year 2021-22 Final Budget
CDBG Parks Grant Fund (Fund252)

Mid-Yerr Budgct/
Actuel

Actual

FY 20lt-19

FY 2019-20

Yeer-End Estimrte
t"Y 2020-21

Finel Budget
FV 2gZtan

Rcvenueg:
Grant Rcvenues
lnan Payoffs
Transfers In
Inter€st Eanings / Accrued Interest

$

3,s00,000

$

3,500,000

Erpenditurcs:
l,oans Provided
Transfers Out
Bad Debt Expense
Adminisbative Expcmes

$
3,500,000

$
Excess (deficit) ofrevcnucs over cxpenditures

$

Program Income / Cash Balancc:

$

loan Receivable Balance:

$

3"500.000

Page 221

Item # 9.

City of Grass Valley
City Council
Agenda Action Sheet

Council Meeting Date: June 8, 2021

Date Prepared: June 2, 2021

Prepared by: Bradford Kalstein, Information Technology Analyst
Title: Grass Valley Police Department’s operation of automated license plate recognition
(ALPR or LPR) systems and data sharing agreement through Vigilant/Motorola.
Recommended Motion: Informational
Agenda: Administrative
Background Information: Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) systems are
relatively ubiquitous across the state of California and serve a number of purposes. Over the past
many years, the Grass Valley Police Department (GVPD) has researched a number of different
ALPR platforms that can serve specific needs, particularity parking enforcement as well
as general crime detection and deterrence. GVPD has selected a primary ALPR system for those
uses, provided through Motorola Solutions Vigilant ALPR platform. Other systems exist and
may be incorporated over time. The Vigilant ALPR solution provides the police department
with a streamlined and efficient toolset that allows us to enforce parking limits, identify and
abate abandoned vehicles within geographical regions (i.e., neighborhoods), identify
stolen vehicles, and investigate crimes efficiently and effectively.
For everyday purposes, we are focusing resources on an electronic parking system utilizes GPS
coordinates combined with license plate recognition to create virtual “tire chalking” as the city
vehicle or handheld device passes parked vehicles. Images of the vehicles, and specific
characteristics, are used to determine if a vehicle has or has not moved in relevant periods of
time (i.e., hourly parking zones, use of street for storage, etc). The system can also produce
reports summarizing statistics related to a number of vehicles in violation of various
ordinances. No personal identifiable information (PII) is captured by the system. Ticketing or
enforcement action will require personnel resources.
As it relates to crime detection, ALPR has become a common law enforcement tool that has
repeatedly helped solve major crimes, including local homicides in which vehicles traveling
to/from Grass Valley have been detected on ALPR in other jurisdictions. Enhancing our
capability locally will assist in reducing crime and/or increasing solvability.
GVPD has implemented a policy in compliance with SB 34 and SB
54. The Department continually updates policy to ensure compliance with new laws or mandates
and conducts department-wide training on these new laws and/or policies. The ALPR policy
follows the requirements under Civil Code sections 1798.90.5 to 1798.90.55 by requiring the
following:

Page 222

Agenda Item # _______

Item # 9.

City of Grass Valley
City Council
Agenda Action Sheet
















Defines the authorized uses for the ALPR system. The Policy authorizes City
departments to use ALPR in support of parking operations and compliance activities.
The policy prohibits the Department from using ALPR data for monitoring individuals
and prohibits the use of ALPR cameras in areas where there is a reasonable expectation
of privacy.
Specifies which City employees and contractors are authorized to access the ALPR
system. Access to ALPR systems is limited to Police Department employees.
Outlines training requirements for City staff authorized to access the ALPR system.
The policy requires all authorized users of ALPR systems to receive training prior to
being granted system access.
Describes how ALPR systems will be monitored to ensure the security of information
and compliance with applicable privacy laws. The policy requires ALPR systems to store
information about all logins and data queries. These data points will be monitored and
periodically audited by the department’s designated administrator to ensure access to the
data is made by authorized persons for authorized uses only.
Defines the purposes of, processes for, and restrictions on the sale, sharing, or transfer of
ALPR information to other persons or agencies. The policy prohibits the sale,
publication, exchange, or disclosure of ALPR data for commercial purposes, the
unauthorized disclosure or publication of ALPR data, and the dissemination of ALPR
information to unauthorized persons. The City will provide ALPR data to Federal, State,
or local law enforcement agencies only if a warrant or subpoena is issued or if a MOU for
data sharing via the Motorola Vigilant system is executed, and in compliance with
existing laws.
Defines the title of the official custodian, or owner, of the ALPR system responsible for
implementing Civil Code requirements for ALPR systems. The policy designates
the administrator in the Police Department as the official custodian of that department’s
ALPR system and assigns responsibility for implementing Civil Code requirements to
that individual.
Describes the reasonable measures used to ensure the accuracy of ALPR information and
correct data errors. The program administrator or their designee will review ALPR data
for accuracy and correct license plate translation errors when identified. Authorized staff
will confirm the computer translation of license plate characters prior to taking any
action, such as applying fees or penalties, or taking investigative action, based on ALPR
results.
Describes the length of time ALPR information will be retained, and the process the
ALPR operator will utilize to determine if and when to destroy retained ALPR
information. The policy requires the City or their vendors to purge ALPR data after 365

Page 223

Agenda Item # _______

Item # 9.

City of Grass Valley
City Council
Agenda Action Sheet

days, unless otherwise required to be maintained longer by law or when specifically
preserved as may be required by law.
As a leader in innovation and the use of technology to keep our community safe,
the police department is consistently evaluating critical infrastructure protection and public
safety technologies. Proven tools like ALPR systems can be responsibly operated and
intelligently implemented to balance individual privacy with efficient and effective public safety
strategies that keep our community safe. ALPR systems, whether mounted to fixed locations or
on patrol cars or in combination, offer continued opportunities to leverage technology for good.
Public Notice:
Public notification was achieved by posting the agenda, with the agenda items being listed, at
least 72 hours prior to the meeting and opportunity public comment will be authorized and
considered pursuant to Civil Code 1798.90.55.
Council Goals/Objectives:
High Performance Government & Quality Service and Public Safety
Fiscal Impact:
Abandoned vehicle abatement (AVA) funds will fund the initial program. Ongoing costs will be
budgeted for in the Police Department’s budget.
Funds Available: Yes
Reviewed by:
____ City Manager

Page 224

Agenda Item # _______

Item # 10.

City of Grass Valley
City Council
Agenda Action Sheet
Council Meeting Date: June 8, 2021

Date Prepared: June 4, 2021

Prepared by: Timothy M. Kiser, City Manager
Title: Water Conservation
Recommended Motion: That Council review and provide any comments on the draft
resolution implementing Water Conservation Requirements.
Agenda: Administrative
Background Information: On May 10, 2021, Governor Newsom modified a State of
Emergency Proclamation a State of Emergency to exist in California due to severe drought
conditions to included 41 counties, including Nevada County. The Proclamation directed
state agencies to partner with local water suppliers to promote conservation through
the Save Our Water campaign, a critical resources for Californians during the 2012-2016
drought. Some municipalities have already adopted mandatory local water-saving
requirements, and many more have called for voluntary water use reductions.
Staff is proposing a Resolution to implement some water use reductions. A draft version
of this resolution is attached for Council consideration with this item returning to Council
on June 22, 2021 for final approval.
Council Goals/Objectives: This resolution executes portions of work tasks towards
achieving/maintaining Strategic Plan – Water and Wastewater Systems and Underground
Infrastructure. The City of Grass Valley is devoted to providing a safe Place to Live,
Work and Play.
Fiscal Impact: The Fiscal Impact is anticipated to be minimal at this time, but if the
drought worsens the actual fiscal impact may change.
Funds Available: N/A

Account#: N/A

Reviewed by: ____ City Manager

Agenda Item # ________

Page 225

RESOLUTION No. 2021-xx

Item # 10.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRASS VALLEY
APPROVING WATER CONSERVATION
WHEREAS, much of the West is experiencing severe to exceptional drought and California is in
a second consecutive year of dry conditions, resulting in drought or near-drought throughout many
portions of the State; and
WHEREAS, these drought conditions can result in degraded water quality, setbacks to vulnerable
and rural communities through job losses and longer-lasting recoveries, significant impacts to
fisheries, constraints on access to traditional lifeways, loss of aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity,
and ecosystem impacts; and
WHEREAS, experience in the last drought has demonstrated the value of preparing earlier for
potential sustained dry conditions; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Water Code Section 350, the City as the governing body of public
water supply may declare a water shortage emergency condition to prevail within the area served;
and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grass Valley as
follows:
1.
2.

3.

4.

That the foregoing statements are true and correct.
That to promote water conservation, each of the following actions is prohibited, except
where necessary to address an immediate health and safety need or to comply with a term
or condition in a permit issued by a state or federal agency:
(a) The application of potable water to outdoor landscapes in a manner that
causes runoff such that water flows onto adjacent property, non-irrigated
areas, private and public walkways, roadways, parking lots, or structures;
(b) The use of a hose that dispenses potable water to wash a motor vehicle, except
where the hose is fitted with a shut-off nozzle or device attached to it that
causes it to cease dispensing water immediately when not in use;
(c) The application of potable water to driveways and sidewalks; and
(d) The use of potable water in a fountain or other decorative water feature,
except where the water is part of a recirculating system.
That to encourage water conservation, each of the following actions are recommended,
except where necessary to address an immediate health and safety need or to comply with
a term or condition in a permit issued by a state or federal agency:
(a) Repair of City’s Water System leaks shall be a high priority.
(b) Restaurant owners are requested not to serve water unless requested by the
customer.
(c) Residential, garden, and landscape irrigation shall be prohibited during the
hottest portion of the day (10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.).
(d) Encourage that all treated water metered school grounds, and all other public
grounds reduce their water usage by 15 percent.
That taking of any action prohibited in this section, in addition to any other applicable civil
or criminal penalties, is an infraction, punishable by a fine of up to five hundred dollars
($500) for each day in which the violation occurs.
Page 226

Page 1 of 2

Item # 10.

5.
6.

The Public Works Director/City Engineer or their appointed designee is hereby authorized
and empowered to enforce the provisions of this Resolution in addition to other applicable
sections of the City’s Municipal Code to promote water conservation.
That this Resolution shall remain in effect through December 31, 2021.

ADOPTED as a Resolution by the City Council of the City of Grass Valley at a regular meeting
thereof held on the 22nd day of June 2021, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINS:
ABSENT:
By: ______________________________

Ben Aguilar, Mayor

Attest
By: ______________________________

Taylor Day, Deputy City Clerk

Approved as to Form
By: ______________________________
Michael G. Colantuono, City Attorney

Page 2 of 2
C:\windows\TEMP\tmpA858.tmp

Page 227